Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Learning and Exploration in Quality Management and Continuous Improvement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quality in the 21st Century

Abstract

The long-term health of any organization depends on its commitment to continuous improvement, which is one aspect of quality management. While we do not yet fully understand the link between quality management and organizational performance, previous research suggests that this relationship is often moderated or mediated by other factors. This chapter specifically considers the role that learning and exploration play in continuous improvement efforts within organizations. The aim of this discussion is to extend previous considerations regarding the juxtaposition of stability and reliability (control) versus exploration and innovation (learning) in quality/continuous improvement; hence, this work first explores learning in terms of a process that generates knowledge that organizations use to build competitive advantage. This chapter also examines the need to balance between the exploitation of existing knowledge and the exploration of new alternatives. This discussion suggests that learning and exploration are mutually beneficial when considered within the context of continuous improvement. In addition, these concepts compliment traditional notions of quality management/improvement and, therefore, expand our thinking about these topics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M (1996) Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal 39 (5):1154–1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand G, Ward PT, Tatikonda MV (2010) Role of explicit and tacit knowledge in Six Sigma projects: An empirical examination of differential project success. Journal of Operations Management 28 (4):303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C (1976) Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (3):363–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C (1982) Reasoning, Learning, and Action: Individual and Organizational. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C, Schon D (1978) Organizational Learning: A theory of action perspective. Addision-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1):99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessant J, Caffyn S, Gallagher M (2001) An evolutionary model of continuous improvement behaviour. Technovation 21 (2):67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn R, Lapre MA (2011) Accelerated learning by experimentation. In: Jaber MY (ed) Learning curves: Theory, models, and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 191–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud DJ, Keogh R, Walker D (1985) Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brassard M, Ritter D (2010) The memory jogger II: A pocket guide of tools for continuous improvement and effective planning. Goal/QPC, Salem, NH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breyfogle F (1999) Implementing Six Sigma: Smarter Solution Using Statistical Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choo AS, Linderman K, Schroeder RG (2007a) Method and context perspectives on learning and knowledge creation in quality management. Journal of Operations Management 25 (4):918–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choo AS, Linderman KW, Schroeder RG (2007b) Method and psychological effects on learning behaviors and knowledge creation in quality improvement projects. Management Science 53 (3):437–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH, Prusak L (1998) Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bono E (1993) Serious creativity: Using the power of lateral thinking to create new ideas. HarperCollins, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean JW, Bowen DE (1994) Management theory and total quality: improving research and practice through theory development. Academy of Management Review 19 (3):392–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming WE (1986) Out of the Crisis. 1st edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1922) Human Nature and Conduct. Holt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley K (2000) The paradigms of quality: evolution and revolution in the history of the discipline. Advances in the Management of Organizational Quality 5:1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas TJ, Judge WQ (2001) Total Quality Management Implementation and Competitive Advantage: The Role of Structural Control and Exploration. The Academy of Management Journal 44 (1):158–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (2):350–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiol CM, Lyles MA (1985) Organizational learning. The Academy of Management Review 10 (4):803–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn BB, Schroeder RG, Sakakibara S (1995) The Impact of Quality Management Practices on Performance and Competitive Advantage. Decision Sciences 26 (5):659–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitlow H, Oppenheim A, Oppenheim R (1995) Quality Management: Tools and Methods for Improvement. 2nd edn. Irwin, Burr Ridge, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R (1996a) Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science 7 (4):375–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1996b) Toward a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (10):109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman JR, Wageman R (1995) Total Quality Management: Empirical, Conceptual, and Practical Issues. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (2):309–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyrup S (2004) Reflection as a core process in organisational learning. Journal of Workplace Learning 16 (7/8):442–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa K (1985) What is Total Quality Control? The Japanese Way. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran JM (1969) Managerial Breakthrough: A New Concept of the Managers Job. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran JM (1974) Quality Control Handbook. 3 edn. McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal 45 (6):1183–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaynak H (2003) The Relationship between Total Quality Management Practices and their Effects on Firm Performance. Journal of Operations Management 21 (4):405–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology. Organization Science 3 (3):383–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolesar PJ (1994) What Deming told the Japanese in 1950. Quality Management Journal 2 (1):9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovach JV, Fredendall LD (2013) The influence of continuous improvement practices on learning: An empirical study. Quality Management Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapré MA, Van Wassenhove LN (2001) Creating and transferring knowledge for productivity improvement in factories. Management Science 47 (10):1311–1325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton D (1995) Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linderman K, Schroeder RG, Zaheer S, Liedtke C, Choo AS (2004) Integrating quality management practices with knowledge creation processes. Journal of Operations Management 22 (6):589–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDuffie JP (1997) The Road to “root cause”: Shop-floor problem-solving at three auto assembly plants. Management Science 43 (4):479–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2 (1):71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath RG (2001) Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management journal 44 (1):118–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow J (1990) How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. In: Mezirow J (ed) Fostering critical reflection in adulthood. A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. Jossey-Bass San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, pp 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee AS, Lapre MA, van Wassenhove LN (1998) Knowledge driven quality improvement. Management Science 44 (11):35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair A (2006) Meta-analysis of the relationship between quality management practices and firm performance—Implications for quality management theory development. Journal of Operations Management 24 (6):948–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIST (2009) Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award: 2009–10 Criteria for Performance Excellence. National Institute of Standards and Technology of the United States Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1991) The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review 69 (6):96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5 (1):14–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh M, Frey BS (2000) Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization Science 11 (5):538–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin SB, Sutcliffe KM, Schroeder RG (1994) Distinguishing control from learning in Total Quality Management: A contingency perspective. The Academy of Management Review 19 (3):537–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tague NR (2005) The quality toolbox. 2nd edn. ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomke SH (1998) Managing experimentation in the design of new products. Management Science 44 (6):743–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman ML, O’Reilly III CA (1996) Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review 38 (4):8–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vera D, Crossan M (2003) Organizational learning and knowledge management: Toward an integrative framework. In: Easterby-Smith M, Lyles A (eds) Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp 122–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor B, Boynton A, Stephens-Jahng T (2000) The effective design of work under total quality management. Organization Science 11 (1):102–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter SG (1994) Organizing for continuous improvement: Evolutionary theory meets the quality revolution. In: Baum JAC, Singh JV (eds) Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 90–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woerkom M (2003) Critical reflection at work. Bridging individual and organizational learning. University of Twente, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information and Logistics Technology, University of Houston, 4730 Calhoun Rd, Houston, TX, 77204, USA

    Jamison V Kovach

Authors
  1. Jamison V Kovach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamison V Kovach .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal

    Paulo Sampaio

  2. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

    Pedro Saraiva

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kovach, J.V. (2016). The Role of Learning and Exploration in Quality Management and Continuous Improvement. In: Sampaio, P., Saraiva, P. (eds) Quality in the 21st Century. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21332-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21332-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21331-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21332-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation