Advertisement

Narrative Reconstruction and Content Analysis in the Interpretation of “Spiritual” Biographical Trajectories for Case Studies

  • Barbara KellerEmail author
  • Thomas J. Coleman III
  • Christopher F. Silver
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter we explain how we construct case studies, including analyses of narrative and content of the FDI. We take as point of departure the location of the case under study in the chart of openness to experience / mysticism . Then we proceed in direction of increasing depth of interpretation and compare the case under study with the respective focus group : First we present the results of central scales from our questionnaire, covering measures of personality , adult development and, of course, religiosity, second we turn to semantics and, in some case studies, inspect the individual semantic differentials with those of the respective focus group. Next, we present the “classic” FDI evaluation, ratings according to the Manual for faith development research along with exploratory evaluations of proxies for current concepts we consider to include. Then we turn to the FDI for a deeper analysis of content and narrative. Finally, we draw results from the different research methods together, thus achieving triangulation on the level of the single case. Now we first discuss the analysis of narrative and content and, in the second part of the chapter, we show how these are included in a case study .

Keywords

Narrative Narrative analysis Content analysis Faith development interview Case study 

References

  1. Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1985). Attachments across the life-span. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 61, 792–812.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, J. G., Fonagy, P., & Bateman, A. W. (2008). Mentalizing in clinical practice. Washington, DC, London: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Baltes, P. B. (2004). Wisdom as orchestration of mind and virtue. (internet publication), http://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/dok/full/baltes/orchestr/index.htm
  4. Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U., & Staudinger, U. M. (2006). Life span theory in developmental psychology. In R. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Theoretical models of human development (Vol. 1). Hoboken: John Wiley. Google Scholar
  5. Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2004). Psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: Mentalization based treatment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bluck, S., & Habermas, T. (2000). The life story schema. Motivation and Emotion, 24(2), 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Bowlby, J. (1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. British Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 201–210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Coleman, T. J., Silver, C. F., & Holcombe, J. (2013). Focusing on horizontal transcendence: Much more than a “non-belief”. Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism, 21(2), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dittmann-Kohli, F., & Baltes, P. B. (1990). Toward a neofunctionalist conception of adult intellectual development. Wisdom as a prototypical case of intellectual growth. In C. Alexander & E. Langer (Eds.), Higher stages of human development: Perspectives on adultgrowth (pp. 54–78). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fonagy, P., Jurist, E., Gergely, G., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (2007). Playing with reality IV. A theory of external reality rooted in intersubjectivity. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88, 917–937.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fonagy, P., Target, M., Steele, H., & Steele, M. (1998). Reflective-functioning manual Version 5 for application to Adult Attachment Interviews. Google Scholar
  15. Fonagy, P., Twemlow, S. W., Vernberg, E. M., Nelson, J. M., Dill, E. J., Little, T. D., & Sargent, J. A. (2009). A cluster randomized controlled trial of child-focused psychiatric consultation and a school systems-focused intervention to reduce aggression. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(5), 607–616.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fowler, J. W. (1981). Stages of faith. San Francisco: Harper & ROW.Google Scholar
  17. Fowler, J. W., Streib, H., & Keller, B. (2004). Manual for faith development research. Bielefeld: Research Center for Biographical Studies in Contemporary Religion.Google Scholar
  18. Fuller, R. C. (2013). The body of faith. A biological history of religion in America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. (2010). Scanning the landscape of narrative enquiry. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(9), 728–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Granqvist, P. (2010). Religion as attachment: The Godin Award lecture. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 32, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Granqvist, P., & Hagekull, B. (1999). Religiousness and perceived childhood attachment: Profiling socialized correspondence and emotional compensation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38, 254–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Habermas, T. (2006). Who speaks? Who looks? Who feels? Point of view in autobiographical narratives. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 2, 497–518.Google Scholar
  25. Habermas, T. (2010). Autobiographical reasoning: Arguing and narrating from a biographical perspective. In T. Habermas (Ed.), The development of autobiographical reasoning in adolescence and beyond. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development (Vol. 131, pp. 1–17).Google Scholar
  26. Habermas, T., & Berger, N. (2011). Retelling everyday emotional events: Condensation, distancing, and closure. Cognition and Emotion, 25(2), 206–219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hood, R. W., Hill, P. C., & Williamson, W. P. (2005). The psychology of religious fundamentalism. New York/London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  29. Keller, B., Klein, C., & Streib, H. (2013). Das faith development interview. Zur Exploration von Spiritualität im psychotherapeutischen Setting [The faith development interview. Exploring spirituality in psychotherapeutic settings]. Spiritual Care, 1, 35–43.Google Scholar
  30. Keller, B., & Streib, H. (2013). Faith development, religious styles and biographical narratives: Methodological perspectives. Journal of Empirical Theology, 26, 1–21.Google Scholar
  31. Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1992). An attachment-theory approach to the psychology of religion. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2005). Attachment, evolution, and the psychology of religion. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  33. Labov, W. (2013). The language of life and death. The transfomation of experience in oral narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In I. Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Proceedings of the 1966 annual spring meeting of the American Ethnological Society (pp. 12–44). Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  35. Main, M., Hesse, E., & Kaplan, N. (2005). Predictability of attachment behaviour and representational processes at 1, 6, and 18 years of age: The Berkeley longitudinal study. In K. E. Grossmann, K. Grossmann, & E. Waters (Eds.), Attachment from infancy to adulthood (pp. 245–304). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  36. McAdams, D. P. (1990). The person. An introduction to personality psychology. San Diego: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  37. McAdams, D. P. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  38. McAdams, D. P., Albaugh, M., Farber, E., Daniels, J., Logan, R. L., & Olson, B. (2008). Family metaphors and moral intuitions: How conservatives and liberals narrate their lives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 978–990.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. McAdams, D. P., Josselson, R., & Lieblich, A. (Eds.). (2001). Turns in the road: Narrative studies of lives in transition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  40. Miller, P. (1975). Errand into the wilderness. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  41. Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, D.K. (2009). Moral identity and the development of moral character. In D. Medin, L. Skitka, D. Bartels, & C. Bauman (Eds.), Moral cognition and decision making, Vol. 50 of the Psychology of Learning and Motivation series (pp. 237–274). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  42. Osgood, C. E. (1962). Studies on the generality of affective meaning systems. American Anthropologist, 17, 10–28.Google Scholar
  43. Osgood, C. E., Luria, Z., Jeans, R. F., & Smith, S. W. (1976). The three faces of Evelyn: A case report. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85(3), 247–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pasupathi, M., Mansour,  E., & Brubaker, J. R. (2007). Developing a life story: Constructing relations between self and experience in autobiographical narratives. Human Development, 50, 85–110. Google Scholar
  45. Rizzuto, A. M. (1979). The birth of the living God. A psychoanalytic study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rudden, M. G., Milrod, B., Aronson, A., & Target, M. (2008). Reflective functioning in panic disorder patients. Clinical observations and research design. In F. N. Busch (Ed.), Mentalization. theoretical considerations, research findings, and clinical implications. New York/London: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Snider, J. G., & Osgood, C. E. (1969). Semantic differential technique: A sourcebook. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  48. Staudinger, U. M., Smith, J., & Baltes, P. B. (1994). Manual for the assessment of wisdom-related knowledge. Materialien aus der Bildungsforschung; 46, Berlin: Max-Planck-Inst. für Bildungsforschung. Google Scholar
  49. Streib, H. (1991). Hermeneutics of metaphor, symbol and narrative in Faith Development Theory. European University Studies, Ser.23 (Vol. 408). Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  50. Streib, H. (1997). Religion als Stilfrage. Zur Revision struktureller Differenzierung von Religion im Blick auf die Analyse der pluralistisch-religiösen Lage der Gegenwart [Religion as a question of style: Revising the structural differentiation of religion in respect to an analysis of the current pluralistic religious situation]. Archive for the Psychology of Religion/Archiv für Religionspsychologie, 22, 48–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Streib, H. (2001). Faith development theory revisited: The religious styles perspective. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 11, 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Streib, H. (2003a). Religion as a question of style: Revising the structural differentiation of religion from the perspective of the analysis of the contemporary pluralistic-religious situation. International Journal for Practical Theology, 7, 1–22.Google Scholar
  53. Streib, H. (2003b). Faith development research at twenty years. In R. R. Osmer & F. Schweitzer (Eds.), Developing a public faith. New directions in practical theology. Essays in honor of James. W. Fowler (pp. 15-42). St. Louis: Chalice Press. Google Scholar
  54. Streib, H. (2005). Faith development research revisited: Accounting for diversity in structure, content, and narrativity of faith. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15, 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Streib, H. (2013). Conceptualisation et mesure du developpement religieux en termes de schemas et de styles religieux—resultats et nouvelles considerations [Conceptualization and measurement of religious development in terms of religious schemata and religious styles]. In P.-Y. Brandt & J. M. Day (Eds.), Psychologie du développement religieux: Questions classiques et perspectives contemporaines. Geneva: Labor et Fides.Google Scholar
  56. Streib, H., & Hood, R. W. (2011). “Spirituality” as privatized experience-oriented religion: Empirical and conceptual perspectives. Implicit Religion, 14(4), 433–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Streib, H., & Hood, R. W. (2013). Modeling the religious field: Religion, spirituality, mysticism, and related world views. Implicit Religion, 16(2), 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Streib, H., Hood, R., & Klein, C. (2010). The religious schema scale: Construction and initial validation of a quantitative measure for religious styles. International Journal for Psychology of Religion, 20(3), 151–172.Google Scholar
  59. Streib, H., Hood, R. W., Keller, B., Csöff, R.-M., & Silver, C. (2009). Deconversion. Qualitative and quantitative results from cross-cultural research in Germany and the United States of America. Research in contemporary religion, 5. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  60. Taves, A. (2009). Religious experience reconsidered. A building block approach to the study of religion and other special things. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Winnicott, D. W. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 34, 89–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Keller
    • 1
    Email author
  • Thomas J. Coleman III
    • 2
  • Christopher F. Silver
    • 2
  1. 1.University of BielefeldBielefeldGermany
  2. 2.University of Tennessee at ChattanoogaChattanoogaUSA

Personalised recommendations