Abstract
The construction of an appropriate performance measurement system is an important objective that every company is facing today. Firms using sustained performance measurement systems in management achieve higher efficiency. An identification of solutions in performance measurement applied in Polish enterprises has been made and is based on the analysis of the existing relations between the size of the company, the economic sector, variables describing development strategy and measurements of its implementation, as well as the performance measurement organization. Dependences occurred among the variables: character and the frequency of applied aims measures, possession or not of a development strategy, indicators and economic-financial variables and the way of connecting exploited measures with the motivation system.
The source of the data for the contingency tables was a nationwide survey conducted by the CATI method, which was covered by 300 Polish companies (National Science Centre Project number N N115 436640 “Key indicators of performance management”). Identification was accomplished by the chosen statistical tests and measures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
National Science Centre Project number N N115 436640 “Key indicators of performance management”.
References
Andersson P, Aronsson H, Storhagen NG (1989) Measuring logistics performance. Eng Costs Prod Econ 17:253–262
Azzone G, Masella C, Bertele U (1991) Design of performance measures for time-based companies. Int J Oper Prod Manag 11(3):77–85
Batóg B, Batóg J, Niemiec A, Skoczylas W, Waśniewski P (2015) Zastosowanie metod klasyfikacyjnychw identyfikacji kluczowych indykatorów osiągnięć w zarządzaniu wynikami przedsiębiorstw, in print
Bititci U, Turner T, Begemann C (2000) Dynamics of performance measurement systems. Int J Oper Prod Manag 20(6):692–704
Bititci U, Suwignjo P, Carrie A (2001) Strategy management through quantitative modelling of performance measurement systems. Int J Prod Econ 69:15–22
Bourne M, Mills J, Wilcox M, Neely A, Platts K (2000) Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. Int J Oper Prod Manag 20(7):754–771
Crawford K (1988) An analysis of performance measurement systems in selected just-in-time operations. Dissertation, University of Georgia
Dixon J, Nanni A, Vollmann T (1990) The new performance measurement challenge: measuring operations for world-class competition. Dow Jones-Irwin/APICS, Homewood, IL
Eccles RG (1991) The performance measurement manifesto. Harv Bus Rev 69(1):131–137
Fawcett SE, Cooper MB (1998) Logistics performance measurement, and customer success. Ind Mark Manag 27:341–357
Flapper SD, Fortuin L, Stoop PPM (1996) Towards consistent performance measurement systems. Int J Oper Prod Manag 16(7):27–37
Fortuin L (1988) Performance indicators––why where and how? Eur J Oper Res 34:1–9
Fransoo JC, Wouters MJF (2000) Measuring the bullwhip effect in a supply chain. Supply Chain Manag 5(2):78–89
Globerson S (1985) Issues in developing a performance criteria system for an organisation. Int J Prod Res 23(4):639–646
Grady M (1991) Performance measurement: implementing strategy. Manag Account 72(12):49–53
Haffer R (2011) Samoocena i pomiar wyników działalności w systemach zarządzania. W poszukiwaniu doskonałości biznesowej. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń
Kaplan R, Norton D (1992) The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev 70(1):71–79
Kaplan R, Norton D (1996) Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harv Bus Rev 74(1):75–85
Kennerley M, Neely A (2003) Measuring performance in a changing business environment. Int J Oper Prod Manag 23(2):213–229
Kueng P (2001) Performance measurement systems in the service sector – the potential of IT is not yet utilized. Internal working paper no. 01–05, Fribourg
Lebas M (1995) Oui, il faut définir la performance. Revue Française de Comptabilité 226
Lingle JH, Schiemann WA (1996) From balanced scorecard to strategy gauge, is measurement worth it? Manag Rev March:56–62. By: Haffer R, Samoocena i pomiar wyników działalności w systemach zarządzania. W poszukiwaniu doskonałości biznesowej, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń, p 325
Lockamy A III (1991) A study of operational and strategic performance measurement systems in selected world class manufacturing firms: an examination of linkages for competitive advantage. Dissertation, University of Georgia
Marchand M, Raymond L (2008) Researching performance measurement systems – an information systems perspective. Int J Oper Prod Manag 28(7):663–686
Marr B, Neely A (2002) Balanced scorecard software report. Gartner, Inc. and Cranfield School of Management, Stamford
Medori D, Steeple D (2000) A framework for auditing and enhancing performance measurement systems. Int J Oper Prod Manag 20(5):520–533
Neely A, Mills J, Gregory M, Platts K (1995) Performance measurement system design – a literature review and research agenda. Int J Oper Prod Manag 15(4):80–116
Nudurupati SS, Bititci US (2000) Review of performance management information systems (PerforMIS). Internal report, Centre for Strategic Manufacturing, DMEM, University of Strathclyde
Spitzer D (2010) Preface. In: Tyagi RK, Gupta P (eds) Strategiczna karta wyników firm usługowych. Wydawnictwo Profesjonalne PWN, Warszawa, pp 15–16
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Chosen research questions mentioned in the article:
-
R1
Q: Size of the company (enterprise)
A: Small, medium, big
-
O1
Q: Have You developed a strategy of Your company?
A:
-
1.
Yes,
-
2.
No
-
1.
-
O2
Q: Does the company’s strategy besides the descriptive part includes also company’s aims measures?
A:
-
1.
Yes, it does,
-
2.
No, the aims of the strategy are expressed only descriptively
-
1.
-
O3
Q: What types of measures are applied in Your company?
A:
-
1.
Mainly or solely financial, e.g. profit, turnover, assets, profitability
-
2.
Above all others non-financial, not expressed in money (currency), e.g. number of employed, work efficiency, number of clients, customer’s loyalty, customer satisfaction, working time,
-
3.
Both financial and nonfinancial
-
4.
None of tchem.
-
1.
-
O5
Q: On which levels the performance measurement is calculated by the company?
A:
-
1.
The company as a whole,
-
2.
Organizational units,
-
3.
Individual employees.
-
1.
-
O7
Q: In what way is the performance measurement in the company organized?
A:
-
1.
a senior position was distinguished for the performance measurement
-
2.
run only by the accounting department
-
3.
conducted by all units within their competence
-
1.
-
O8
Q: Are measures used in Your company form:
A:
-
1.
a set of unrelated, other for each department, financial measures,
-
2.
a set of unrelated, other for each department, financial and nonfinancial measures,
-
3.
a set of unrelated, other for each department, nonfinancial measures,
-
4.
ordered system of financial measures such as DuPont Model, ZVEI
-
5.
create an orderly system of financial and nonfinancial measures, such as Balanced Scorecard, Performance Prism, EFQM
-
6.
Do not know, hard to say
-
1.
-
O10
Q: Are the performance measures or are they not related to motivation system in Your company?
A:
-
1.
Yes, it is regarding all employees,
-
2.
Yes, but is regarding only chosen groups of employees,
-
3.
No
-
1.
-
O12
Q: What is the aim of usage of performance measures in the company?
A:
-
1.
To measure and assess the achievements of the company
-
2.
To refine the vision and strategy
-
3.
To explain the objectives and the integrate these measures with strategic management system
-
4.
For planning, setting objectives and strategic decision-making
-
5.
For internal communication
-
6.
To improve systems for monitoring the strategy realisation and organizational learning
-
7.
To improve operational processes such as increasing the employees productivity, improve the quality
-
8.
To control the current economic activity
-
9.
To motivate employees
-
10.
For external reporting
-
11.
To fulfill specific legal requirements and technology
-
12.
Other aims
-
1.
-
O12A
-
1.
few areas of application (0–5)
-
2.
many areas of application (6–12)
-
1.
-
S4
Are leading PKD section of Your company is: Manufacturing (B, C, D, E), Construction (section F), Trade and repair (G), Transportation and storage (H), Services I (I, J), Services II (L, M, N)?
-
S5
Q: Since when is the company conducting its activity?
A:
-
1.
To 1 year
-
2.
1–3 years
-
3.
4–5 years
-
4.
6–10 years
-
5.
10 years and more
-
6.
Don’t know, hard to say
-
1.
-
S6
Q: What is the origin of the company’s capital:
A:
-
1.
Polish private equity
-
2.
Polish national equity
-
3.
Foreign capital
-
4.
Mixed capital
-
1.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Batóg, B., Batóg, J., Niemiec, A., Skoczylas, W., Waśniewski, P. (2016). Identification of Performance Measurement Systems Applied in Polish Enterprises. In: Dudycz, T., Osbert-Pociecha, G., Brycz, B. (eds) The Essence and Measurement of Organizational Efficiency. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21139-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21139-8_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21138-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21139-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)