Advertisement

Is “Spirituality” Nothing but “Religion”? An Indirect Measurement Approach

  • Constantin KleinEmail author
  • Ralph W. Hood
  • Christopher F. Silver
  • Barbara Keller
  • Heinz Streib
Chapter

Abstract

While people might distinguish strictly between “spirituality” and “religion” on the explicit level of cognition, it is possible that such differences disappear on the implicit level. Implicit Association Tests (IAT s) provide a reliable and valid indirect procedure to measure implicit cognition. However, IAT s comparing “spirituality” and “religion” have not been used often in research yet. Earlier studies have tried to contrast both concepts either directly in one IAT or have used both concepts as a single category. Thus, in their operationalization they did not take the broadness, vagueness, and partial overlap of both terms into account satisfyingly. For a more valid comparison, in the Bielefeld-based Cross-cultural Study on “Spirituality,” both “spirituality” and “religion” have been assessed by using the same stimuli and have been contrasted with “atheism ” as a third concept. The results based on a subsample of 104 participants (USA: n = 67, Germany: n = 37) show that the task difficulties were reasonable and that both IAT s proved to be reliable. The general IAT effect s were .33 (USA) and .36 (Germany) for “spirituality” and .26 (USA) and .22 (Germany) for “religion,” indicating a preference for both “spirituality” and “religion” when contrasted with “atheism .” The effect sizes differ in parts significantly between four groups of explicit “spiritual/religious” self-identification in both countries. Explicit “spiritual”/“religious” self-ratings correlate highly significant with the IAT effect s for “spirituality” and “religion.” Although, in general, the IAT scores are also very highly correlated, comparison between the four subgroups revealed that explicit self-rating and implicit attitude towards “spirituality” differ significantly among those who distinguish between their “spirituality” and “religion” on the explicit level.

Keywords

Spirituality Religion Atheism Implicit cognition IAT 

References

  1. Ammerman, N. T. (2013). Spiritual but not religious? Beyond binary choices in the study of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52, 258–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bassett, R. L., Thrower, J., Barclay, J., Powers, C., Smith, A., Tindall, M., … Monroe, J. (2005). One effort to measure implicit attitudes toward spirituality and religion. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 24, 210–218.Google Scholar
  3. Berghuijs, J., Pieper, J., & Bakker, C. (2013). Conceptions of spirituality among the Dutch population. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 35, 369–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarke, J. (2009). A critical view of how nursing has defined spirituality. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 1666–1673.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Daaleman, T. P., & Frey, B. B. (2004). The Spirituality Index of Well-Being: A new instrument for health-related quality of life research. Annals of Family Medicine, 2, 499–503.Google Scholar
  7. Doyle, D. (1992). Have we looked beyond the physical and psychosocial? Journal of Pain Symptom Management, 7, 302–311.Google Scholar
  8. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and uses. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fuller, R. C. (2001). Spiritual, but not religious: Understanding unchurched America. Oxford: Oxford UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. GESIS—Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (Ed.) (2014). ALLBUS 2012 (Full Version). Mannheim: GESIS—Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. Online available at: www.gesis.org/dienstleistungen/daten/umfragedaten/allbus/. 3 January 2014.
  11. Gomez, R., & Fisher, J. W. (2003). Domains of spiritual well-being and development and validation of the Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1975–1991.Google Scholar
  12. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenwald, A. G., Poehlmann, A. T., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Greenwald, D. F., & Harder, D. W. (2003). The dimensions of spirituality. Psychological Reports, 92, 975–980.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gschwendner, T., Hofmann, W., & Schmitt, M. (2006). Ein Modell des Zusammenhangs impliziter Reaktionszeitverfahren mit Fragebogenmaßen [A model of the relation of implicit reaction time measures and questionnaires]. In R. T. Proyer, T. M. Ortner, & K. D. Kubinger (Eds.), Theorie und Praxis Objektiver Persönlichkeitstests (pp. 69–86). Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  17. Heelas, P., Woodhead, L., Seel, B., Szerszynski, B., & Tusting, K. (2005). The spiritual revolution: Why religion is giving way to spirituality. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Hill, P. C., & Pargament, K. I. (2003). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: Implications for physical and mental health research. American Psychologist, 58, 64–74.Google Scholar
  19. Hill, P. C., Pargament, K. I., Hood, R. W., McCullough, M. E., Swyers, J. P., Larson, D. B., & Zinnbauer, B. J. (2000). Conceptualizing religion and spirituality: Points of commonality, points of departure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 30, 51–77.Google Scholar
  20. Houtman, D., & Aupers, S. (2007). The spiritual turn and the decline of tradition: The spread of post-Christian spirituality in 14 Western countries, 1981–2000. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46, 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huber, S., & Klein, C. (2011). Spirituelle und religiöse Konstrukträume. Plurale Konstruktionsweisen religiöser und spiritueller Identitäten im Spiegel der deutschen Daten des Religionsmonitors 2008 [Spiritual and religious construct spaces. Plural modes of constructing religious and spiritual identities as reflected in the data of the Religion Monitor 2008]. In A. Büssing & N. B. Kohls (Eds.), Spiritualität transdisziplinär. Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen im Zusammenhang mit Gesundheit und Krankheit (pp. 53–66). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience. New York: Collier (1961).Google Scholar
  23. Koenig, H. G. (2008). Concerns about measuring “spirituality” in research. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 196, 349–355.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. LaBouff, J. P., Rowatt, W. C., Johnson, M. K., Thedford, M., & Tsang, J. A. (2010). Development and initial validation of an implicit measure of religiousness-spirituality. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49, 439–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. La Cour, P., Ausker, N. H., & Hvidt, N. C. (2012). Six understandings of the word spirituality in a secular country. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 34, 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luckmann, T. (1967). The invisible religion: The problem of religion in modern society. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  27. Marler, P. L., & Hadaway, C. K. (2002). “Being religious” or “being spiritual” in America: A zero-sum proposition? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 289–300.Google Scholar
  28. Meier, B. P., Hauser, D. J., Robinson, M. D., Friesen, C. K., & Schjeldahl, K. (2007). What’s “up” with God? Vertical space as a representation of the divine. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 699–710.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. National Opinion Research Center (Ed.) (2013). General Social Survey 1972–2012 Data File. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center. Online available at: www3.norc.org/GSS+Website/. 3 April 2014.
  30. Oman, D. (2013). Defining religion and spirituality. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed., pp. 23–47). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  31. Peteet, J. R. (1994). Approaching spiritual problems in psychotherapy: A conceptual framework. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 3, 237–245.Google Scholar
  32. Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., Brady, M. J., Hernandez, L., & Cella, D. (2002). Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy—Spiritual Well-Being scale (FACIT-Sp). Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 49–58.Google Scholar
  33. Pickel, G. (2013). Religionsmonitor – verstehen, was verbindet. Religiosität im internationalen Vergleich.[Religion Monitor—understanding what connects. Religiousness in international comparison]. Bertelsmann Stiftung: Gütersloh.Google Scholar
  34. Reinert, K. G., & Koenig, H. G. (2013). Re-examining definitions of spirituality in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69, 2622–2634.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Saucier, G., & Skrzypinska, K. (2006). Spiritual but not religious? Evidence for two independent dispositions. Journal of Personality, 74, 1257–1292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Schlehofer, M. M., Omoto, A. M., & Adelman, J. R. (2008). How do “religion” and “spirituality” differ? Lay definitions among older adults. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47, 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schleiermacher, F. D. E. (1799). In R. Crouter (Ed.), On religion. Speeches to its cultural despisers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2006).Google Scholar
  38. Schmukle S. C., & Egloff, B. (2011). Indirekte Verfahren zur Erfassung von Persönlichkeit („Objektive Persönlichkeitstests“) [Indirect measures for the assessment of personality (“Objective personality tests”)]. In M. Amelang, L. F. Hornke, & M. Kersting (Eds.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Psychologische Diagnostik: Band 4. Persönlichkeitsdiagnostik (pp. 73–120). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  39. Shariff, A. F., Cohen, A. B., & Norenzayan, A. (2008). The devil’s advocate: Secular arguments diminish both implicit and explicit religious belief. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8, 417–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Streib, H. (2008). More spiritual than religious: Changes in the religious field require new approaches. In H. Streib, A. Dinter, & K. Söderblom (Eds.), Lived religion—conceptual, empirical and practical-theological approaches (pp. 53–67). Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tanyi, R. (2002). Towards a clarification of the meaning of spirituality. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 39, 500–509.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. The WHOQOL-SRPB Group. (2002). WHOQOL Spirituality, Religiousness, and Personal Beliefs (SRPB) Field-Test Instrument. The WHOQOL-100 questions plus 32 SRPB questions. Geneva: WHO. Online available at: www.who.int/mental_health/media/en/622.pdf
  45. Utsch, M., & Klein, C. (2011). Religion, Religiosität, Spiritualität: Bestimmungsversuche für komplexe Begriffe [Religion, religiousness, spirituality: Attempts for the conceptualization of complex terms]. In C. Klein, H. Berth, & F. Balck (Eds.), Gesundheit - Religion - Spiritualität. Konzepte, Befunde und Erklärungsansätze (pp. 25–45). Weinheim: Juventa.Google Scholar
  46. Ventis, W. L., Ball, C. T., & Viggiano, C. (2010). A Christian Humanist implicit association test: Validity and test-retest reliability. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2, 181–189.Google Scholar
  47. Walker, L. J., & Pitts, R. C. (1998). Naturalistic conceptions of moral maturity. Developmental Psychology, 34, 403–419.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wenger, J. L., & Yarbrough, T. D. (2005). Religious individuals: Evaluating their intrinsic and extrinsic motivations at the implicit level of awareness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 5–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Westerink, H. (2012). Spirituality in psychology of religion: A concept in search of its meaning. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 34, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wuthnow, R. (1998). After heaven. Spirituality in America since the 1950s. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  51. Zinnbauer, B. J., & Pargament, K. I. (2005). Religiousness and spirituality. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 21–42). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  52. Zinnbauer, B. J., Pargament, K. I., Cole, B., Rye, M. S., Butter, E. M., Belavich, … Kadar, J. L. (1997). Religion and spirituality: Unfuzzying the fuzzy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36, 549–564.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Constantin Klein
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ralph W. Hood
    • 2
  • Christopher F. Silver
    • 2
  • Barbara Keller
    • 1
  • Heinz Streib
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BielefeldBielefeldGermany
  2. 2.University of TennesseChattanoogaUSA

Personalised recommendations