Enhancing the Tactical Data Link Decision Support System

Chapter
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 42)

Abstract

Coordinating a complex array of deployed assets is a difficult task. Defence employs Tactical Data Link (TDL)s to maintain situation awareness and convey the intent of command and control information. Connectivity is achieved using digital radio communication systems that conform to present military TDL standard waveforms. Managing a TDL is inherently complex and typically requires operators (called TDL Network Managers (TDLNMs)) to actively manage these networks. These TDLNMs are trained military personnel and, due to the transient nature of their careers, most are posted within a few years and are often replaced with less experienced operators. Given this fluctuating level of experience, a Decision Support System (DSS) is being considered to assist the operators in maintaining a network. This chapter describes the conceptual design of an agent-based DSS, that could be used to support an operator, who is responsible for monitoring and optimizing a TDL. This includes tasks such as monitoring, troubleshooting and modifying various aspects of the TDL in order to maintain the required levels of connectivity and performance. One of the key tools used to support this role is a computer-based Network Management System (NMS). The proposed DSS could be developed using an Agent Architecture Framework (AAF) and integrated with the DSS based on Distributed Object Computing (DOC) technology. This approach minimizes the risk of integration between the NMS and the DSS, whilst allowing flexibility for future integration requirements. Cognitive Work Analysis (CWA) techniques could also be employed to capture and encode the expertise required for the DSS to operate effectively.

Keywords

Agent Cognitive work analysis Decision support system  Distributed object computing Network manager Tactical data link Software oriented architecture 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge the contribution of William Scott (performed through collaboration with the University of South Australia) in support of the research described in this chapter. In particular, the customized decision ladder and generic task template.

References

  1. 1.
    DoD: Tactical data link (TDL) 16 message standard. Military Standard - Revision E, Defense Information Systems Agency, United States Department of Defense, Arlington County, Virginia (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hura, M., McLeod, G., Schneider, J., Gonzales, D., Norton, D.M., Jacobs, J., O’Connell, K.M., Little, W., Mesic, R., Jamison, L: Interoperability: A Continuing Challenge in Coalition Air Operations. Number MR-1235-AF. Rand Corporation, p. 272. Santa MOnica, California (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tobin, B., Baillie, C., Sioutis, C.: Achieving high fidelity tactical data link simulations through modelling of radio transmissions. In: Simulation Technology, Adelaide Convention Centre, South Australia (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Basagni, S., Conti, M., Giordano, S., Stojmenovic, I.: Mobile Ad hoc Networking (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Freeman, R.L.: Fundamentals of Telecommunications, 2nd edn. Wiley, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Hoboken, N.J. (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    HQ TRADOC: Introduction to tactical digital information link J and quick reference guide. Quick Reference Guide ADA404334, Army training and doctrine command, Fortmontroe, VA (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gore, A.: JTIDS/MIDS frequency clearance agreement FCA management. In: International Data Link Symposium, SyntheSys, UK (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson, M.: MIDS link 16 network design and management. In: JTIDS/MIDS Link 16 Network Design and Management, NICTA, Canberra, ACT, SyntheSys Australia (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ding, Y., Sioutis, C., Baillie, C., Tobin, B., Scott, W.: Human machine interface analysis through cognitive modelling. Australian International Aerospace Congress (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vincente, K.J.: CongnitiveWork Analysis: Towards Safe, Productive and Healthy Computer-Based Work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associatesn, Mahwah, NJ, USA (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A.M., Goodstein, L.P.: Cognitive Systems Engineering. Wiley (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hutton, R.J.B., Klein, G.: Expert decision making. Syst. Eng. 2(1), 32–45 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bodker, S.: Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach to User Interfaces. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1990)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wooldridge, M.: Reasoning about rational agents. In: Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England (June 2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Padgham, L., Winikoff, M.: Developing Intelligent Agent Systems: A Practical Guide. Wiley, West Sussex, England (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    AOS: JACK Intelligent Agents: Users Manual. Agent-Oriented Software, Carlton, Melbourne. Release 4.1 edn. (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bellifemine, F., Caire, G., Trucco, T., Rimassa, G.: Jade Programmer’s Guide (June 2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Laird, J.E., Congdon, C.B.: The soar user’s manual. Technical report, University of Michigan, MI, United States (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weiss, M.: Patterns for motivating an agent-based approach. In: Jeusfeld, M.A., Pastor, O. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling for Novel Application Domains. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2814, pp. 229–240. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oluyomi, A., Karunasekera, S., Sterling, L.: Description templates for agent-oriented patterns. J. Syst. Softw. 81(1), 20–36 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jayatilleke, G.B., Padgham, L., Winikoff, M.: A model driven component-based development framework for agents. Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng. 20(4), 273–282 (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sioutis, C., Dominish, D.: Developing intelligent agents with distributed computing middleware. In: Watada, J., Phillips-Wren, G., Jain, L., Howlett, R. (eds.) Intelligent Decision Technologies. Smart Innovation. Volume 10, Systems and Technologies, pp. 863–872. Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schmidt, D.C., Stal M., Rohnert H., Buschmann F.: Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: Patterns for Concurrent and Networked Objects. Wiley (2000)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    OMG: Common object request broker architecture corba specification. Technical Report Version 3.1, Object Management Group, Needham, MA, USA (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cheng Tao, C.T., Guan Zailin, G.Z., Liu Liming, L.L., Wu Bo, W.B., Yang Shuzi, Y.S.: A corba-based multi-agent system integration framework. In: Ninth IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, pp. 191–198. (2004)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Melo, F., Choren, R., Cerqueira, R., de Lucena, C.J.P., Blois, M.: Deploying agents with the corba component model. In Emmerich, W., Wolf, A.L., (eds.) Component Deployment. Volume 3083 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 234–247. Springer (2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Otte, W., Kinnebrew, J., Schmidt, D., Biswas, G.: A flexible infrastructure for distributed deployment in adaptive sensor webs. In: Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–12. IEEE Computer Society Press, USA (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Defence Science and Technology OrganisationEdinburghAustralia

Personalised recommendations