Why People with FASD Fall for Manipulative Ploys: Ethical Limits of Interrogators’ Use of Lies

Chapter
Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 63)

Abstract

People with FASD are easily manipulated by others, and such social vulnerability is a major reason why they are so likely to get into serious legal and other forms of difficulty. Police interrogations are also manipulative, in that a detective is attempting to use various ploys—including deceptive statements–to persuade someone to do something he is initially reluctant to do, namely admit to having committed a criminal act. In this paper, the authors use an audiotape of an actual interrogation of a young man with FASD who initially strongly denied guilt, to better understand the way interrogative manipulations (including lies) were used to break his will and get him to confess to a crime which he may or may not have committed.

References

  1. Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R.F. 2001. Ego depletion, the executive function, and self-control: An energy model of the self in personality. In Personality psychology in the workplace, ed. B.R. Roberts, and R. Hogan, 299–316. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R.F., and J. Tierney. 2011. Willpower: Rediscovering the greatest human strength. New York: Penguin group.Google Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R.F., E. Bratlavsky, M. Muraven, and D.M. Tice. 1998. Ego depletion: is the self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(5): 1252–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, N.N. and P. Connor. 2014. Impact of executive dysfunction on learning in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). Seattle, Washington: Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, N.N., Gudjonsson, G., and Connor, P. 2011. Suggestibility and fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD): I’ll tell you anything you want to hear. Journal of Psychiatry and Law 39(1): 39–71.Google Scholar
  7. Bruner, J.S.W., J.J. Goodnow, and G.A. Austin. 1956. A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Bruner, J.S.W. 1961. The process of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bruner, J.S.W. 1986. Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Buckley, J.P. 2012. The use of deception in interrogations. Paper presented as part of the Temple Law Review symposium on “deception and other strategic tactics used during police interrogations”. www.temple.edu/lawreview/2012/11/14/the-use-of-deception-in-interrogation. Accessed 9 Nov 2012.
  11. Cicerone, K.D., and J. Azulay. 2006. Perceived self-efficacy nd quality of life in traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 21(5): 408–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clare, I.C.H., and G.H. Gudjonsson. 2010. The vulnerability of suspects with intellectual disabilities during police interviews: A review and experimental study of decision-making. Mental Handicap Research 8(2): 110–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards, W., and S. Greenspan. 2011. Adaptive behavior and fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Journal of Psychiatry and Law. 39(4): 419–447.Google Scholar
  14. Fast, D., and J. Conry. 2006. The challenge of fetal alcohol syndrome in the criminal legal system. Addiction Biology 9(2): 161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foutopoulou, A. 2008. False selves in neuropsychological rehabilitation: The challenge of confabulation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation: An International Journal 18(5–6): 541–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenspan, S. 2009a. Foolish action in adults with Intellectual Disabilities: The forgotten problem of risk-unawareness. In International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, ed. L.M. Glidden. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  17. Greenspan, S., and J. Driscoll. 1997a. The role of intelligence in a broad model of personal competence. In Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests and issues, ed. D.P. Flanagan, J. Genshaft, and P. Harrison. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  18. Greenspan, S., and J. Driscoll. 1997b. Social intelligence and developmental disorder: Mental retardation, learning disabilities and autism. In Ellis’ handbook of mental deficiency, ed. W.F. MacLean, Jr. 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Greenspan, S., and Woods, G.W. 2014. Intellectual Disability as a disorder of reasoning and judgment: The gradual move away from IQ ceilings. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 27: 110–116.Google Scholar
  20. Gibbard, W.B., P. Wass, and M.E. Clarke. 2003. The neuropsychogical implications of prenatal alcohol exposure. Canadian Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Review 12(3): 72–76.Google Scholar
  21. Greenspan, S. (2009b). Annals of Gullibility. Westport: Praeger. Google Scholar
  22. Greenspan, S., N.N. Brown, and W. Edwards. (this volume). FASD and the concept of “intellectual disability equivalence.” In Ethical and legal issues in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder, eds. M. Nelson and M. Trussler. Amsterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Gudjonsson, G.H. 2003. The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Imbau, F.E., J.E. Reid, J.P. Buckely, and B.C. Byrne. 2011. Criminal interrogation and confessions. Byurlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning.Google Scholar
  25. Kant. E. 1781. Critique of pure reason. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Kassin, S.M., S.A. Drizin, T. Grisso, G.H. Gudjonsson, R.A. Leo, and A.D. Redlich. 2009. Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and human behavior, (access at http://ssm.com/abstract=1483878).
  27. Kassin, S.M., and G. Gudjonsson. 2004. The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 5(2): 33–67. (A supplement of Psychological Science).Google Scholar
  28. Kilchenbaum, N.M., K. Thomas, C.D. Molteno, N.C. Dodge, E.M. Meintjes, J.L. Jacobson, and S.W. Jacobson. 2012. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders and theory of mind: An exploratory study of South African children. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research 36(205A): 0145–06008.Google Scholar
  29. Leo, R.A., and S.A. Drizin. 2010. The three errors: Pathways to false confession and wrongful conviction. In Police interrogations and false confession: current research, practices and policy recommendations, eds. G.D. lassiter and C. Meissner. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  30. Loftus, E.F. (2004). The devil in confessions. Editorial in S.M. Kassin & G. Gudjonsson (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literture and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5 (2). (A supplement of Psychological Science).Google Scholar
  31. Mclachlan, K., and R. Roesch. (2012). Police interrogation experiences and false confessions: Examining the vulnerabilities of juveniles with FASD. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society. San Juan, Puerto Rico. Accessed 14 Mar 2012.Google Scholar
  32. McCloskey, G., and L.A. Perkins. 2012. Essentials of executive functions assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Nagel, T. 1973. Rawls on justice. The Philosophical Review 82(2): 220–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Perske, R. 2011. Perske’s list: False confessions from 75 persons with Intellectual Disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 49(5): 468–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rasmussen, C., K. Wyper, and C. Talwar. 2009. The relation between theory of mind and executive functions in children wirh fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Canadian Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 16(2): e370–e380.Google Scholar
  36. Skolnick, J.H. (1985). Deception by police. In Moral Issues in Police Work, eds. Elliston and Feldberg, 75–98. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  37. Strasser, M.P. 1991. The moral philosphy of John Stuart Mill. Lakefield, NH: Longwood Academic.Google Scholar
  38. Streissguth, A., and J. Kanter. 2002. The challenge in fetal alcohol syndrome: Overcoming secondary disabilities. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  39. Thorne, J.C., T.E. Coggins, O.H. Carmichael, and S.J. Astley. 2007. Exploring the utility of narrative analysis in diagnostic decision making: Picture-bound reference, elaboration, and fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 50(2): 459–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zalla, T., M. Phipps, and J. Grafman. 2014. Story processing in patients with damage to the prefrontal cortex. Cortex 38(2): 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zigler, E. (2013). Intelligence and cognitive exceptionality: The motivational perspective. In Cognition and motivation: Forging an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 433–449). ed. S. Kreitler. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ConnecticutMansfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations