Advertisement

Dynamic Task Planning of Aerial Robotic Platforms for Ground Sensor Data Collection and Processing

  • Grigore Stamatescu
  • Dan Popescu
  • Cristian Mateescu
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 371)

Abstract

The adoption of wireless sensor network systems is becoming wide-spread in critical large-scale monitoring applications. These include but are not limited to pipeline infrastructures for oil and water, border areas, roads and railway systems. In such scenarios, airborne robotic platforms like unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can provide valuable services for data collection, communication relaying and higher level supervision. This is the case for both single UAV deployment as well as for swarms of UAVs collaboratively integrated into monitoring systems. The paper discusses the opportunity for in-network pre-processing of sensor data for local UAV task planning in order to increase the efficiency of data collection processes. A gradient scheme is introduced for decision support of the UAV task planning. Results are validated by simulation.

Keywords

Wireless sensor networks (WSN) Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) Information processing Data collection Large scale monitoring 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work of Grigore Stamatescu has been funded by the Sectoral Operational Programme Human Resources Development 2007–2013 of the Ministry of European Funds through the Financial Agreement POSDRU/159/1.5/S/134398. The work of Dan Popescu and Cristian Mateescu was supported by a grant of the Romanian Space Agency, “Multisensory Robotic System for Aerial Monitoring of Critical Infrastructure Systems” (MUROS), project number 71/2013.

References

  1. 1.
    Athreya, A.P., Tague, P.: Network self-organization in the internet of things. In: Sensor, Mesh and Ad hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), 10th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference, vol. 25, no. 33, pp. 24–27 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stamatescu, G., Sgârciu, V.: Evaluation of wireless sensor network monitoring for indoor spaces. In: International Symposium on Instrumentation & Measurement, Sensor Network and Automation (IMSNA), 2012, vol. 1, pp. 107–111 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jawhar, I., Mohamed, N., Al-Jaroodi, J., Zhang, S.: A framework for using unmanned aerial vehicles for data collection in linear wireless sensor networks. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 74(1), 437–453 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zimmerling, M. Dargie, W., Reason, J.M.: Localized power-aware routing in linear wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Context-Awareness for Self-managing Systems (CASEMANS ’08). ACM, New York, pp. 24–33 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Owojaiye, G., Sun, Y.: Focal design issues affecting the deployment of wireless sensor networks for pipeline monitoring. Ad Hoc Netw. 11(3), 1237–1253 (2013). ISSN 1570-8705, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.09.006
  6. 6.
    Antonio, P., Grimaccia, F., Mussetta, M.: Architecture and methods for innovative heterogeneous wireless sensor network applications. Remote Sens. 4, 1146–1161 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Orfanus, D., Eliassen, F., de Freitas, E.P.: Self-organizing relay network supporting remotely deployed sensor nodes in military operations, ICUMT, pp. 326–333 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, H., Chang, K.C., Agate, C.S.: A dynamic path planning algorithm for UAV tracking. In: Proceedings of SPIE 7336, Signal Processing, Sensor Fusion, and Target Recognition XVIII, p. 73360B (2009). doi: 10.1117/12.819836
  9. 9.
    Lanillos, P., Gan, S.K., Besada-Portas, E., Pajares, G., Sukkarieh, S.: Multi-UAV target search using decentralized gradient-based negotiation with expected observation. Inf. Sci. 282, 92–110 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.05.054, ISSN 0020-0255
  10. 10.
    Stamatescu G., Popescu D., Dobrescu, R.: Cognitive radio as solution for ground-aerial surveillance through WSN and UAV infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the 6th Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence Conference, IWSSS Workshop, Bucharest, 23–25 Oct 2014Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stamatescu, G., Chitu, C,; Vasile, C., Stamatescu, I., Popescu, D., Sgârciu, V.: Analytical and experimental sensor node energy modeling in ambient monitoring. In: Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), IEEE 9th Conference, pp. 1615–1620 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Intel Lab Data. Available on-line: http://db.csail.mit.edu/labdata/labdata.html
  13. 13.
    Bristeau, P.-J., Callou, F., Vissière, D., Petit, N.: The navigation and control technology inside the AR. Drone micro UAV. In: 18th IFAC World Congress, pp. 1477–1484. Milano (2011). doi: 10.3182/20110828-6-IT-1002.02327

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grigore Stamatescu
    • 1
  • Dan Popescu
    • 1
  • Cristian Mateescu
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Automation and Industrial InformaticsUniversity Politehnica of BucharestBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Teamnet InternationalBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations