Skip to main content

Economic Experiments Used for the Evaluation of Building Users’ Energy-Saving Behavior

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy Performance of Buildings

Abstract

Several treatments that could be implemented in the home environment are evaluated with the objective of reaching a more rational and efficient use of energy. We feel that detailed knowledge of energy-consuming behavior is paramount for the development and implementation of new technologies, services, and even policies that could result in more rational energy use. The proposed evaluation methodology is based on the development of economic experiments implemented in an experimental economics laboratory, where the behavior of individuals when making decisions related to energy use in the domestic environment can be tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Conchado and Linares (2010) is an interesting survey of the state of the art in the quantification of demand response program benefits.

  2. 2.

    See Carroll and Mark (2009) and Carroll et al. (2009), for example.

  3. 3.

    Differences between winter and summer days are focused on the possibility of using a heating system that consumes gas energy.

  4. 4.

    The utility provided by the use of electricity depends on the amount consumed according to a concave function. Parameterizations of these functions for each appliance are available upon request.

  5. 5.

    Lighting is selected 24 h per period by default, and subjects must turn off the light at undesired hours by clicking on the square to the right of the corresponding hour.

  6. 6.

    Advice that was provided included sentences such as: (a) Turn off equipment when it’s not in use; (b) The microwave uses less energy than the oven and it can cook the same foods; (c) Remember to turn off lights when you leave the room; and (d) A bath costs more than a shower, etc.

  7. 7.

    Independent smart meters are offered for lighting, kitchen, gas consumption, leisure (TV, stereo, and computers) and others (washer, dishwasher, iron, and bathroom heater).

  8. 8.

    Due to the fact that only a part of the studied variables are normal, we have done all the statistical research using Mann-Whitney tests (the results of the Shapiro-Wilk test over those variables are shown in Table 7.5). Only in the particular case when comparing two variables with a normal distribution, the Mann-Whitney and t-test have been done. We have not detected any difference between the results of both tests in any case.

References

  • Abrahamse W, Steg L, Vlek C, Rothengatter T (2005) A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J Environ Psychol 25:273–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adilov N, Schuler RE, Schulze W, Toomey DE (2004) The effect of customer participation in electricity markets: an experimental analysis of alternative market structures. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences

    Google Scholar 

  • Adilov N, Schuler RE, Schulze W, Toomey DE, Zimmerman RZ (2005) Market structure and the predictability of electricity system line flows: An experimental analysis. In: Presented at 38th Annual Hawaii international conference on systems science, Waikoloa, HI

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres I, Raseman S, Shih A (2013) Evidence from two large field experiments that peer comparison feedback can reduce residential energy usage. J Law Econ Organ 29:992–1022

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreda-Tarrazona I, García-Gallego MA, Pavan M, Sabater-Grande G (2012) Demand response in experimental electricity markets. Revista Internacional de Sociología 70:27–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Battalio RC, Kagel J, Winkler RC, Winett RA (1979) Residential electricity demand: An experimental analysis. Rev Econ Stat 61(2):180–189. doi:10.2307/1924585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benders RMJ, Kok R, Moll HC, Wiersma G, Noorman KJ (2006) New approaches for household energy conservation—in search of personal household energy budgets and energy reduction options. Energy Policy 34(18):3612–3622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy Haney A, Jamasb T, Pollitt MG (2009) Smart metering and electricity demand: Technology, economics and international experience. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, Number 0905

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll E, Mark B (2009) Research to inform design of residential energy use behavior change pilot. Conservation Improvement Program Presentation for the Minnesota Office of Energy Security. (July) Franklin Energy

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll E, Eric H, Mark B (2009) Residential energy use behavior change pilot. CMFS project code B21383. (April) Franklin Energy

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, RB., Kallgren CA, Reno RR (1991) A Focus theory of normative conduct: a theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In: Zanna ZP (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 24. Academic Press, New York, pp. 201–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Conchado A, Linares P (2010) Estimación de los beneficios de la gestión activa de la demanda. Revisión del estado del arte y propuestas. Cuadernos Económicos de ICE 79:187–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmas MA, Fischlein M, Asensio OI (2013) Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: a meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012. Energy Policy 61:729–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhardt-Martinez K, Donnelly K, Laitner J (2010) Advanced metering initiatives and residential feedback programs: a meta-review for household electricity-saving opportunities. Technical Report E105, American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy

    Google Scholar 

  • Faruqui A, Sergici S (2009) Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of the experimental evidence. SSRN Report no. 1134132, Social Science Research Network, 10 Jan 2009. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1134132

  • Fisher C (2008) Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energ Effi 1:79–104. doi:10.1007/s12053-008-9009-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V (2008) A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J Consum Res 35(3):472–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Vladas G (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol Sci 18:429–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueno T, Sano F, Saeki O, Tsuji K (2006a) Effectiveness of an energy consumption information system on energy savings in residential houses based on monitored data. Appl Energy 83(8):166–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ueno T, Tsuji K, Nakano Y (2006b) Effectiveness of displaying energy consumption data in residential buildings: to know is to change. In: Proceedings of the ACEEE 2006 summer study on energy efficiency in buildings, vol 7. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, D.C., pp 264–277

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support by BP Chair of Energy Efficiency—UJI, the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (project ECO2011-23634), the Spanish Ministry of Economics and Competitiveness (project ECO2013-44409-P) and the Bank of Spain Excellence Chair in Computational Economics (project 11I229.01/1) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nieves García Martín , Gerardo Sabater-Grande , Aurora García-Gallego , Nikolaos Georgantzis , Iván Barreda-Tarrazona or Enrique Belenguer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martín, N.G., Sabater-Grande, G., García-Gallego, A., Georgantzis, N., Barreda-Tarrazona, I., Belenguer, E. (2016). Economic Experiments Used for the Evaluation of Building Users’ Energy-Saving Behavior. In: Boemi, SN., Irulegi, O., Santamouris, M. (eds) Energy Performance of Buildings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20831-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20831-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20830-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20831-2

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics