Advertisement

“…I Really Did Depend on My Faith in God During that Time … to See the Meaning in My Life.”—Religious Spiritualities

  • Michele WollertEmail author
  • Barbara Keller
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter looks at case studies of individuals in the research project who show characteristics of being both “religious” and “spiritual” in traditional religious contexts. Self-identification in both categories can occur at different phases of the life span, including young adults who are “coming of age” as well as participants who are further along in the life span. By comparing and contrasting the different case studies, assumptions may be developed regarding the developmental and differential aspects of “religious” spiritualities. For each participant, Faith Development Interview scoring and participant totals on other measures dealing with constructs such as mysticism , generativity , attitudes toward God, and attachment will be examined. Three American case studies are explored in detail to better understand the trajectories of “spiritual” individuals in the more pluralistic religious arena in US culture.

Keywords

Theism Spirituality Religion Faith development 

References

  1. Bluck, S., & Habermas, T. (2000). The life story schema. Motivation and Emotion, 24(2), 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Erikson, E. H. (1982). The life cycle completed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  3. Fonagy, P., Target, M., Steele, H., & Steele, M. (1998). Reflective-functioning manual version 5 for application to adult attachment interviews. London: University College London.Google Scholar
  4. Foster, D. A., Blowers, P. M., Dunnavant, A. L., & Williams, D. N. (2004). Encyclopedia of the Stone-Campbell movement. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  5. Fowler, J. W. (1981). Stages of faith. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  6. Fowler, J. W., Streib, H., & Keller, B. (2004). Manual for faith development research. Bielefeld: Research Center for Biographical Studies in Contemporary Religion.Google Scholar
  7. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 140–150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Granqvist, P. (2010). Religion as attachment: The Godin award lecture. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 32, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Habermas, T. (2011). Autobiographical reasoning: Arguing and narrating from a biographical perspective. In T. Habermas (Ed.), The development of autobiographical reasoning in adolescence and beyond. New directions for child and adolescent development 131, pp. 1–17).Google Scholar
  12. Hood, R. W., Ghorbani, N., Watson, P. J., Ghramaleki, A. F., Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., ... Williamson, W. P. (2001). Dimensions of the Mysticism Scale: Confirming the three-factor structure in the United States and Iran. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40(4), 691–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keller, B., & Streib, H. (2013). Faith development, religious styles and biographical narratives: Methodological perspectives. Journal of Empirical Theology, 26, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1992). An attachment-theory approach to the psychology of religion. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In I. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Proceedings of the 1966 annual spring meeting of the American Ethnological Society (pp. 12–44). Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  16. McAdams, D., Reynolds, J., Lewis, M., Patten, A., & Bowman, P. (2001). When bad things turn good and good things turn bad: Sequences of redemption and contamination in life narrative and their relation to psychosocial adaptation in midlife adults and in students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 474–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McAdams, D. P., & de St. Aubin, E. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 1003–1015.Google Scholar
  18. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Parks, S. D. (1986). The critical years: Young adults and the search for meaning, faith, and commitment. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  20. Parks, S. D. (2000). Big questions, worthy dreams: Mentoring young adults in their search for meaning, purpose, and faith. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Piepkorn, A. C. (1977). Profiles in belief: The religious bodies the United States and Canada (Vol. 2, Protestant Denominations). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  22. Ryff, C., & Keyes, C. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Saroglou, V. (2010). Religiousness as a cultural adaptation of basic traits: A five-factor model perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 108–125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Staudinger, U. M., Smith, J., & Baltes, P. B. (1994). Manual for the assessment of wisdom-related knowledge. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for Human Development and Education.Google Scholar
  25. Streib, H. (2005). Faith development research revisited: Accounting for diversity in structure, content, and narrativity of faith. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15(2), 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Streib, H., Hood, R., & Klein, C. (2010). The religious schema scale: Construction and initial validation of a quantitative measure for religious styles. International Journal for Psychology of Religion, 20(3), 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Tennessee at ChattanoogaChattanoogaUSA
  2. 2.University of BielefeldBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations