Advertisement

“Experimenting with Ideologies…”—A “More Spiritual Than Religious” Zen Buddhist

  • Thomas J. ColemanIIIEmail author
  • Anne Swhajor-Biesemann
  • Derek Giamundo
  • Christopher Vance
  • Ralph W. HoodJr.
  • Christopher F. Silver
Chapter

Abstract

Identity is complex; the cultural milieu of possible worldviews, and accompanying identifying terminology said to represent such a worldview, even more so. Just as this book demonstrates, a simple term such as “spirituality” can refer to a multiplicity of understandings, which may even wholly contradict one another. In our present study, Brian C. has found comfort “experimenting with ideologies,” and identity tinkering over the course of his life. As his case will demonstrate, the process of identity formation is exemplified by its disunity. To this point, Brian identifies as an atheist Zen Buddhist , who is not only “spiritual,” but also “religious.” Raised in a religion (Christianity) he identified with until adolescence, Brian had been a practicing Buddhist for several years at the time of the interview.

Keywords

Zen buddhism Atheism Spirituality Horizontal transcendence Identity 

References

  1. Bayart, J. (2005). The illusion of cultural identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beit-Hallahmi, B. (2015). Psychological perspectives on religion and religiosity. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Belzen, J. (2010). Towards cultural psychology of religion. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  5. Bluck, S., & Habermas, T. (2002). The life story schema. Motivation and Emotion, 24(2), 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chalmers, D. (1997). The conscious mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, Z., Zhang, Y., Qi, W., & Hood, R. W, Jr. (2011). Mystical experience in Pure Land and Ch’an Buddhist monks: A phenomenological and quantitative study of minimally interpreted experience. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50, 654–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Churchland, P., & Churchland, P. (1998). On the contrary. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Coleman III, T. J., & Hood, R. W., Jr. (2015). Reconsidering everything: from folk categories to existential theory of mind. [Peer commentary on the paper “From weird experiences to revelatory events” by A. Taves]. Religion and Society: Advances in Research, 6(1), 18–22.Google Scholar
  10. Coleman III, T. J., Hood, R. W., Jr., & Shook, J. R. (2015). An introduction to atheism, secularity, and science. [Special issue]. Science, Religion & Culture, 2(3), 1–12.Google Scholar
  11. Coleman III, T. J., & Arrowood, R. B. (2015). Only we can save ourselves: An atheists ‘salvation’. In H. Bacon, W. Dossett, & S. Knowles (Eds.), Alternative salvations: Engaging the sacred and the secular. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  12. Coleman III, T. J., (2013). The secular reality: A response to Pratt’s “Durkheim-ian Dread.” The Religious Studies Project Podcast Series. Online at: http://www.religiousstudiesproject.com/2013/02/06/the-secular-reality-by-thomas-j-coleman-iii/
  13. Coleman III, T. J., Silver, C. F., & Holcombe, J. (2013). Focusing on horizontal transcendence: Much more than a “non-belief”. Essays in The philosophy of Humanism, 21(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
  14. Cotter, C. (2011). Consciousness raising: The critique, agenda, and inherent precariousness of contemporary anglophone atheism. International Journal for the Study of New Religions, 2(1), 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deacon, T. (2012). Incomplete nature. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  16. Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
  17. Durkheim, E. ([1915]1965). The elementary forms of the religious life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Exline, J. J. (2013). Religious and spiritual struggles. In K. I. Pargament, J. J. Exline, & J. W. Jones (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology of religion, and spirituality (Vol. 1: Context, theory, and research) (pp. 459–475). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  19. Exline, J. J., & Rose, E. D. (2013). Religious and spiritual struggles. In R. Paloutzian & C. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed., pp. 380–398). New York and London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fowler, J., Streib, H., & Keller, B. (2004). Manual for faith development research. Bielefeld: Research Center for Biographical Studies in Contemporary Religion.Google Scholar
  21. Frankl, V. (1988). The will to meaning. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  22. Gervais, W., Willard, A., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2011). The cultural transmission of faith. Why innate intuitions are necessary, but insufficient, to explain religious belief. Religion, 41(3), 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. (2008). Five misunderstandings about cultural evolution. Human Nature, 19(2), 119–137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hood, R. W. (1975). The construction and preliminary validation of a measure of reported mystical experience. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 14, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hood, R. W. (2014). Chemically assisted mysticism and the question of Veridicality. In J. Harold Ellens (Ed.), Seeking the sacred with psychoactive substances: Chemical paths to spirituality and God. Volume I: History and practices (pp. 395–410). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
  26. Hood, R. W., Hill, P., & Spilka, B. (2009). The psychology of religion (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Keller, B., & Streib, H. (2013). Faith development, religious styles and biographical narratives: Methodological perspectives. Journal of Empirical Theology, 26, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. La Cour, P., & Götke, P. (2012). Understanding of the word “spirituality” by theologians compared to lay people: An empirical study from a secular region. Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, 18(3–4), 97–109. doi: 10.1080/08854726.2012.720543
  29. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In I. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society (pp. 12–44). Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lee, L. (2014). Secular or nonreligious? Investigating and interpreting generic ‘not religious’ categories and populations. Religion, 44(3), 466–482. doi: 10.1080/0048721x.2014.904035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Luhrmann, T. (2012). When god talks back. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  32. Luhrmann, T. (2013). Building on William James: The role of learning in religious experience. In D. Xygalatas & W. McCorkle Jr. (Eds.), Mental culture: Classical social theory and the cognitive science of religion (pp. 145–163). Durham: Acumen.Google Scholar
  33. McCauley, R., & Lawson, E. (2002). Bringing ritual to mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCutcheon, R. (1997). Manufacturing religion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. McCutcheon, R. (2007). “They licked the platter clean”: On the co-dependency of the religious and the secular. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 19(3/4), 173–199.Google Scholar
  36. Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Park, C. (2013). Religion and meaning. In R. Paloutzian & C. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed., pp. 357–379). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  38. Silver, C. F., Coleman, T. J., III., Hood, R. W., Jr., & Holcombe, J. M. (2014). The six types of nonbelief: A qualitative and quantitative study of type and narrative. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 17, 990–1001. doi: 10.1080/13674676.2014.987743
  39. Stone, J. (2012). Spirituality for naturalists. Zygon, 47(3), 481–500. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01279.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Streib, H. (2001). Faith development theory revisited: The religious styles perspective. The International Journal for The Psychology of Religion, 11(3), 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Streib, H., & Hood, R. (2013). Modeling the religious field: Religion, spirituality, mysticism and related world views. Implicit Religion, 16(3), 137–155.Google Scholar
  42. Taves, A. (2009). Religious experience reconsidered. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Vergote, A. (1997). Religion, belief and unbelief. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Xygalatas, D. (2012). The burning saints. Bristol, CT: Equinox.Google Scholar
  45. Zinnbauer, B., Pargament, K., Cole, B., Rye, M., Butter, E., & Belavich, T. et al. (1997). Religion and spirituality: Unfuzzying the fuzzy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 549–564.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas J. ColemanIII
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anne Swhajor-Biesemann
    • 2
  • Derek Giamundo
    • 1
  • Christopher Vance
    • 1
  • Ralph W. HoodJr.
    • 1
  • Christopher F. Silver
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of Tennessee at ChattanoogaChattanoogaUSA
  2. 2.University of BielefeldBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations