Advertisement

Designing a Vibrotactile Language for a Wearable Vest

  • Ann MorrisonEmail author
  • Hendrik Knoche
  • Cristina Manresa-Yee
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9187)

Abstract

We designed a wearable vest that houses a set of actuators to be placed at specific points on the body. We developed vibrotactile patterns to induce five sensation types: (1) Calming, (2 patterns, Up and Down back) (2) Feel Good (4 patterns in different directions around the waist), (3) Activating (2 patterns, Tarzan and Shiver, on top front of body and then down the back as well for Shiver), (4) Navigation (2 patterns, Turn Left and Turn Right, prompting on back then opposite side front waist) for full body turning and (5) Warning, (1 pattern on solar plexus) to slow down or stop the wearers. We made an overlap between the pulses, which were of longer durations than the short burst saltation pulses designed to induce muscle movement. Our participants responded well to the Calming and Feel Good patterns, but reported mixed responses to Activation, Navigation and Warning patterns.

Keywords

Wearable technology Vibrotactile patterns Calming effects 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the volunteers for the field trials, our Kinesiologist Bettina Eriksen and Aalborg Kommune for support. This work is supported by the EU funded project CultAR (FP7-ICT-2011-9 601139).

References

  1. 1.
    Ghiani, G., Leporini, B., Paternò, F.: Vibrotactile feedback to aid blind users of mobile guides. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 20, 305–317 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bahram, S., Chakraborty, A., Ravindran, S., Amant, R.S.: Intelligent Interaction in Accessible Applications. A Multimodal End-2-End Approach to Accessible Computing, pp. 93–117. Springer, London (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosenthal, J., Edwards, N., Villanueva, D., Krishna, S., McDaniel, T., Panchanathan, S.: Design, implementation, and case study of a pragmatic vibrotactile belt. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 60, 114–125 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nanayakkara, S., Taylor, E., Wyse, L., Ong, S.H.: An enhanced musical experience for the deaf: design and evaluation of a music display and a haptic chair. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2009, pp. 337–346. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yao, L., Shi, Y., Chi, H., Ji, X., Ying, F.: Music-touch shoes: vibrotactile interface for hearing impaired dancers. In: Proceedings of the TEI 2010, pp. 275–276. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spelmezan, D.: A language of tactile motion instructions. Ph.D. thesis (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nummenmaa, L., Glerean, E., Hari, R., Hietanen, J.K.: Bodily maps of emotions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 646–651 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arafsha, F., Alam, K.M., El Saddik, A.: EmoJacket: Consumer centric wearable affective jacket to enhance emotional immersion. In: Proceedings of the IIT 2012, pp. 350–355 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gemperle, F., Hirsch, T., Goode, A., Pearce, J., Siewiorek, D., Smailigic, A.: Wearable Vibro-tactile Display. Carnegie Mellon University, CMU Wearable Group (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karuei, I., MacLean, K.E., Foley-Fisher, Z., MacKenzie, R., Koch, S., El-Zohairy, M.: Detecting vibrations across the body in mobile contexts. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2011, pp. 3267–3276. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morrison, A., Knudsen, L., Andersen, H.J.: Urban vibrations: Sensitivities in the field with a broad demographic. In: Proceedings of the ISWC 2012, pp. 76–79. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Geldard, F.A., Sherrick, C.E.: The cutaneous“ rabbit”: a perceptual illusion. Science 178, 178–179 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McDaniel, T., Villanueva, D., Krishna, S., Panchanathan, S.: MOVeMENT: A framework for systematically mapping vibrotactile stimulations to fundamental body movements. In: Proceedings of the HAVE 2010, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spelmezan, D., Jacobs, M., Hilgers, A., Borchers, J.: Tactile motion instructions for physical activities. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2009, pp. 2243–2252. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Manresa-Yee, C., Morrison, A., Larsen, J.V., Varona, J.: A vibrotactile interface to motivate movement for children with severe to profound disabilities. In: INTERACCION 2014. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vorderer, P., Wirth, W., Gouveia, F.R., Biocca, F., Saari, T., Jäncke, F., Böcking, S., Schramm, H., Gysbers, A., Hartmann, T., others: MEC spatial presence questionnaire (MEC-SPQ): Short documentation and instructions for application. Rep. Eur. Community Proj. Presence MEC IST-2001-37661. 3 (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jackson, S.A., Marsh, H.W.: Others: Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 18, 17–35 (1996)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: The“ what” and“ why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 11, 227–268 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Obrist, M., Seah, S.A., Subramanian, S.: Talking about tactile experiences. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2013, pp. 1659–1668. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moussette, C.: Simple haptics: Sketching perspectives for the design of haptic interactions (2012). http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:558987

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann Morrison
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hendrik Knoche
    • 1
  • Cristina Manresa-Yee
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Architecture, Design and Media TechnologyAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceUniversity of Balearic IslandsPalmaSpain

Personalised recommendations