Abstract
Retrieval analysis is an important aspect of medical device development. Examination of retrieved devices allows device developers to close the design loop, understand the performance of devices, and validate assumptions made and methods used during preclinical testing. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the implant retrieval analysis performed at the Implant Research Center at Drexel University on reverse total shoulder systems retrieved after short- to medium-term implantation. Our evaluations include assessment of the polyethylene bearing surface, glenosphere bearing surface damage, and tribocorrosion at the modular junctions. We have observed that polyethylene bearing surface wear (mode I) is limited in the short to medium term and that wear and damage of revised devices are dominated by unintentional contact and impingement of the inferior rim of the bushing (mode II damage). Scratching and damage of the glenosphere was a common observation, particularly in patients with a history of instability. Damage at the modular junctions was limited and dominated by fretting rather than corrosive damage. These observations provide an increased understanding of device performance and potential failure modes. Further studies will be necessary to characterize the long-term performance of reverse total shoulder systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Day JS, Lau E, Ong KL, Williams GR, Ramsey ML, Kurtz SM. Prevalence and projections of total shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in the United States to 2015. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(8):1115–20 (Epub 2010/06/18).
Health NIo, editor. Improving medical implant performance through retrieval information: challenges and opportunities. In: NIH technology assessment conference summary; Bethesda, MD; 10–12 Jan 2000.
Standards USNBo. Retrieval and analysis of orthopaedic implants. In: Standards USNBo, editor. Proceedings of a symposium held at the National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 5 Mar 1976 vol 472. National Bureau of Standards Special Publication, 1977.
International A. ASTM F561-13 standard practice for retrieval and analysis of medical devices, and associated tissues and fluids. West Conshohocken, PA, 2013.
Standardization IOf. ISO 12891-1:2011 Implants for surgery—retrieval and analysis of surgical implants—part 1: retrieval and handling. Geneve, 2011.
Standardization IOf. ISO 12891-2:2011 Retrieval and analysis of surgical implants—part 2: analysis of retrieved surgical implants. 2011.
Hood RW, Wright TM, Burstein AH. Retrieval analysis of total knee prostheses: a method and its application to 48 total condylar prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res. 1983;17(5):829–42 (Epub 1983/09/01).
Bowden AE, Kurtz SM, Edidin AA. Validation of a micro-CT technique for measuring volumetric wear in retrieved acetabular liners. J Biomed Mater Res. 2005;75(1):205–9.
Teeter MG, Brandt JM, Naudie DD, Bohm ER, McCalden RW, Holdsworth DW. Measurements of surface and subsurface damage in retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts of a contemporary design. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2012;22(1):21–31 (Epub 2012/09/29).
Teeter MG, Milner JS, Au JL, Lorusso D, Naudie DD, Holdsworth DW. Regional measurements of surface deviation volume in worn polyethylene joint replacement components. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2010;20(1):49–56 (Epub 2011/02/03).
Teeter MG, Naudie DD, Bourne RB, Holdsworth DW. How do CAD models compare with reverse engineered manufactured components for use in wear analysis? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(7):1847–54 (Epub 2011/10/22).
Teeter MG, Naudie DD, Charron KD, Holdsworth DW. Three-dimensional surface deviation maps for analysis of retrieved polyethylene acetabular liners using micro-computed tomography. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(2):330–2 (Epub 2009/12/22).
Day JS, MacDonald DW, Olsen M, Getz C, Williams GR, Kurtz SM. Polyethylene wear in retrieved reverse total shoulder components. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(5):667–74 (Epub 2011/07/05).
Nam D, Kepler CK, Nho SJ, Craig EV, Warren RF, Wright TM. Observations on retrieved humeral polyethylene components from reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(7):1003–12 (Epub 2010/09/18).
Terrier A, Merlini F, Pioletti DP, Farron A. Comparison of polyethylene wear in anatomical and reversed shoulder prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(7):977–82 (Epub 2009/07/02).
Levigne C, Boileau P, Favard L, Garaud P, Mole D, Sirveaux F, et al. Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(6):925–35 (Epub 2008/06/19).
Nyffeler RW, Werner CM, Gerber C. Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse delta III total shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(5):524–8 (Epub 2005/10/01).
Werner CM, Steinmann PA, Gilbart M, Gerber C. Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(7):1476–86 (Epub 2005/07/05).
Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, Hovorka I. Neer award 2005: the Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15(5):527–40 (Epub 2006/09/19).
Grassi FA, Murena L, Valli F, Alberio R. Six-year experience with the delta III reverse shoulder prosthesis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009;17(2):151–6 (Epub 2009/09/02).
Nyffeler RW, Werner CM, Simmen BR, Gerber C. Analysis of a retrieved delta III total shoulder prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(8):1187–91 (Epub 2004/12/01).
Isaac GH, Wroblewski BM, Atkinson JR, Dowson D. A tribological study of retrieved hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;276:115–25 (Epub 1992/03/01).
Kusaba A, Kuroki Y. Femoral component wear in retrieved hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79(2):331–6 (Epub 1997/03/01).
Malikian R, Maruthainar K, Stammers J, Cannon SR, Carrington R, Skinner JA, et al. In vivo roughening of retrieved total knee arthroplasty femoral components. Knee. 2014;21(1):278–82 (Epub 2012/11/13).
Que L, Topoleski LD, Parks NL. Surface roughness of retrieved CoCrMo alloy femoral components from PCA artificial total knee joints. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53(1):111–8 (Epub 2000/01/15).
Sychterz CJ, Engh CAJ, Swope SW, McNulty DE, Engh CA. Analysis of prosthetic femoral heads retrieved at autopsy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;358:223–34.
Davidson JA, Poggie RA, Mishra AK. Abrasive wear of ceramic, metal, and UHMWPE bearing surfaces from third-body bone, PMMA bone cement, and titanium debris. Biomed Mater Eng. 1994;4(3):213–29 (Epub 1994/01/01).
Kim YH, Ritchie A, Hardaker C. Surface roughness of ceramic femoral heads after in vivo transfer of metal: correlation to polyethylene wear. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(3):577–82 (Epub 2005/03/03).
Mai KT, Verioti C, D’Lima D, Colwell CW Jr, Ezzet KA Jr. Surface roughness of femoral head prostheses after dislocation. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010;39(10):495–500 (Epub 2011/02/04).
Elfick AP, Smith SL, Unsworth A. Variation in the wear rate during the life of a total hip arthroplasty: a simulator and retrieval study. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15(7):901–8 (Epub 2000/11/04).
Hall RM, Unsworth A, Siney P, Wroblewski BM. Wear in retrieved Charnley acetabular sockets. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 1996;210(3):197–207 (Epub 1996/01/01).
Kim YH, Kim JS. Tribological and material analyses of retrieved alumina and zirconia ceramic heads correlated with polyethylene wear after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(6):731–7 (Epub 2008/06/10).
Gilbert JL, Jacobs JJ. The mechanical and electrochemical processes associated with taper fretting crevice corrosion. a review. In: Marlow D, Parr J, Mayor MB, editors. Modularity of orthopedic implants. Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM; 1997. p. 45–59.
Jacobs JJ, Gilbert JL, Urban RM. Corrosion of metal orthopaedic implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:262–82.
Goldberg JR, Gilbert JL, Jacobs JJ, Bauer TW, Paprosky W, Leurgans S. A multicenter retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;401:149–61 (Epub 2002/08/02).
Kurtz SM, Kocagöz SB, Hanzlik JA, Underwood RJ, Gilbert JL, MacDonald DW, et al. Do ceramic femoral heads reduce taper fretting corrosion in hip arthroplasty? a retrieval study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(10):3270–82.
Higgs GB, Hanzlik JA, MacDonald DW, Gilbert JL, Rimnac CM, Kurtz SM. Is increased modularity associated with increased fretting and corrosion damage in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty devices? a retrieval study. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(8 Suppl):2–6 (Epub 2013/08/06).
Kocagöz SB, Underwood RJ, Sivan S, Gilbert JL, Macdonald DW, Day JS, et al. Does Taper angle clearance influence fretting and corrosion damage at the head-stem interface? a matched cohort retrieval study. Semin Arthroplasty. 2013;24(4):246–54.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge Gerald Williams MD, Matthew Ramsey MD, Charles Getz MD, Mark Lazarus MD, and Reuben Gobezie MD for providing retrieved implants. The Drexel University Implant Research Center, University Hospitals/Case Medical Center Orthopaedic Implant Retrieval Analysis Laboratory and Exponent, Inc. provided resources for the analysis of the implants. Steven Kurtz, Ph.D. Clare Rimnac, Ph.D. Dan MacDonald, Richard Underwood, Ph.D., Christina Arnholt, Genymphas Higgs, and Reagan McCloskey provided input and assisted in the analyses summarized here. Institutional funding has been received from the National Institutes of Health (NIAMS) R01 AR47904, CeramTec, Stryker Orthopaedics, Zimmer Inc., Ticona, Aesculap, and Invibio.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Day, J.S., Abboud, J.A. (2016). Implant Retrieval. In: Frankle, M., Marberry, S., Pupello, D. (eds) Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20840-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20840-4_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20839-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20840-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)