Skip to main content

Dipyridamole Stress Echocardiography

  • Chapter
Stress Echocardiography

Abstract

Dipyridamole was the first pharmacological stress agent used for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, with a pioneering indicator proposed in Europe for the identification of ischemia during stress echocardiography [1] and later in the USA by Lance Gould as hyperemic stress perfusion imaging [2]. Its main cardiac imaging applications stem from two fundamental properties, which are the two imaging sides of the same pathophysiological coin of coronary arteriolar vasodilation: the hyperemic effect and the proischemic effect [3]. The hyperemic effect is the conceptual basis for myocardial perfusion imaging, usually with radionuclide scintigraphy but today also with cardiovascular magnetic resonance [4]. The ischemic effect is the requisite for functional imaging, usually with two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography (Fig. 13.1), but today also performed with magnetic resonance [5].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tauchert M, Behrenbeck DW, Hotzel J et al (1976) A new pharmacological test for diagnosing coronary artery disease. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 101:35–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gould KL, Westcott RJ, Albro PC et al (1978) Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. II. Clinical methodology and feasibility. Am J Cardiol 41:279–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Picano E (1989) Dipyridamole-echocardiography test: historical background and physiologic basis. Eur Heart J 10:365–376

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bodi V, Sanchis J, Lopez-Lereu MP et al (2007) Prognostic value of dipyridamole stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1174–1179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pingitore A, Lombardi M, Scattini B et al (2008) Head to head comparison between perfusion and function during accelerated high-dose dipyridamole magnetic resonance stress for the detection of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 101:8–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Picano E, Distante A, Masini M et al (1985) Dipyridamole-echocardiography test in effort angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 56:452–456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Picano E, Lattanzi F, Masini M et al (1986) High dose dipyridamole echocardiography test in effort angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 8:848–854

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Picano E, Pingitore A, Conti U et al (1993) Enhanced sensitivity for detection of coronary artery disease by addition of atropine to dipyridamole echocardiography. Eur Heart J 14:1216–1222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dal Porto R, Faletra F, Picano E et al (2001) Safety, feasibility, and diagnostic accuracy of accelerated high-dose dipyridamole stress echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 87:520–524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowenstein J, Tiano C, Márquez G et al (1998) Accelerated high dose dipyridamole stress echo, the busy cardiologist’s stress test. Eur Heart J 19:3440, (abstract).Supplement

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lowenstein J, Tiano C, Marquez G, Presti C (2000) Sensitivity increase of dipyridamole echo-stress with the simultaneous determination of contractility and coronary flow reserve of the anterior descending coronary artery by transthoracic doppler echocardiography. Rev Argent Cardiol 68:683–696

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lipiec P, Wejner-Mik P, Krzemińska-Pakula M et al (2009) Detection of single-vessel coronary artery disease by dipyridamole stress echocardiography: no longer a problem? Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 29:151–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moir S, Haluska BA, Jenkins C et al (2004) Incremental benefit of myocardial contrast to combined dipyridamole-exercise stress echocardiography for the assessment of coronary artery disease. Circulation 110:1108–1113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rigo F, Richieri M, Pasanisi E et al (2003) Usefulness of coronary flow reserve over regional wall motion when added to dual-imaging dipyridamole echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 91:269–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sicari R, Nihoyannopoulos P, Evangelista A et al; European Association of Echocardiography (2008) Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). Eur J Echocardiograph 9:415–437

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rigo F (2005) Coronary flow reserve in stress-echo lab. From pathophysiologic toy to diagnostic tool. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 3:8

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Laghi-Pasini F, Guideri F, Petersen C et al (2003) Blunted increase in plasma adenosine levels following dipyridamole stress in dilated cardiomyopathy patients. J Intern Med 254:591–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gliozheni E, Picano E, Bernardino L et al (1996) Angiographically assessed coronary collateral circulation increases vulnerability to myocardial ischemia during vasodilator stress testing. Am J Cardiol 78:1419–1424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hutchinson SJ, Shen A, Soldo S et al (1996) Transesophageal assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve during “regular” and “high”-dose dipyridamole stress testing. Am J Cardiol 77:1164–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Torres MA, Picano E, Parodi G et al (1997) Flow-function relation in patients with chronic coronary artery disease and reduced regional function. A positron emission tomographic and two-dimensional echocardiographic study with coronary vasodilator stress. J Am Coll Cardiol 30:65–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Varga A, Ostojic M, Djordjevic-Dikic A et al (1996) Infra-low dose dipyridamole test. A novel dose regimen for selective assessment of myocardial viability by vasodilator stress echocardiography. Eur Heart J 17:629–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Picano E (2002) Dipyridamole in myocardial ischemia: good Samaritan or terminator? Int J Cardiol 83:215–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Armstrong WF, Pellikka PA, Ryan T et al (1998) Stress echocardiography: recommendations for performance and interpretation of stress echocardiography. Stress Echocardiography Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 11:97–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pellikka PA, Nagueh SF, Elhendy AA et al; American Society of Echocardiography (2007) American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20:1021–1041

    Google Scholar 

  25. Picano E, Ostojic M, Varga A et al (1996) Combined low-dose dipyridamole-dobutamine stress echocardiography to identify myocardial viability. J Am Coll Cardiol 27:1422–1428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Picano E, Lattanzi F, Masini M et al (1988) Usefulness of the dipyridamole-exercise echocardiography test for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 62:67–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ostojic M, Picano E, Beleslin B et al (1994) Dipyridamole-dobutamine echocardiography: a novel test for the detection of milder forms of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 23:1115–1122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Picano E, Marini C, Pirelli S et al (1992) Safety of intravenous high-dose dipyridamole echocardiography. The Echo-Persantine International Cooperative Study Group. Am J Cardiol 70:252–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Picano E, Lattanzi F, Distante A et al (1989) Role of myocardial oxygen consumption in dipyridamole-induced ischemia. Am Heart J 118:314–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Picano E, Lattanzi F, Masini M et al (1988) Aminophylline termination of dipyridamole stress as a trigger of coronary vasospasm in variant angina. Am J Cardiol 62:694–697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Varga A, Garcia MA, Picano E, International Stress Echo Complication Registry (2006) Safety of stress echocardiography (from the International Stress Echo Complication Registry). Am J Cardiol 98:541–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Beckmann S, Haug G (1999) National registry 1995–1998 on 150.000 stress echo examinations side effects and complications in 60,448 examinations of the registry 1997–1998. Circulation 100(Suppl):3401A

    Google Scholar 

  33. Picano E, Mathias W Jr, Pingitore A, Bigi R, Previtali M (1994) Safety and tolerability of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography: a prospective, multicentre study. Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative Study Group. Lancet 344:1190–1192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG (2007) Stress echocardiography, stress single-photon-emission computed tomography and electron beam computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. Am Heart J 154:415–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Salustri A, Fioretti PM, McNeill AJ et al (1992) Pharmacological stress echocardiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease and myocardial ischaemia: a comparison between dobutamine and dipyridamole. Eur Heart J 13:1356–1362

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pingitore A, Picano E, QuartaColosso M et al (1996) The atropine factor in pharmacologic stress echocardiography. Echo Persantine (EPIC) and Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative (EDIC) Study Groups. J Am Coll Cardiol 27:1164–1170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. San Román JA, Vilacosta I, Castillo JA et al (1998) Selection of the optimal stress test for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Heart 80:370–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Loimaala A, Groundstroem K, Pasanen M et al (1999) Comparison of bicycle, heavy isometric, dipyridamole-atropine and dobutamine stress echocardiography for diagnosis of myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 84:1396–1400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nedeljkovic I, Ostojic M, Beleslin B et al (2006) Comparison of exercise, dobutamine-atropine and dipyridamole-atropine stress echocardiography in detecting coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 4:22

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Picano E, Molinaro S, Pasanisi E (2008) The diagnostic accuracy of pharmacological stress echocardiography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 6:30

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sicari R, Ripoli A, Picano E et al; VIDA (Viability Identification with Dipyridamole Administration) Study Group (2001) The prognostic value of myocardial viability recognized by low dose dipyridamole echocardiography in patients with chronic ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction. Eur Heart J 22:837–844

    Google Scholar 

  42. Picano E, Severi S, Michelassi C et al (1989) Prognostic importance of dipyridamole echocardiography test in coronary artery disease. Circulation 80:450–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Severi S, Picano E, Michelassi C et al (1994) Diagnostic and prognostic value of dipyridamole echocardiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Comparison with exercise electrocardiography. Circulation 89:1160–1173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Coletta C, Galati A, Greco G et al (1995) Prognostic value of high-dose dipyridamole echocardiography in patients with chronic coronary artery disease and preserved left ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol 26:887–894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sicari R, Pasanisi E, Venneri L et al; on behalf of the Echo-Persantine International Cooperative (EPIC) and Echo-Dobutamine International Cooperative (EDIC) Study Groups (2003) Stress echo results predict mortality: a large-scale multicenter prospective international study. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:589–595

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bolognese L, Rossi L, Sarasso G et al (1992) Silent versus symptomatic dipyridamole induced ischemia after myocardial infarction: clinical and prognostic significance. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:953–959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sclavo MG, Noussan P, Pallisco O et al (1992) Usefulness of dipyridamole-echocardiographic test to identify jeopardized myocardium after thrombolysis. Limited clinical predictivity of dipyridamole-echocardiographic test in convalescing acute myocardial infarction: correlation with coronary angiography. Eur Heart J 13:1348–1355

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Picano E, Landi P, Bolognese L et al (1993) Prognostic value of dipyridamole echocardiography early after uncomplicated myocardial infarction: a large-scale, multicenter trial. The EPIC Study Group. Am J Med 95:608–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Chiarella F, Domenicucci S, Bellotti P et al (1994) Dipyridamole echocardiographic test performed 3 days after an acute myocardial infarction: feasibility, tolerability, safety and inhospital prognostic value. Eur Heart J 15:842–850

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Van Daele ME, McNeill AJ, Fioretti PM et al (1994) Prognostic value of dipyridamole sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography and dipyridamole stress echocardiography for new cardiac events after an uncomplicated myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 7:370–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Neskovic AN, Popovic AD, Babic R et al (1995) Positive high-dose dipyridamole echocardiography test after acute myocardial infarction is an excellent predictor of cardiac events. Am Heart J 129:31–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sicari R, Landi P, Picano E et al; EPIC (Echo Persantine International Cooperative); EDIC (Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative) Study Group (2002) Exercise-electrocardiography and/or pharmacological stress echocardiography for non-invasive risk stratification early after uncomplicated myocardial infarction. A prospective international large scale multicentre study. Eur Heart J 23:1030–1037

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tischler MD, Lee TH, Hirsch AT et al (1991) Prediction of major cardiac events after peripheral vascular surgery using dipyridamole echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 68:593–597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sicari R, Picano E, Lusa AM et al (1995) The value of dipyridamole echocardiography in risk stratification before vascular surgery. A multicenter study. The EPIC (Echo Persantine International Study) Group-Subproject: risk stratification before major vascular surgery. Eur Heart J 16:842–847

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rossi E, Citterio F, Vescio MF et al (1998) Risk stratification of patients undergoing peripheral vascular revascularization by combined resting and dipyridamole echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 82:306–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pasquet A, D’Hondt AM, Verhelst R et al (1998) Comparison of dipyridamole stress echocardiography and perfusion scintigraphy for cardiac risk stratification in vascular surgery patients. Am J Cardiol 82:1468–1470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Sicari R, Ripoli A, Picano E et al; on behalf of the EPIC study group (1999) Perioperative prognostic value of dipyridamole echocardiography in vascular surgery: a large-scale multicenter study on 509 patients. Circulation 100(19 Suppl):II269–II274

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zamorano J, Duque A, Baquero M et al (2002) Stress echocardiography in the pre-operative evaluation of patients undergoing major vascular surgery. Are results comparable with dipyridamole versus dobutamine stress echo? Rev Esp Cardiol 55:121–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Cortigiani L, Paolini EA, Nannini E (1998) Dipyridamole stress echocardiography for risk stratification in hypertensive patients with chest pain. Circulation 98:2855–2859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Mondillo S, Agricola E, Ammaturo T et al (2001) Prognostic value of dipyridamole stress echocardiography in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, chest pain and resting ECG repolarization abnormalities. Can J Cardiol 17:571–577

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Camerieri A, Picano E, Landi P et al (1993) Prognostic value of dipyridamole echocardiography early after myocardial infarction in elderly patients. Echo Persantine Italian Cooperative (EPIC) Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:1809–1815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Cortigiani L, Dodi C, Paolini EA et al (1998) Prognostic value of pharmacological stress echocardiography in women with chest pain and unknown coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:1975–1981

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Cortigiani L, Picano E, Vigna C et al; on behalf of the EPIC and EDIC study groups (2001) Prognostic value of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in patients with left bundle branch block. Am J Med 110:361–369

    Google Scholar 

  64. Cortigiani L, Bigi R, Gigli G et al (2003) Prognostic significance of intraventricular conduction defects in patients undergoing stress echocardiography for suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Med 15:126–132

    Google Scholar 

  65. Cortigiani L, Picano E, Coletta C et al; on behalf of the EPIC (Echo Persantine International Cooperative) and EDIC (Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative) Study Groups (2002) Safety, feasibility and prognostic implication of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in 1482 patients evaluated in an ambulatory setting. Am Heart J 141:621–629

    Google Scholar 

  66. Cortigiani L, Picano E, Landi P et al (1998) Value of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in risk stratification of patients with single-vessel disease: a report from the Echo-Persantine and Echo-Dobutamine International Cooperative Studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:69–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Orlandini A, Tuero E, Paolasso E et al (2000) Usefulness of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in a chest pain center. Am J Cardiol 86(1247–1250):A6

    Google Scholar 

  68. Bedetti G, Pasanisi EM, Tintori G et al (2005) Stress echo in chest pain unit: the SPEED trial. Int J Cardiol 102:461–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Lattanzi F, Picano E, Bolognese L et al (1991) Inhibition of dipyridamole-induced ischemia by antianginal therapy in humans. Correlation with exercise electrocardiography. Circulation 83:1256–1262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Sicari R, Cortigiani L, Bigi R et al; Echo-Persantine International Cooperative (EPIC) Study Group; Echo-Dobutamine International Cooperative (EDIC) Study Group (2004) Prognostic value of pharmacological stress echocardiography is affected by concomitant antiischemic therapy at the time of testing. Circulation 109:2428–2431

    Google Scholar 

  71. Schröder K, Wieckhorst A, Völler H (1997) Comparison of the prognostic value of dipyridamole and dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 79:1516–1518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Minardi G, Di Segni M, Manzara CC et al (1997) Diagnostic and prognostic value of dipyridamole and dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with Q-wave acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 80:847–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Pingitore A, Picano E, Varga A et al (1999) Prognostic value of pharmacological stress echocardiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a prospective, large-scale, multicenter, head-to-head comparison between dipyridamole and dobutamine test. Echo-Persantine International Cooperative (EPIC) and Echo-Dobutamine International Cooperative (EDIC) Study Groups. J Am Coll Cardiol 34:1769–1777

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Nohtomi Y, Takeuchi M, Nagasawa K et al (2003) Simultaneous assessment of wall motion and coronary flow velocity in the left anterior descending coronary artery during dipyridamole stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:457–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Lowenstein J, Tiano C, Marquez G et al (2003) Simultaneous analysis of wall motion and coronary flow reserve of the left anterior descending coronary artery by transthoracic doppler echocardiography during dipyridamole stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:607–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Chirillo F, Bruni A, De Leo A et al (2004) Usefulness of dipyridamole stress echocardiography for predicting graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 93:24–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Ascione L, De Michele M, Accadia M et al (2006) Incremental diagnostic value of ultrasonographic assessment of coronary flow reserve with high-dose dipyridamole in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Int J Cardiol 106:313–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Picano E, Pálinkás A, Amyot R (2001) Diagnosis of myocardial ischemia in hypertensive patients. J Hypertens 19:1177–1183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Rigo F, Cortigiani L, Pasanisi E et al (2006) The additional prognostic value of coronary flow reserve on left anterior descending artery in patients with negative stress echo by wall motion criteria. A Transthoracic Vasodilator Stress Echocardiography Study. Am Heart J 151:124–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Cortigiani L, Rigo F, Sicari R et al (2012) Coronary flow reserve during dipyridamole stress echocardiography predicts mortality. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5:1079–1081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Sicari R, Rigo F, Gherardi S et al (2008) The prognostic value of doppler echocardiographic derived coronary flow reserve is not affected by concomitant anti-ischemic therapy at the time of testing. Am Heart J 156:573–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Sicari R, Rigo F, Gherardi S et al (2009) Long-term survival of patients with chest pain syndrome and angiographically normal or near normal coronary arteries: the additional prognostic value of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 103:626–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Cortigiani L, Rigo F, Gherardi S et al (2007) Additional prognostic value of coronary flow reserve in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with negative dipyridamole stress echocardiography by wall motion criteria. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1354–1361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Lowenstein JA, Caniggia C, Rousse G et al (2014) Coronary flow velocity reserve during pharmacologic stress echocardiography with normal contractility adds important prognostic value in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 27:1113–1119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Cortigiani L, Rigo F, Galderisi M et al (2011) Diagnostic and prognostic value of Doppler echocardiography coronary flow reserve on left anterior descending coronary artery in hypertensive and normotensive patients. Heart 5:1086–1087

    Google Scholar 

  86. Cortigiani L, Rigo F, Gherardi S et al (2013) Prognostic implication of Doppler echocardiographic derived coronary flow reserve in patients with left bundle branch block. Eur Heart J 34:364–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Rigo F, Gherardi S, Galderisi M et al (2006) The prognostic impact of coronary flow-reserve assessed by Doppler echocardiography in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J 27:1319–1323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Cortigiani L, Rigo F, Gherardi S et al (2008) Prognostic implications of coronary flow reserve on left anterior descending coronary artery in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 102:1634–1646

    Google Scholar 

  89. Gaibazzi N, Reverberi C, Lorenzoni V et al (2012) Prognostic value of high-dose myocardial contrast perfusion echocardiography. Circulation 129:429–437

    Google Scholar 

  90. Lima MF, Mathias W Jr, Sbano JC et al (2013) Prognostic value of coronary and microvascular flow reserve in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 26:278–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Picano E (2010) The dawn of third-generation stress echocardiography? Editorial. Rev Argent Cardiol 78:507–510

    Google Scholar 

  92. Lowenstein J, Darú V, Amor M et al (2010) Análisis simultáneo del strain 2D, de la reserva coronaria y de la contractilidad parietal durante el eco estrés con dipiridamol. Resultados comparativos. Rev Argent Cardiol 78:499–506

    Google Scholar 

  93. Beleslin BD, Ostojic M, Stepanovic J et al (1994) Stress echocardiography in the detection of myocardial ischemia. Head-to-head comparison of exercise, dobutamine, and dipyridamole tests. Circulation 90:1168–1176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Sochowski RA, Yvorchuk KJ, Yang Y et al (1995) Dobutamine and dipyridamole stress echocardiography in patients with a low incidence of severe coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 8:482–487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Martin TW, Seaworth JF, Johns JP et al (1992) Comparison of adenosine, dipyridamole, and dobutamine in stress echocardiography. Ann Intern Med 116:190–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S et al (2013) 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 34:2949–3003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Wolk MJ, Bailey SR, Doherty JU et al; American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force (2014) ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:380–406

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Table of Contents Video Companion

Table of Contents Video Companion

  • See stress echo primer, cases 1 to 8.

  • See also, in the section illustrative cases, cases number 1 to 8 (by Maria Joao Andrade, MD, Carnaxide, Lisbon, Portugal) and cases 13 to 18 (by Jorge Lowenstein, MD, Buenos Aires, Argentina, and Quirino Ciampi, MD, PhD, Benevento, Italy).

  • See also in the section “Selected presentations: Angels in the stress echo lab.”

  • Springer Extra Materials available at http://extras.springer.com/2015/978-3-319-20957-9

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lowenstein, J., Picano, E. (2015). Dipyridamole Stress Echocardiography. In: Stress Echocardiography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20958-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20958-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20957-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20958-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics