Advertisement

Animation Guidelines for Believable Embodied Conversational Agent Gestures

  • Ivan Gris
  • Diego A. Rivera
  • David NovickEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9179)

Abstract

In animating embodied conversational agents (ECAs), run-time blending of animations can provide a large library of movements that increases the appearance of naturalness while decreasing the number of animations to be developed. This approach avoids the need to develop a costly full library of possible animations in advance of use. Our principal scientific contribution is the development of a model for gesture constraints that enables blended animations to represent naturalistic movement. Rather than creating over-detailed, fine-grained procedural animations or hundreds of motion-captured animation files, animators can include sets of their own animations for agents, blend them, and easily reuse animations, while constraining the ECA to use motions that would occur and transition naturally.

Keywords

Embodied conversational agents Animation Usability 

References

  1. Bates, J.: The role of emotion in believable agents. Commun. ACM 37(7), 122–125 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cassell, J., Vilhjálmsson, H.H., Bickmore, T.: BEAT: the behavior expression animation toolkit. In: Cassell, J., Högni, H., Bickmore, T. (eds.) Life-Like Characters, pp. 163–185. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Detenber, B.H., Reeves, B.: A bio-informational theory of emotion: Motion and image size effects on viewers. J. Communi. 46(3), 66–84 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gris, I., Novick, D., Camacho, A., Rivera, D.A., Gutierrez, M., Rayon, A.: Recorded speech, virtual environments, and the effectiveness of embodied conversational agents. In: Bickmore, T., Marsella, S., Sidner, C. (eds.) IVA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8637, pp. 182–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  5. Hostetter, A.B., Potthoff, A.L.: Effects of personality and social situation on representational gesture production. Gesture 12(1), 62–83 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lasseter, J.: Principles of traditional animation applied to 3D computer animation. ACM Siggraph Comput. Graphics 21(4), 35–44 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Loomis, J.M., Knapp, J.M.: Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. Virtual Adapt. Environ. 11, 21–46 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. Neff, M., Wang, Y., Abbott, R., Walker, M.: Evaluating the effect of gesture and language on personality perception in conversational agents. In: Safonova, A. (ed.) IVA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6356, pp. 222–235. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  9. Thomas, F., Johnston, O., Frank, T.: The Illusion of life: Disney Animation, pp. 306–312. Hyperion, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  10. Vilhjálmsson, H.H.: Augmenting online conversation through automated discourse tagging. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science System Sciences, HICSS 2005, pp. 109a-109a. IEEE, January 2005Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceThe University of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA

Personalised recommendations