Hidden Presence: Sensing Occupancy and Extracting Value from Occupancy Data

  • Larissa Suzuki
  • Peter Cooper
  • Theo Tryfonas
  • George Oikonomou
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9188)

Abstract

In this paper we review various technical architectures for sensing occupancy in commercial real estate spaces and discuss the potential benefits of applications that could be built upon the collected data. The technical capabilities reviewed range from simple presence detection to identifying individual workers and relating those semantically to jobs, teams, processes or other elements of the business. The volume and richness of accumulated data varies accordingly allowing the development of a range of occupancy monitoring applications that could bring multiple benefits to an organization. We find that overall occupancy-based applications are underappreciated in the Smart Buildings mantra due to occupancy’s inability to align to traditional building engineering silos, a lack of common view between stakeholders with respect to what is ‘value’ and the current client assessment tendencies which use predominantly demonstrator-based logic rather than a combination of practical demonstrators and theoretical value. We demonstrate that in commercial office buildings, occupancy-based Smart Building concepts have the potential to deliver benefits that can be orders of magnitude greater than current practice associated with silos such as energy and lighting. The directness of value in these is far more variable however, and the barriers and enablers to its realization are non-trivial. We identify and discuss these factors (including privacy, perceived additional capital expenditure, retrofitting requirements etc.) in more detail and relate them to stages of design and delivery of the built environment. We conclude that, on the presumption costs of development and implementation are relatively similar, the value streams of occupancy-based systems, while requiring more careful and bespoke design in the short term, could produce greater lifetime value in commercial office scenarios than leading smart building technologies.

Keywords

Smart built environments Occupancy detection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by Arup Group Ltd. through the Industrial Doctoral Centre in Systems at the University of Bristol.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    United Nations, World Population Prospects: The 2010 revision. extended dataset on CD-ROM, ST/ESA/SER.A/308, Sales No. 11.XIII.7. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, NY (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bose, R.K. (ed.): Energy Efficient Cities: Assessment Tools and Benchmarking Practices, World Bank, Washington, D.C. (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    DOE. Buildings Energy Data Book, Department of Energy, March 2009. http://buildingsdatabook.eren.doe.gov/
  5. 5.
    Sinopoli, J.: Smart buildings: a handbook for the design and operation of building technology systems, (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Erickson, V.L., Lin, Y., Kamthe, A. Brahme, R., Surana, A., Cerpa, A., Sohn, E.M.D., Narayanan, S.: Energy efficient building environment control strategies using real-time occupancy measurements. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings, pp. 19–24 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Estrin, D., Girod, L., Pottie, G., Srivastava, M.: Instrumenting the world with wireless sensor networks. In: International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 2033–2036 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gao, G., Whitehouse, K.: The self-programming thermostat: optimizing setback schedules based on home occupancy patterns. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings, pp. 67–72 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Delaney, D.T., O’Hare, G.M.P., Ruzzelli, A.G.: Evaluation of energy-efficiency in lighting systems using sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings, pp. 61–66 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Agarwal, Y., Hodges, S., Chandra, R., Scott, J., Bahl, P., Gupta, R.: Somniloquy: augmenting network interfaces to reduce PC energy usage. In: Proceedings of USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI) (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Agarwal, Y., Savage, S., Gupta, R.: Sleep server: a software-only approach for reducing the energy consumption of PCS within enterprise environments. In: Proceedings of USENIX Annual Technical Symposium (USENIX ATC) (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lo, L.J., Novoselac, A.: Localized air-conditioning with occupancy control in an open office. Energy Build. 42, 1120–1128 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhu, Y., Liu, M.et al.: Optimization of Control Strategies for HVAC Terminal Boxes. In: Proceedings of 12th Symposium on Improving Building Systems in Hot and Humid Climates (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Padmanabh, K., Malikarjuna, A., Sen, V.S., Katru, S.P., Kumar, A., Vuppala, S.P.C.S.K., Paul, S.: iSense: a wireless sensor network based conference room management system. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings, pp. 37–42 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abushakra, B., Claridge, D.: Accounting for the occupancy variable in inverse building energy baselining models. In: ICBEO. Energy Systems Laboratory (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Agarwal, Y., Balaji, B., Gupta, R., Lyles, J., Wei, M., Weng, T.: Occupancy-driven energy management for smart building automation. In: BuildSys (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dodier, R.H., Henze, G.P., Tiller, D.K., Guo, X.: Building occupancy detection through sensor belief networks. Energy & Buildings (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marchiori, A., Han, Q.: Distributed wireless control for building energy management. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Building, BuildSys 2010, pp. 37–42. ACM, NY (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nguyen, T. A., Aiello, M.: Beyond Indoor Presence Monitoring with Simple Sensors. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Pervasive and Embedded Computing and Communication Systems (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hagras, H., Callaghan, V., Colley, M., Clarke, G., Pounds-Cornish, A., Duman, H.: Creating an ambient-intelligence environment using embedded agents, IEEE Intell. Syst. 19(6), 12–20 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Singhvi, V., Krause, A., Guestrin, C., Garrett Jr., J.H., Matthews, H.S.: Intelligent light control using sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, SenSys, pp. 218–229. ACM, NY (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen, H., Chou, P., Duri, S., Lei, H., Reason, J.: The design and implementation of a smart building control system In: IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering, ICEBE. pp. 255–262 (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Erickson, V.L., Lin, Y., Kamthe, A., Rohini, B., Surana, A., Cerpa, A.E., Sohn, M.D., Narayanan, S.: Energy Efficient building environment control strategies using realtime occupancy measurements. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings, BuildSys 2009, pp. 19–24. ACM, NY (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barbato, A., Borsani, L., Capone, A., Melzi, S.: Home energy saving through a user profiling system based on wireless sensors. In: Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 49–54 (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tarzia, S. P., Dick, R. P., Dinda, P.A., Memik. G.: Sonar-based measurement of user presence and attention. In: UbiComp, pp. 89–92 (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang, S., Jin, X.: Co 2-based occupancy detection for on-line outdoor air flow control. Indoor Built Environ. 7(3), 165–181 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Calì, D., Matthes, P., Huchtemann, K., Streblow, R., Müller, D.: CO2 based occupancy detection algorithm: experimental analysis and validation for office and residential buildings. Build. Environ. 86, 39–49 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mozer, M.: The Neural Network House: An Environment that Adapts to its Inhabitants. In Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (1998)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Snoonian, D.: Smart buildings. IEEE Spectr. 40(8), 18–23 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hughes, W. P., Ancell, D., Gruneberg, S. Hirst, L.: Exposing the myth of the 1:5:200 ratio relating initial cost, maintenance and staffing costs of office buildings. In: ARCOM Conference, p. 12 (2004)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    WRAP. Green Office: A guide to running a more cost-effective and environmentally sustainable office (2014)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Department of Business, UK Government: Analysis on UK Wages, 14 February (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Larissa Suzuki
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peter Cooper
    • 2
    • 3
  • Theo Tryfonas
    • 3
  • George Oikonomou
    • 3
  1. 1.University College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.ArupLondonUK
  3. 3.University of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations