Abstract
Beginning with a desire to develop an aesthetic model for curriculum and teaching in the arts, the author was challenged by an awakening of her moral concerns within arts education. First considering multiple sources who found a connection between morality and art or the aesthetic dimension, she finds limitations to each of their arguments, realizing further exploration of both the moral dimension and the aesthetic dimension was called for. The work of Martin Buber, Carol Gilligan, and James Macdonald is used to illuminate the significance of relationship as central to understanding the moral dimension. In probing the significance of relationship to the aesthetic dimension, the author identifies three particular views of relationship in art, each with quite different implications when applied to curriculum. Finding moral limitations to the first two (the objectivist approach emphasizing relationships within the work of art, and a second emphasizing relationship between the perceiver and the art work), the author proposes a third. An emphasis on the relationship between the perceiver and the larger world, with the aesthetic object as the lens through which we see/make sense of the reality of being a person-in-the-world, is suggested as the only kind of aesthetic model which sufficiently responds to moral concerns in curriculum.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beardsley, M. C. (1958). Aesthetics: Problems in the philosophy of criticism. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Buber, M. (1955). Between man and man (M. Friedman, Trans.). New York: Harper.
Buber, M. (1958). I and Thou (2nd ed.) (R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York: Charles Scribner’s.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Minton Balch.
Eisner, E. W. (1979). The educational imagination. New York: Macmillan.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Greene, M. (1978). Landscapes of learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hawkins, E. (1969). The body is a clear place. In M. Gray (Ed.), Focus on dance V: Composition (pp. 34–39). Washington, DC: American Association for Health, Physical Education & Recreation.
Kupfer, J. (1978). Aesthetic experience and moral education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 12(3), 13–22.
Macdonald, J. B. (1974). A transcendental developmental ideology of education. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Heightened consciousness, cultural revolution, and curriculum theory (pp. 85–116). Berkeley: McCutchan.
Macdonald, J. B. (1977). Value bases and issues for curriculum. In A. Molnar & J. Zahorik (Eds.), Curriculum theory (pp. 10–21). Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Macdonald, J. B., & Purpel, D. E. (1983). Curriculum planning: Visions and metaphors. In Z. Lamm (Ed.), New trends in education. Tel Aviv: Yachdar United.
Marcuse, H. (1978). The aesthetic dimension: Toward a critique of Marxist aesthetics. Boston: Beacon.
Newman, A. J. (1980). Aesthetic sensitizing and moral education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 14(2), 93–101.
Redfern, B. (1983). Dance, art and aesthetics. London: Dance Books.
Ross, M. (1981). You are the music. In M. Ross (Ed.), The aesthetic imperative: Relevance and responsibility in arts education (pp. 147–172). Oxford: Pergamon.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stinson, S.W. (2016). Curriculum and the Morality of Aesthetics (1985). In: Embodied Curriculum Theory and Research in Arts Education. Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20786-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20786-5_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20785-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20786-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)