Abstract
Urban governance in cities is shaped by, and shapes, global discourses. These discourses shape the discussion of how governance should be organized, what forms it takes, what kinds of governance instruments, methods and data are used and what urban governance practices may look like. Much of this is presented in gender- and place/space-neutral, objective language and complex scientific jargon, which obfuscates the highly political nature of the shifts in governance and associated governance theories, instruments, methods and practices. It is assumed that these dimensions can be scaled up and down and transferred to different contexts. Close examination reveals, however, that many of these are being used in the service of the most powerful, while the shift from government to (network) governance creates the illusion of empowering all. In practice, accountability, legitimacy, legality and equity are compromised as the most powerful actors influence the governance process. In the process, public goods and services are being privatized; infrastructure developments relocate the poor and serve the rich; market/economic instruments are replacing regulatory ones; big data and maps can be used manipulatively; and network governance and participatory processes may be more disempowering than empowering. This chapter argues for a deconstruction of discourses, theories, instruments, methods, technologies, practices and outcomes to ensure that these are used in the service of human well being and their ecosystems. This deconstruction should build on an understanding that place specificities are highly relevant and that urban governance is situated in a produced space. Moreover, cities and urban governance do not operate in a vacuum but are related to and intertwined with processes at other scalar levels.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armitage D, Marschke M, Plummer R (2008) Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Glob Environ Change 18:86–98
Baud I, Pfeffer K, Scott D, Denis E, Sydenstricker-Neto J (2014) Participatory ‘spatial’ knowledge management configurations in metropolitan governance networks for SD. Thematic report, WP5.Chance2Sustain EADI, Bonn. Available via http://www.chance2sustain.eu/82.0.html. Accessed 14 Mar 2015
Borgman C (2014) Big data, little data and beyond. MIT Press, Cambridge
Bulkeley H, Betsill MM (2005) Rethinking sustainable cities: multilevel governance and the ‘urban’ politics of climate change. Environ Pollut 1:42–63
Chhotray V, Stoker G (2009) Governance theory and practice. A cross-disciplinary approach. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndsmills
Davies JS (2012) Network governance theory: a Gramscian critique. Environ Plan A 44(11):2687–2704
Elwood S, Leszczynski A (2011) Privacy, reconsidered: new representations, data practices, and the geoweb. Geoforum 42(1):6–15
Fisher E (2010) Media and new capitalism in the digital age: the spirit of networks. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Fuchs C (2009) Internet and society: social theory and the information age. Routledge, Abingdon/New York
Gupta J, Pouw NRM, Ros-Tonen MAF (2015) Towards an elaborated theory of inclusive development. Eur J Dev Res (in press)
Harley JB (1989) Deconstructing the map. Cartographica 26(2):1–20
Hurlbert M, Gupta J (2015) The split ladder of participation: a diagnostic and evaluation tool. Environ Sci Policy 50:100–113
Laney D (2001) 3D data management: controlling data volume, variety and velocity, META Group File 949. Available via http://blogs.gartner.com/doug-laney/files/2012/01/ad949-3D-Data-Management-Controlling-Data-Volume-Velocity-and-Variety.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2015
Miranda Sara L, Baud I (2014) Knowledge building in adaptation management: concertacion processes in transforming lima water and climate change governance. Environ Urban 26(2):505–524
Oxfam (2014) Even it up: time to end extreme inequality. Oxfam, Oxford
Pahl-Wostl C, Hare M (2004) Processes of social learning in integrated resources management. J Community Appl Soc 14:193–206
Parikh JK (1992) IPCC strategies unfair to the South. Nature 360:507–508
Pentland A (2011) Society’s nervous system: building effective government, energy, and public health systems. Pervasive Mob Comput 7(6):643–659
Pfeffer K, Martinez J, Baud I, Sridharan N (2011) Knowledge production in urban governance systems through qualitative geographical information systems (GIS). Environ Urban Asia 2(2):235–250
Pickles J (1995) Toward an economy of electronic representation and the virtual sign. In: Pickles J (ed) Ground truth: the social implications of geographic information systems. Guildford Press, London
Piketty T (2014) Capital in the 21st century. Harvard University, Cambridge
Robinson J (2006) Ordinary cities: between modernity and development. Routledge, London
Roche S (2014) Geographic information science I: why does a smart city need to be spatially enabled? Prog Hum Geogr 38(5):703–711
Sayer J, Sunderland T, Ghazoul J, Pfund JL, Sheil D, Meijaard E, Venter M et al (2013) Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 21:8349–8356
Seto KC, Sánchez-RodrÃguez R, Fragkias M (2010) The new geography of contemporary urbanization and the environment. Annu Rev Environ Resour 35:167–194
Taylor L, Schroeder R (2014) Is bigger better? The emergence of big data as a tool for international development policy. Geojournal. doi:10.1007/s10708-014-9603-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gupta, J., Pfeffer, K., Ros-Tonen, M., Verrest, H. (2015). An Inclusive Development Perspective on the Geographies of Urban Governance. In: Gupta, J., Pfeffer, K., Verrest, H., Ros-Tonen, M. (eds) Geographies of Urban Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21272-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21272-2_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21271-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21272-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)