Skip to main content

Identification of Performance Measurement Systems Applied in Polish Enterprises

  • Conference paper
The Essence and Measurement of Organizational Efficiency

Abstract

The construction of an appropriate performance measurement system is an important objective that every company is facing today. Firms using sustained performance measurement systems in management achieve higher efficiency. An identification of solutions in performance measurement applied in Polish enterprises has been made and is based on the analysis of the existing relations between the size of the company, the economic sector, variables describing development strategy and measurements of its implementation, as well as the performance measurement organization. Dependences occurred among the variables: character and the frequency of applied aims measures, possession or not of a development strategy, indicators and economic-financial variables and the way of connecting exploited measures with the motivation system.

The source of the data for the contingency tables was a nationwide survey conducted by the CATI method, which was covered by 300 Polish companies (National Science Centre Project number N N115 436640 “Key indicators of performance management”). Identification was accomplished by the chosen statistical tests and measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    National Science Centre Project number N N115 436640 “Key indicators of performance management”.

References

  • Andersson P, Aronsson H, Storhagen NG (1989) Measuring logistics performance. Eng Costs Prod Econ 17:253–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzone G, Masella C, Bertele U (1991) Design of performance measures for time-based companies. Int J Oper Prod Manag 11(3):77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batóg B, Batóg J, Niemiec A, Skoczylas W, Waśniewski P (2015) Zastosowanie metod klasyfikacyjnychw identyfikacji kluczowych indykatorów osiągnięć w zarządzaniu wynikami przedsiębiorstw, in print

    Google Scholar 

  • Bititci U, Turner T, Begemann C (2000) Dynamics of performance measurement systems. Int J Oper Prod Manag 20(6):692–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bititci U, Suwignjo P, Carrie A (2001) Strategy management through quantitative modelling of performance measurement systems. Int J Prod Econ 69:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne M, Mills J, Wilcox M, Neely A, Platts K (2000) Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. Int J Oper Prod Manag 20(7):754–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford K (1988) An analysis of performance measurement systems in selected just-in-time operations. Dissertation, University of Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon J, Nanni A, Vollmann T (1990) The new performance measurement challenge: measuring operations for world-class competition. Dow Jones-Irwin/APICS, Homewood, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles RG (1991) The performance measurement manifesto. Harv Bus Rev 69(1):131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett SE, Cooper MB (1998) Logistics performance measurement, and customer success. Ind Mark Manag 27:341–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flapper SD, Fortuin L, Stoop PPM (1996) Towards consistent performance measurement systems. Int J Oper Prod Manag 16(7):27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortuin L (1988) Performance indicators––why where and how? Eur J Oper Res 34:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fransoo JC, Wouters MJF (2000) Measuring the bullwhip effect in a supply chain. Supply Chain Manag 5(2):78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Globerson S (1985) Issues in developing a performance criteria system for an organisation. Int J Prod Res 23(4):639–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grady M (1991) Performance measurement: implementing strategy. Manag Account 72(12):49–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Haffer R (2011) Samoocena i pomiar wyników działalności w systemach zarządzania. W poszukiwaniu doskonałości biznesowej. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R, Norton D (1992) The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev 70(1):71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R, Norton D (1996) Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harv Bus Rev 74(1):75–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennerley M, Neely A (2003) Measuring performance in a changing business environment. Int J Oper Prod Manag 23(2):213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kueng P (2001) Performance measurement systems in the service sector – the potential of IT is not yet utilized. Internal working paper no. 01–05, Fribourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebas M (1995) Oui, il faut définir la performance. Revue Française de Comptabilité 226

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingle JH, Schiemann WA (1996) From balanced scorecard to strategy gauge, is measurement worth it? Manag Rev March:56–62. By: Haffer R, Samoocena i pomiar wyników działalności w systemach zarządzania. W poszukiwaniu doskonałości biznesowej, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń, p 325

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockamy A III (1991) A study of operational and strategic performance measurement systems in selected world class manufacturing firms: an examination of linkages for competitive advantage. Dissertation, University of Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand M, Raymond L (2008) Researching performance measurement systems – an information systems perspective. Int J Oper Prod Manag 28(7):663–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marr B, Neely A (2002) Balanced scorecard software report. Gartner, Inc. and Cranfield School of Management, Stamford

    Google Scholar 

  • Medori D, Steeple D (2000) A framework for auditing and enhancing performance measurement systems. Int J Oper Prod Manag 20(5):520–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely A, Mills J, Gregory M, Platts K (1995) Performance measurement system design – a literature review and research agenda. Int J Oper Prod Manag 15(4):80–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nudurupati SS, Bititci US (2000) Review of performance management information systems (PerforMIS). Internal report, Centre for Strategic Manufacturing, DMEM, University of Strathclyde

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer D (2010) Preface. In: Tyagi RK, Gupta P (eds) Strategiczna karta wyników firm usługowych. Wydawnictwo Profesjonalne PWN, Warszawa, pp 15–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Batóg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Chosen research questions mentioned in the article:

  1. R1

    Q: Size of the company (enterprise)

    A: Small, medium, big

  2. O1

    Q: Have You developed a strategy of Your company?

    A:

    1. 1.

      Yes,

    2. 2.

      No

  3. O2

    Q: Does the company’s strategy besides the descriptive part includes also company’s aims measures?

    A:

    1. 1.

      Yes, it does,

    2. 2.

      No, the aims of the strategy are expressed only descriptively

  4. O3

    Q: What types of measures are applied in Your company?

    A:

    1. 1.

      Mainly or solely financial, e.g. profit, turnover, assets, profitability

    2. 2.

      Above all others non-financial, not expressed in money (currency), e.g. number of employed, work efficiency, number of clients, customer’s loyalty, customer satisfaction, working time,

    3. 3.

      Both financial and nonfinancial

    4. 4.

      None of tchem.

  5. O5

    Q: On which levels the performance measurement is calculated by the company?

    A:

    1. 1.

      The company as a whole,

    2. 2.

      Organizational units,

    3. 3.

      Individual employees.

  6. O7

    Q: In what way is the performance measurement in the company organized?

    A:

    1. 1.

      a senior position was distinguished for the performance measurement

    2. 2.

      run only by the accounting department

    3. 3.

      conducted by all units within their competence

  7. O8

    Q: Are measures used in Your company form:

    A:

    1. 1.

      a set of unrelated, other for each department, financial measures,

    2. 2.

      a set of unrelated, other for each department, financial and nonfinancial measures,

    3. 3.

      a set of unrelated, other for each department, nonfinancial measures,

    4. 4.

      ordered system of financial measures such as DuPont Model, ZVEI

    5. 5.

      create an orderly system of financial and nonfinancial measures, such as Balanced Scorecard, Performance Prism, EFQM

    6. 6.

      Do not know, hard to say

  8. O10

    Q: Are the performance measures or are they not related to motivation system in Your company?

    A:

    1. 1.

      Yes, it is regarding all employees,

    2. 2.

      Yes, but is regarding only chosen groups of employees,

    3. 3.

      No

  9. O12

    Q: What is the aim of usage of performance measures in the company?

    A:

    1. 1.

      To measure and assess the achievements of the company

    2. 2.

      To refine the vision and strategy

    3. 3.

      To explain the objectives and the integrate these measures with strategic management system

    4. 4.

      For planning, setting objectives and strategic decision-making

    5. 5.

      For internal communication

    6. 6.

      To improve systems for monitoring the strategy realisation and organizational learning

    7. 7.

      To improve operational processes such as increasing the employees productivity, improve the quality

    8. 8.

      To control the current economic activity

    9. 9.

      To motivate employees

    10. 10.

      For external reporting

    11. 11.

      To fulfill specific legal requirements and technology

    12. 12.

      Other aims

  10. O12A
    1. 1.

      few areas of application (0–5)

    2. 2.

      many areas of application (6–12)

  11. S4

    Are leading PKD section of Your company is: Manufacturing (B, C, D, E), Construction (section F), Trade and repair (G), Transportation and storage (H), Services I (I, J), Services II (L, M, N)?

  12. S5

    Q: Since when is the company conducting its activity?

    A:

    1. 1.

      To 1 year

    2. 2.

      1–3 years

    3. 3.

      4–5 years

    4. 4.

      6–10 years

    5. 5.

      10 years and more

    6. 6.

      Don’t know, hard to say

  13. S6

    Q: What is the origin of the company’s capital:

    A:

    1. 1.

      Polish private equity

    2. 2.

      Polish national equity

    3. 3.

      Foreign capital

    4. 4.

      Mixed capital

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Batóg, B., Batóg, J., Niemiec, A., Skoczylas, W., Waśniewski, P. (2016). Identification of Performance Measurement Systems Applied in Polish Enterprises. In: Dudycz, T., Osbert-Pociecha, G., Brycz, B. (eds) The Essence and Measurement of Organizational Efficiency. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21139-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics