Skip to main content

Relevance of Evidence in Bayesian Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9161))

Abstract

For many inference tasks in Bayesian networks, computational efforts can be restricted to a relevant part of the network. Researchers have studied the relevance of a network’s variables and parameter probabilities for such tasks as sensitivity analysis and probabilistic inference in general, and identified relevant sets of variables by graphical considerations. In this paper we study relevance of the evidence variables of a network for such tasks as evidence sensitivity analysis and diagnostic test selection, and identify sets of variables on which computational efforts can focus. We relate the newly identified sets of relevant variables to previously established relevance sets and address their computation compared to these sets. We thereby paint an overall picture of the relevance of various variable sets for answering questions concerning inference and analysis in Bayesian network applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baker, M., Boult, T.: Pruning Bayesian networks for efficient computation. In: Bonissone, P.P., Henrion, M., Kanal, L.N., Lemmer, J.F. (eds.) Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 6, pp. 225–232. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coupé, V.M.H., van der Gaag, L.C.: Properties of sensitivity analysis of Bayesian belief networks. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 36(4), 323–356 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Druzdzel, M., Suermondt, H.: Relevance in probabilistic models: “backyards” in a “small world”. In: Working Notes of the AAAI 1994 Fall Symposium Series: Relevance, pp. 60–63 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jensen, F.V., Aldenryd, S.H., Jensen, K.B.: Sensitivity analysis in Bayesian networks. In: Froidevaux, C., Kohlas, J. (eds.) ECSQARU 1995. LNCS, vol. 946, pp. 243–250. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Jensen, F.V., Nielsen, T.D.: Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. Springer, New York (2007)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Meekes, M.: Sensitivity to evidence in probabilistic networks. Master’s thesis, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Park, J., Darwiche, A.: Complexity results and approximation strategies for MAP explanations. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 21, 101–133 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Shachter, R.: Bayes-ball: The rational pastime (for determining irrelevance and requisite information in belief networks and influence diagrams). In: Cooper, G., Moral, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 480–487. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silja Renooij .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Meekes, M., Renooij, S., van der Gaag, L.C. (2015). Relevance of Evidence in Bayesian Networks. In: Destercke, S., Denoeux, T. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9161. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20807-7_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20807-7_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20806-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20807-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics