Using Context to Optimize a Functional State Estimation Engine in Unmanned Aircraft System Operations
As UAS operations continue to expand, the ability to monitor real-time cognitive states of human operators would be a valuable asset. Although great strides have been made toward this capability using physiological signals, the inherent noisiness of these data hinders its readiness for operational deployment. We theorize the addition of contextual data alongside physiological signals could improve the accuracy of cognitive state classifiers. In this paper, we review a cognitive workload model development effort conducted in a simulated UAS task environment at the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL). Real-time workload model classifiers were trained using three levels of physiological data inputs both with and without context added. Following the evaluation of each classifier using four model evaluation metrics, we conclude that by adding contextual data to physiological-based models, we improved the ability to reliably measure real-time cognitive workload in our UAS operations test case.
KeywordsContext Human performance Modeling and simulation Physiological measurement Workload UAS
Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. This material is based on work supported by AFRL under Contract FA8650-11-C-6236. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of AFRL.
- 1.Blackhurst, J., Gresham, J., Stone, M.: The quantified warrior: how DoD should lead human performance augmentation. Armed Forces Journal (2012)Google Scholar
- 5.Setz, C., Arnrich, B., Schumm, J., La Marca, R., Troster, G.: Discriminating stress from cognitive load using a wearable EDA device. Technology 14(2), 410–417 (2010)Google Scholar
- 10.Rowe, A.J., Liggett, K.K., Davis, J.E.: Vigilant spirit control station: a research testbed for multi-UAS supervisory control interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH (2009)Google Scholar
- 13.Finomore, V., Popik, D., Dallman, R., Stewart, J., Satterfield, K., Castle, C.: Demonstration of a network-centric communication management suite: multi-modal communication. In: Proceedings of the 55th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. HFES, Las Vegas (2011)Google Scholar
- 14.Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Peter, A.H., Najmedin, M. (eds.) Advances in Psychology, vol. 52, pp. 139–183. Elseiver, North-Holland (2006)Google Scholar