Advertisement

Synthetic Biology for Space Exploration: Promises and Societal Implications

  • Cyprien N. Verseux
  • Ivan G. Paulino-Lima
  • Mickael Baqué
  • Daniela Billi
  • Lynn J. Rothschild
Part of the Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment book series (ETHICSSCI, volume 45)

Abstract

Synthetic biology can greatly accelerate the development of human space exploration, to the point of allowing permanent human bases on Mars within our lifetime. Among the technological issues to be tackled is the need to provide the consumables required to sustain crews, and using biological systems for the on-site production of resources is an attractive approach. However, all organisms we currently know have evolved on Earth and most extraterrestrial environments stress the capabilities of even terrestrial extremophiles. Two challenges consequently arise: organisms should survive in a metabolically active state with minimal maintenance requirements, and produce compounds of interest while relying only on inputs found in the explored areas. A solution could come from the tools and methods recently developed within the field of synthetic biology. The societal implications are complex: there are implications with synthetic biology and human space colonization independently, and together there are potentially more issues. Establishing colonies relying to a large extent on modified organisms and transferring the developed technologies to terrestrial applications raises a wide range of critical ethical questions and unprecedented societal impacts, on Earth as well as on colonized planetary bodies. The scenario of humans as a multi-planet species should be addressed now, as technologies aimed at making it happen are already under development. Here we give a brief overview of the synthetic biology technologies that are being developed to aid human space exploration, before discussing the impacts of proposed medium-term scenarios on the evolution of our society.

Keywords

Synthetic Biology Directed Evolution Space Exploration Rocky Desert Planetary Body 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to those who made possible the TASynBio Summer School where this book chapter was presented: the organizers Kristin Hagen, Margret Engelhard and Georg Toepfer, the attendees for their insightful comments and friendly conversations, and the funding body: the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. They are thankful to the editors, whose comments and suggestions lead to significant improvements to the manuscript. They also thank the Italian Space Agency for supporting the BIOMEX_Cyano and BOSS_Cyano experiments. This work was supported by IGPL’s appointment to the NASA Postdoctoral Program at NASA Ames Research Center, administered by Oak Ridge Associated Universities through a contract with NASA, and by CV’s appointment to the NASA Education Associates Program managed by the Universities Space Research Association. Therefore the authors are also greatly thankful to the then Center Director S. Pete Worden.

References

  1. Aikawa S, Joseph A, Yamada R et al (2013) Direct conversion of Spirulina to ethanol without pretreatment or enzymatic hydrolysis processes. Energy Environ Sci 6:1844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich S, Newcomb J, Carlson R (2008) Scenarios for the future of synthetic biology. Ind Biotechnol 4:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen CS, Burnett R, Charles J et al (2003) Guidelines and capabilities for designing human missions. NASA/TM–2003–210785Google Scholar
  4. Allen JL (1991) Biosphere 2: the human experiment. Penguin Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Arai M, Tomita-Yokotani K, Sato S et al (2008) Growth of terrestrial cyanobacterium, Nostoc sp., on Martian Regolith Simulant and its vacuum tolerance. Biol Sci Sp 22:8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baqué M, de Vera J-P, Rettberg P, Billi D (2013) The BOSS and BIOMEX space experiments on the EXPOSE-R2 mission: endurance of the desert cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis under simulated space vacuum, Martian atmosphere, UVC radiation and temperature extremes. Acta Astronaut 91:180–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baum SD (2010) Is humanity doomed? Insights from astrobiology. Sustainability 2:591–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baker D, Zubrin R (1990) Mars direct: combining near-term technologies to achieve a two-launch manned mars mission. J Br Interplanet Soc 43:519–526Google Scholar
  9. Billi D, Wright DJ, Helm RF et al (2000) Engineering desiccation tolerance in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1680–1684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blüm V, Gitelson J, Horneck G, Kreuzberg K (1994) Opportunities and constraints of closed man-made ecological systems on the moon. Adv Sp Res 14:271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown II (2008a) Cyanobacteria to link closed ecological systems and in-situ resources utilization processes. 37th COSPAR Sci. Assem., Montréal, Canada, 13–20 July 2008Google Scholar
  12. Brown II (2008b) Mutant strains of Spirulina (Arthrospira) platensis to increase the efficiency of micro-ecological life support systems. 37th COSPAR Sci. Assem., Montréal, Canada, 13–20 July 2008Google Scholar
  13. Brown II, Sarkisova S (2008) Bio-weathering of lunar and Martian rocks by cyanobacteria: A resource for moon and mars exploration. Lunar Planet. Sci. XXXIX, League City, Texas, 10–14 Mar 2008Google Scholar
  14. Brown II, Garrison DH, Jones JA et al (2008) The development and perspectives of bio-ISRU. Jt. Annu. Meet. LEAG-ICEUM-SRR, Cape Canaveral, Florida, 28–31 Oct 2008Google Scholar
  15. Cao G, Concas A, Corrias G et al (2014) Process for the production of useful materials for sustaining manned space missions on Mars through in-situ resources utilization. US Pat. App. US20140165461 A1, 24 July 2012Google Scholar
  16. Church GM, Elowitz MB, Smolke CD et al (2014) Realizing the potential of synthetic biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15:289–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cockell CS (2010) Geomicrobiology beyond Earth: microbe-mineral interactions in space exploration and settlement. Trends Microbiol 18:308–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cockell CS (2011) Synthetic geomicrobiology: engineering microbe–mineral interactions for space exploration and settlement. Int J Astrobiol 10:315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cockell CS (2014) Trajectories of Martian habitability. Astrobiology 14:182–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Connell K, Dick SJ, Rose K et al (1999) Workshop on the societal implications of astrobiology. NASA Technical Memorandum. NASA Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, California, pp 16–17Google Scholar
  21. Conrad TM, Lewis NE, Palsson BØ (2011) Microbial laboratory evolution in the era of genome-scale science. Mol Syst Biol 7:509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cumbers J, Rothschild LJ (2010) BISRU: Synthetic microbes for moon, Mars and beyond. In: LPI Contrib. League City, Texas, 26–20 Apr 2010Google Scholar
  23. Dahlgren R, Shoji S, Nanzyo M (1993) Mineralogical characteristics of volcanic ash soils. In: Shoji S, Nanzyo M (eds) Volcanic ash soils—genesis, properties and utilization. Elsevier Science Ltd, Amsterdam, pp 101–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dalton B, Roberto F (2008) Lunar regolith biomining: workshop report. NASA/CP-2008-214564. NASA Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, California, 5–6 May 2007Google Scholar
  25. Debus A, Arnould J (2008) Planetary protection issues related to human missions to mars. Adv Sp Res 42:1120–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. de Crecy E, Jaronski S, Lyons B et al (2009) Directed evolution of a filamentous fungus for thermotolerance. BMC Biotechnol 9:74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. de Muynck W, Verbeken K, De Belie N, Verstraete W (2010) Influence of urea and calcium dosage on the effectiveness of bacterially induced carbonate precipitation on limestone. Ecol Eng 36:99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. de Vera J-P, Dulai S, Kereszturi A et al (2013) Results on the survival of cryptobiotic cyanobacteria samples after exposure to mars-like environmental conditions. Int J Astrobiol 13:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. de Vera J-P, Schulze-Makuch D, Khan A et al (2014) Adaptation of an antarctic lichen to Martian niche conditions can occur within 34 days. Planet Space Sci 98:182–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. DeVincenzi DL (1992) Planetary protection issues and the future exploration of Mars. Adv Space Res 12:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dick SJ, Launius RD (eds) (2009) Societal impact of spaceflight. NASA SP-2007-4801, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  32. Drysdale A, Ewert M, Hanford A (2003) Life support approaches for mars missions. Adv Sp Res 31:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Drysdale AE, Rutkze CJ, Albright LD, LaDue RL (2004) The minimal cost of life in space. Adv Sp Res 34:1502–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ducat DC, Way JC, Silver PA (2011) Engineering cyanobacteria to generate high-value products. Trends Biotechnol 29:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dykhuizen DE (1993) Chemostats used for studying natural selection and adaptive evolution. Methods Enzymol 224:613–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Elena SF, Lenski RE (2003) Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 4:457–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ellis DI, Goodacre R (2012) Metabolomics-assisted synthetic biology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23:22–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ESA, IAA (2005) The impact of space activities upon society. ESA-BR-237, Noordwijk, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  39. Ewing D (1995) The directed evolution of radiation resistance in E. coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 216:549–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fajardo-Cavazos P, Waters SM, Schuerger AC et al (2012) Evolution of Bacillus subtilis to enhanced growth at low pressure: up-regulated transcription of des-desKR, encoding the fatty acid desaturase system. Astrobiology 12:258–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ferrer M, Chernikova TN, Yakimov MM et al (2003) Chaperonins govern growth of Escherichia coli at low temperatures. Nat Biotechnol 21:1266–1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Folcher M, Fussenegger M (2012) Synthetic biology advancing clinical applications. Curr Opin Chem Biol 16:345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gao G, Tian B, Liu L et al (2003) Expression of Deinococcus radiodurans PprI enhances the radioresistance of Escherichia coli. DNA Repair 2(12):1419–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Giacomelli GA, Furfaro R, Kacira M et al (2012) Bio-regenerative life support system development for Lunar/Mars habitats. In: 42nd international conference on environmental systems, San Diego, California, 15–19 JulyGoogle Scholar
  45. Gitelson I, Lisovsky G, MacElroy R (2003) Manmade closed ecological systems. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Gitelson J (1992) Biological life-support systems for mars mission. Adv Sp Res 12:167–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Godia F, Albiol J, Montesinos J, Pérez J (2002) MELISSA: a loop of interconnected bioreactors to develop life support in space. J Biotechnol 99:319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Goldman RP, Travisano M (2011) Experimental evolution of ultraviolet radiation resistance in Escherichia coli. Evolution 65:3486–3498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Grace JM, Verseux C, Gentry D et al (2013) Elucidating microbial adaptation dynamics via autonomous exposure and sampling. In: AGU fall meeting abstracts, San Francisco, California, 9–13 Dec 2013, p 597Google Scholar
  50. Graham JM (2004) The biological terraforming of mars: planetary ecosynthesis as ecological succession on a global scale. Astrobiology 4:168–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Griffin M (2006) Science versus exploration: a false choice. Ad Astra 18:24Google Scholar
  52. Hallenbeck PC (2012) Microbial technologies in advanced biofuels production. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Harris DR, Pollock SV, Wood EA et al (2009) Directed evolution of ionizing radiation resistance in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 191:5240–5252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Harrison JP, Gheeraert N, Tsigelnitskiy D, Cockell CS (2013) The limits for life under multiple extremes. Trends Microbiol 21:204–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hempel F, Bozarth AS, Lindenkamp N et al (2011) Microalgae as bioreactors for bioplastic production. Microb Cell Fact 10:81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hendrickx L, De Wever H, Hermans V et al (2006) Microbial ecology of the closed artificial ecosystem MELiSSA (micro-ecological life support system alternative): reinventing and compartmentalizing the Earth’s food and oxygen regeneration system for long-haul space exploration missions. Res Microbiol 157:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hendrickx L, Mergeay M (2007) From the deep sea to the stars: human life support through minimal communities. Curr Opin Microbiol 10:231–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Henrikson R (2009) Earth food Spirulina: how this remarkable blue-green algae can transform your health and our planet, Revised edn. Ronore Enterprises Inc, Hana, Maui, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  59. Hepp A, Landis G, Kubiak C (1993) a chemical approach to carbon dioxide utilization on mars. In: Lewis JS, Matthews MS, Guerrieri ML (eds) Resources of near Earth space. The University of Arizona Press, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  60. Hoffman SJ, Kaplan DI (1997) Human exploration of mars: the reference mission of the NASA mars exploration study team. Publication, NASA Special 6107Google Scholar
  61. Horneck G, Facius R, Reichert M et al (2003) HUMEX, a study on the survivability and adaptation of humans to long-duration exploratory missions, part I: lunar missions. Adv Space Res 31:2389–2401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Horneck G, Facius R, Reichert M et al (2006) HUMEX, a study on the survivability and adaptation of humans to long-duration exploratory missions, part II: missions to mars. Adv Sp Res 38:752–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Horneck G (2008) The microbial case for mars and its implication for human expeditions to mars. Acta Astronaut 63:1015–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Jonkers HM, Thijssen A, Muyzer G et al (2010) Application of bacteria as self-healing agent for the development of sustainable concrete. Ecol Eng 36:230–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kanervo E, Lehto K, Ståhle K et al (2005) Characterization of growth and photosynthesis of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 cultures under reduced atmospheric pressures and enhanced CO2 levels. Int J Astrobiol 4:97–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Khalil AS, Collins JJ (2010) Synthetic biology: applications come of age. Nat Rev Genet 11:367–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kim M, Zhang Z, Okano H et al (2012) Need-based activation of ammonium uptake in Escherichia coli. Mol Syst Biol 8:616Google Scholar
  68. Kral TA, Altheide TS, Lueders AE, Schuerger AC (2011) Low pressure and desiccation effects on methanogens: implications for life on mars. Planet Space Sci 59:264–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kurahashi-Nakamura T, Tajika E (2006) Atmospheric collapse and transport of carbon dioxide into the subsurface on early Mars. Geophys Res Lett 33:L18205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Langhoff S, Cumbers J, Rothschild LJ et al (2011) What are the potential roles for synthetic biology in NASA’s mission? NASA/CP-2011-216430. NASA Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, California, 30–31 July 2010Google Scholar
  71. Lee SY (2012) Metabolic engineering and synthetic biology in strain development. ACS Synth Biol 1:491–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lehto K, Kanervo E, Stahle K, Lehto H (2007) Photosynthetic life support systems in the Martian conditions. In: Cockell C, Horneck G (eds) ROME: response of organisms to the martian environment (ESA AP-1299). ESA Communications, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, pp 151–160Google Scholar
  73. Lehto KM, Lehto HJ, Kanervo EA (2006) Suitability of different photosynthetic organisms for an extraterrestrial biological life support system. Res Microbiol 157:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lobascio C, Lamantea M, Cotronei V et al (2007) Plant bioregenerative life supports: the Italian CAB project. J Plant Interact 2:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Maggi F, Pallud C (2010) Space agriculture in micro- and hypo-gravity: a comparative study of soil hydraulics and biogeochemistry in a cropping unit on earth, mars, the moon and the space station. Planet Space Sci 58:1996–2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Marlière P, Patrouix J, Döring V et al (2011) Chemical evolution of a bacterium’s genome. Angew Chemie 50:7109–7114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Martin VJJ, Pitera DJ, Withers ST et al (2003) Engineering a mevalonate pathway in Escherichia coli for production of terpenoids. Nat Biotechnol 21:796–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Massa GD, Emmerich JC, Morrow RC et al (2007) Plant-growth lighting for space life support: a review. Gravitational Sp Biol 19:19–30Google Scholar
  79. Matheny JG (2007) Reducing the risk of human extinction. Risk Anal 27:1335–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. McKay CP, Davis WL (1989) Planetary protection issues in advance of human exploration of mars. Adv Space Res 9:197–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. McKay CP, Marinova M (2001) The physics, biology, and environmental ethics of making mars habitable. Astrobiology 1:89–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Menezes AA, Cumbers J, Hogan JA, Arkin AP (2014) Towards synthetic biological approaches to resource utilization on space missions. J R Soc Interface 12:20140715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ming DW, Archer PD, Glavin DP et al (2014) Volatile and organic compositions of sedimentary rocks in Yellowknife Bay, Gale crater. Mars. Science 343:1245267Google Scholar
  84. Möllers KB, Cannella D, Jørgensen H, Frigaard N-U (2014) Cyanobacterial biomass as carbohydrate and nutrient feedstock for bioethanol production by yeast fermentation. Biotechnol Biofuels 7:64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Montague M, McArthur GH, Cockell CS et al (2012) The role of synthetic biology for in situ resource utilization (ISRU). Astrobiology 12:1135–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Nelson M, Pechurkin NS, Allen JP et al (2010) Closed ecological systems, space life support and biospherics. In: Wang LK, Ivanov V, Tay J-H, Hung Y-T (eds) Environmental biotechnology. Humana Press, New York, pp 517–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Nicholson WL, Fajardo-Cavazos P, Fedenko J et al (2010) Exploring the low-pressure growth limit: evolution of Bacillus subtilis in the laboratory to enhanced growth at 5 kilopascals. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:7559–7565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Nicholson WL, Krivushin K, Gilichinsky D, Schuerger AC (2013) Growth of Carnobacterium spp. from permafrost under low pressure, temperature, and anoxic atmosphere has implications for earth microbes on mars. PNAS 110:666–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Niederholtmeyer H, Wolfstädter BT, Savage DF et al (2010) Engineering cyanobacteria to synthesize and export hydrophilic products. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:3462–3466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Olsson-Francis K, Cockell CS (2010a) Use of cyanobacteria for in-situ resource use in space applications. Planet Space Sci 58:1279–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Olsson-Francis K, Cockell CS (2010b) Experimental methods for studying microbial survival in extraterrestrial environments. J Microbiol Methods 80:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Osanai T, Oikawa A, Numata K et al (2014) Pathway-level acceleration of glycogen catabolism by a response regulator in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis species PCC 6803. Plant Physiol 164:1831–1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Patnaik R, Louie S, Gavrilovic V et al (2002) Genome shuffling of Lactobacillus for improved acid tolerance. Nat Biotechnol 20:707–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Pagliaro M, Rossi M (2010) The future of glycerol, 2nd edn. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  95. Peralta-Yahya PP, Zhang F, del Cardayre SB, Keasling JD (2012) Microbial engineering for the production of advanced biofuels. Nature 488:320–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Perani G (1997) Military technologies and commercial applications: public policies in NATO countries. Final report to the NATO Office for Information and Press, Centro Studi di Politica Internazionale, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  97. Poughon L, Farges B, Dussap CG et al (2009) Simulation of the MELiSSA closed loop system as a tool to define its integration strategy. Adv Sp Res 44:1392–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (2010) New directions: the ethics of synthetic biology and emerging technologies. Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  99. Quintana N, Van der Kooy F, Van de Rhee MD et al (2011) Renewable energy from cyanobacteria: energy production optimization by metabolic pathway engineering. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:471–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Race M, Denning K, Bertka CM et al (2012) Astrobiology and society: building an interdisciplinary research community. Astrobiology 12:958–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Radakovits R, Jinkerson RE, Darzins A, Posewitz MC (2010) Genetic engineering of algae for enhanced biofuel production. Eukaryot Cell 9:486–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Raksajit W, Satchasataporn K, Lehto K et al (2012) Enhancement of hydrogen production by the filamentous non-heterocystous cyanobacterium Arthrospira sp. PCC 8005. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37:18791–18797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Ro D-K, Paradise EM, Ouellet M et al (2006) Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast. Nature 440:940–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Rothschild LJ (1990) Earth analogs for Martian life. Microbes in evaporites, a new model system for life on Mars. Icarus 88:246–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rothschild LJ (2010) A powerful toolkit for synthetic biology: Over 3.8 billion years of evolution. BioEssays 32:304–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Ruder WC, Lu T, Collins JJ (2011) Synthetic biology moving into the clinic. Science 333:1248–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Schuerger AC, Ulrich R, Berry BJ, Nicholson WL (2013) Growth of Serratia liquefaciens under 7 mbar, 0 °C, and CO2-enriched anoxic atmospheres. Astrobiology 13:115–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Slade D, Radman M (2011) Oxidative stress resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 75:133–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Spiller H, Latorre C, Hassan ME, Shanmugam KT (1986) Isolation and characterization of nitrogenase-derepressed mutant strains of cyanobacterium Anabaena variabilis. J Bacteriol 165:412–419Google Scholar
  110. Subramanian G, Shanmugasundaram S (1986) Uninduced ammonia release by the nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium Anabaena. FEMS Microbiol Lett 37:151–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Thomas DJ, Boling J, Boston PJ et al (2006) Extremophiles for ecopoiesis: desirable traits for and survivability of pioneer Martian organisms. Gravitational Sp Biol 19:91–104Google Scholar
  112. Tikhomirov AA, Ushakova SA, Kovaleva NP et al (2007) Biological life support systems for a mars mission planetary base: problems and prospects. Adv Sp Res 40:1741–1745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Tokano T (2005) Water on Mars and life. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Toprak E, Veres A, Yildiz S, Pedraza J (2013) Building a morbidostat: an automated continuous-culture device for studying bacterial drug resistance under dynamically sustained drug inhibition. Nat Protoc 8:555–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Verseux C, Baqué M, Lehto K, de Vera J-PP, Rothschild LJ, Billi D (2015) Sustainable life support on mars—the potential roles of cyanobacteria. Int J Astrobiol. doi:  10.1017/S147355041500021X
  116. Wang HH, Isaacs FJ, Carr PA et al (2009) Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution. Nature 460:894–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Wassmann M, Moeller R, Reitz G, Rettberg P (2010) Adaptation of Bacillus subtilis cells to Archean-like UV climate: relevant hints of microbial evolution to remarkably increased radiation resistance. Astrobiology 10:605–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Way JC, Silver PA, Howard RJ (2011) Sun-driven microbial synthesis of chemicals in space. Int J Astrobiol 10:359–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Weber W, Fussenegger M (2011) Emerging biomedical applications of synthetic biology. Nat Rev Genet 13:21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Webster CR, Mahaffy PR, Atreya SK et al (2015) Mars methane detection and variability at Gale crater. Science 347:415–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Zhang F, Rodriguez S, Keasling JD (2011) Metabolic engineering of microbial pathways for advanced biofuels production. Curr Opin Biotechnol 22:775–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Zubrin R (1995) The economic viability of Mars colonization. J Br Interplanet Soc 48:407–414Google Scholar
  123. Zubrin R, Wagner R (1996) The case for mars: the plan to settle the Red Planet and why we must. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cyprien N. Verseux
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ivan G. Paulino-Lima
    • 3
  • Mickael Baqué
    • 1
  • Daniela Billi
    • 1
  • Lynn J. Rothschild
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity Tor VergataRomeItaly
  2. 2.NASA EAP AssociateNASA Ames Research CenterMoffett FieldUSA
  3. 3.NASA Ames Research CenterMoffett FieldUSA
  4. 4.NASA Ames Research Center, Earth Sciences DivisionMoffett FieldUSA

Personalised recommendations