Novel Method to Map the Morphology of Submarine Landslide Headwall Scarps Using Remotely Operated Vehicles

  • Veerle A. I. Huvenne
  • Aggeliki Georgiopoulou
  • Leo Chaumillon
  • Claudio Lo Iacono
  • Russell B. Wynn

Abstract

Submarine landslides are one of the main marine geohazards worldwide. In order to better estimate their risk and develop mitigation measures, a better understanding of the failure mechanisms is needed. However, observing landslides in real time is near to impossible, hence careful study of both the failed sequence and the deposit is still the main source of information. Until recently, studies of the headwall scarps of submarine landslides were mainly based on shipboard acoustics and the descriptions of analogues on land. The increasing availability of Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) now allows in-situ, close-up investigations in the marine environment. In this paper we present a novel methodology to obtain a detailed map of the headwall morphology of submarine landslides, including detail on vertical cliffs, overhanging strata and biological colonisation. Using a high-resolution multibeam system mounted on the front of a working-class ROV, rather than in a traditional downward looking configuration, we mapped three sections of a scallop-shaped headwall scarp which is part of the Rockall Bank Slide Complex, west of Ireland, as part of the SORBEH cruise funded by the Irish Government and the ERC CODEMAP project. The resulting 3D model provides insights in the build-up of the failed sequence, allowing advances in the understanding of rupture mechanisms. It can be combined with close-up video ground-truthing and carefully collected samples to create a complete picture of the headwall scarp.

References

  1. Elliot GM, Shannon PM, Haughton PDW, Øvrebø LK (2010) The Rockall Bank Mass Flow: collapse of a moated contourite drift onlapping the eastern flank of Rockall Bank, west of Ireland. Mar Pet Geol 27:92–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Georgiopoulou A, Shannon PM, Sacchetti F, Haughton PDW, Benetti S (2013) Basement-controlled multiple slope collapses, Rockall Bank Slide Complex, NE Atlantic. Mar Geol 336:198–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Glenn NF, Streutker DR, Chadwick DJ, Thackray GD, Dorsch SJ (2006) Analysis of LiDAR-derived topographic information for characterising and differentiating landslide morphology and activity. Geomorphology 73:131–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Heezen BC, Ewing M (1952) Turbidity currents and submarine slumps, and the 1929 Grand Banks earthquake. Am J Sci 250:849–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hogan KA, Dowdeswell JA, Mienert J (2013) New insights into the slide processes and seafloor geology revealed by side-scan imagery of the massive Hinlopen Slide, Arctic Ocean margin. Geo-Mar Lett 33:325–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hughes Clarke JE (2003) Dynamic motion residuals in swath sonar data: ironing out the creases. Int Hydrogr Rev 4:6–23Google Scholar
  7. Hühnerbach V, Masson DG, project potC (2004) Landslides in the North Atlantic and its adjacent seas: an analysis of their morphology, setting and behaviour. Mar Geol 213:343–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huvenne VAI, Tyler PA, Masson DG, Fisher EH, Hauton C, Hühnerbach V, Le Bas TP, Wolff GA (2011) A picture on the wall: innovative mapping reveals cold-water coral refuge in submarine canyon. PLoS One 6:e28755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Krastel S, Behrmann J-H, Völker D, Stipp M, Berndt C, Urgeles R, Chaytor J, Huhn K, Strasser M, Harbitz CB (2014) Submarine mass movements and their consequences. Springer, SwitzerlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lissak C, Maquaire O, Malet J-P, Bitri A, Samyn K, Grandjean G, Bourdean C, Reiffsteck P, Davidson R (2014) Airborne and ground-based data sources for characterizing the morpho-structure of a coastal landslide. Geomorphology 2017:140–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Masson DG, Wynn RB, Talling PJ (2010) Large landslides on passive continental margins: processes, hypotheses and outstanding questions. In: Mosher DC, Shipp RC, Moscardelli L, Chaytor JD, Baxter CDP, Lee HJ, Urgeles R (eds) Submarine mass movements and their consequences. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 153–165Google Scholar
  12. Micallef A, Masson DG, Berndt C, Stow DAV (2007) Morphology and mechanics of submarine spreading: a case study from the Storegga Slide. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 112:F03023Google Scholar
  13. Micallef A, Berndt C, Masson DG, Stow DAV (2008) Scale invariant characteristics of the Storegga Slide and implications for large-scale submarine mass movements. Mar Geol 247:46–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Øvrebø LK, Haughton PDW, Shannon PM (2005) Temporal and spatial variations in late quaternary slope sedimentation along the undersupplied margins of the Rockall Trough, offshore west Ireland. Nor J Geol 85:279–294Google Scholar
  15. Shannon PM (1991) The development of Irish offshore sedimentary basins. J Geol Soc Lond 148:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stoker MS, Praeg D, Hjelstuen BO, Laberg JS, Nielsen T, Shannon PM (2005) Neogene stratigraphy and the sedimentary and oceanographic development of the NW European Atlantic margin. Mar Pet Geol 22:977–1005. doi:10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2004.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wilson MFJ, O’Connell B, Brown C, Guinan JC, Grehan AJ (2007) Multiscale terrain analysis of multibeam bathymetry data for habitat mapping on the continental slope. Mar Geod 30:3–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wynn RB, Huvenne VAI, Le Bas TP, Murton BJ, Connelly DP, Bett BJ, Ruhl HA, Morris KJ, Peakall J, Parsons DR, Sumner EJ, Darby SE, Dorrell RM, Hunt JE (2014) Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs): their past, presence and future contributions to the advancement of marine geoscience. Mar Geol 352:451–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Veerle A. I. Huvenne
    • 1
  • Aggeliki Georgiopoulou
    • 2
    • 3
  • Leo Chaumillon
    • 1
    • 4
  • Claudio Lo Iacono
    • 1
  • Russell B. Wynn
    • 1
  1. 1.Marine Geoscience, National Oceanography CentreUniversity of Southampton Waterfront CampusSouthamptonUK
  2. 2.UCD School of Geological SciencesUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
  3. 3.UCD Earth InstituteUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
  4. 4.INTECHMERCherbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations