Abstract
Geriatric medicine deals with old, very old, patients who frequently are in need of help and care because of their higher risk for losses of physical, cognitive, emotional and social function. The situation of these vulnerable, frail patients often is not adequately taken care of by our social and healthcare system. Decisions about medical interventions are easier when the patients concerned have an intact decisional capacity. This situation becomes more complex and difficult when dealing with multimorbid, frequently cognitively impaired very old individuals. The big ethical challenge for interventional cardiology is to provide the solid evidence of an overall benefit of the invasive procedure translating into an individually acceptable improved quality of life of the geriatric patient. Only good facts make good ethical decision-making possible.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Austrian Bioethics Commission. Recommendations for the terminology of medical decisions in end-of-life Situations. 2011. https://www.bka.gv.at/DocView.axd?CobId=46713. Accessed 9 Jan 2015.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
Boothroyd LJ, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: recommendations for practice based on a multidisciplinary review including cost-effectiveness and ethical and organizational issues. Can J Cardiol. 2013;6:718–26.
Borasio GD. Lecture at the 66th annual German Jurist’s conference, Stuttgart, 20 Sept 2006.
Cameron AA, et al. Ethical issues for invasive cardiologists: society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;61:157–62.
Chen PW. Final exam – a surgeon’s reflections on mortality. New York: Knopf, Random House; 2007.
Ellershaw J, Ward C. Care of the dying patient: the last hours or days of life. BMJ. 2003;326:30–4.
Ellis G, et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older hospital patients. Br Med Bull. 2004;71:45–59.
Gawande A. Being mortal – illness, medicine and what matters in the end. Metropolitan Books, Henry Holt & Co. New York
Hawkins BM, et al. High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in the Era of public reporting – clinical and ethical considerations in the care of the elderly patient with critical left main disease and shock. Circulation. 2014;129:258–65.
Junod JP, Martin E. Ein kurzes Lehrbuch der Geriatrie. Bern: Huber; 1984.
Körtner U. Grundkurs Pflegeethik. Wien: Facultas; 2004.
Kunzmann P. dtv Atlas der Philosophie. Munich: DTV; 1996.
Levine GN, et al. ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011. doi:10.1002/ccd.23438.
Loewy EH. Textbook of health care ethics. New York: Plenum Press; 1996.
Loewy EH. Ethics and evidence-based medicine: Is there a conflict? Medscape Internal Medicine. 2007. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/559977_2. Accessed 7 Jan 2015.
Loewy EH, Loewy RS. The ethics of terminal illness: orchestrating the end of life. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000.
Loewy EH, Loewy-Springer R. Textbook of healthcare ethics. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004.
Marckmann G, in der Schmitten J. Begrenzung lebenserhaltender Maßnahmen – eine Handreichung für die Praxis auf der Grundlage der aktuellen Gesetzgebung. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2010;145:570–4.
Morrison RS, Meier DE. Geriatric palliative care. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
Ohldieck AE, et al. Implementation of transcatheter aortic valve insertion (TAVI) in clinical practice: an ethical analysis. Clin Ethics. 2014;9(2–3):96–103.
Otto CM, et al. Aortic-valve stenosis – from patients at risk to severe valve obstruction. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:744–56.
Pauer-Studer H. Einführung in die Ethik. Wien: Facultas; 2003.
Pöltner G. Grundkurs Medizin-Ethik. Facultas, Wien; 2002.
Rehbock T. Autonomie, Fürsorge, Paternalismus – zur Kritik medizin-ethischer Grundbegriffe. Z Ethik Med. 2002;3:131–50.
SAMW (Schweizerische Akademie der Medizinischen Wissenschaften). Medizin-ethische Richtlinien Betreuung von Patientinnen und Patienten am Lebensende. (2004, update 2012) http://www.samw.ch/de/Ethik/Richtlinien/Aktuell-gueltige-Richtlinien.html. Aaccessed 15 Jan 2015.
Schneiderman LJ, et al. Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:949–54.
Schneiderman LJ, et al. Medical futility: response to critiques. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:669–74.
Schoenenberger AW, et al. Predictors of functional decline in elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Eur Heart J. 2013;34(9):684–92.
Schoenenberger AW, et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation-rationale and design of the European CGA-TAVI registry. Eur Geriatr Med. 2014;5:8–13.
Steinkamp N, Gordinj B. Ethik in Klinik – Ein Arbeitsbuch. Neuwied: Luchterhand; 2003.
Ungar A. A call to action – geriatrician’s experience in treatment of aortic stenosis and involvement on transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Geriatr Med. 2013;4:176–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frühwald, T. (2015). Ethical Aspects of Interventional Cardiology in Geriatric Patients. In: Rittger, H. (eds) Interventional Cardiology in the Elderly. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21142-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21142-8_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21141-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21142-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)