Advertisement

“Biometric Dental Rosette” - Introduction into New Method of Dental Identification

  • Michał RychlikEmail author
  • Agnieszka Przystańska
  • Dorota Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska
  • Mariusz Glapiński
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9178)

Abstract

The hypothesis of the study was that human dentition is unique. This study was performed to analyze whether biometric methods using measurements and proportions are suitable for dental identification. The use of 3D models with specialized systems for computer aided engineering (CAE) and Reverse Engineering (RE) allowed for a number of point surface and volume comparative analyses. “Mapping” was carried out next on the dentition models. This procedure results in a set of curves and points depicting the characteristic features of the teeth and their edges respectively. Based on the “mapping” the so-called “biometric dental rosette” was created for the dentition models. The “biometric dental rosette” was created for maxillary and mandibular dentition models. Every rosette was individual thus unique. The method allowed for positive identification of all the volunteers. The presented studies are of preliminary character, and the continuation is necessary.

Keywords

Bitemarks Biometrics Forensic odontology 3D modeling Reverse Engineering CAME – Computer Aided Medical Engineering 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mrs. Ruth Hounam for her language support.

References

  1. 1.
    Aas, F.K.: The Body does not lie: identity, risk and trust in technoculture. Crime Media Cult. 2, 143–158 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Talabani, N., Al-Moussawy, N.D., Baker, F.A., Mohammed, H.A.: Digital analysis of experimental human bitemarks: application of two new methods. J. Forensic Sci. 51(6), 1372–1375 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bernitz, H., Owen, J.H., Heerden, W.F.P., Solheim, T.: An integrated technique for the analysis of skin bite marks. J. Forensic Sci. 53, 194–198 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blackwell, S.A., Taylor, R.V., Gordon, I., Ogleby, C.L., Tanijiri, T., Yoshino, M., Donald, M.R., Clement, J.G.: 3-D imaging and quantitative comparison of human dentitions and simulated bite marks. Int. J. Legal Med. 121, 9–17 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bowers, C.: Problem-based analysis of bitemark identification. The role of DNA Forensic Sci. Int. 159S, 104–109 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dorion, R.B.J. (ed.): Bitemark Evidence, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Emilio, M., Massari, S.: Body, biometrics and identity. Bioethics 22(9), 448–498 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freeman, A.J., Senn, D.R., Arendt, D.M.: Seven hundred seventy eight bite marks: analysis by anatomic location, victim and biter demographics, type of crime, and legal disposition. J. Forensic Sci. 50(6), 1436–1443 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jain, K.A.: An introduction to biometric recognition. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 14(1), 1–10 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin-de-las-Heras, S., Tafura, D.: Comparison of simulated human dermal bitemarks possessing three-dimensional attributes to suspected biters using a proprietary three-dimensional comparison. Forensic Sci. Int. 190, 33–37 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Metcalf, R.D., Lee, G., Gould, L.A., Stickels, J.: Bite this! The role of bite marks analyses in wrongful convictions. Southw. J. Crim. Just. 7, 47–64 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Naether, S., Buck, U., Campana, L., Breitbeck, R., Thali, M.: The examination and identification of bite marks in foods using 3D scanning and 3D comparison methods. Int. J. Legal Med. 126(1), 89–95 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pretty, I.A.: The barriers to achieving an evidence base for bitemark analysis. Forensic Sci. Int. 159S, 110–120 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pretty, I.A., Sweet, D.: The scientific basis for human bitemark analyses—a critical review. Sci. Justice 41, 85–92 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Przystańska, A., Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska, D., Rychlik, M., Glapiński, M., Łabęcka, M., Sobol, J., Żaba, C.: The effectiveness of 2D and 3D methods in analysis of experimental bitemarks Dent. Med. Probl. 52 (2015) (in press)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosenzweig, P., Kochems, A., Schwartz, A.: Biometric Technologies: Security, legal and policy implications. Legal Memorandum 12, 1–10 (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rychlik, M., Stankiewicz, W.: Extraction of 3D geometrical features of biological objects with 3D PCA analysis and applications of results. In: G.R. Naik (ed.) Applied Biological Engineering – Principles and Practice, Chapter 4, pp. 85–112. InTech (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rychlik, M., Stankiewicz, W., Morzynski, M.: 3D facial biometric database – search and reconstruction of objects based on PCA modes. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8513, pp. 125–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rychlik, M., Stankiewicz, W., Morzynski, M.: Numerical analysis of geometrical features of 3D biological objects, for three-dimensional biometric and anthropometric database. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in HCI, Part II, HCII 2011. LNCS, vol. 6766, pp. 108–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Santoro, V., Lozito, P., De Donno, A., Introna, F.: Experimental study of bite mark injuries by digital analysis. J. Forensic Sci. 56, 224–228 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sheets, H.D., Bush, M.A.: Mathematical matching of a dentition to bitemarks: use and evaluation of affine methods. Forensic Sci. Int. 207, 111–118 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thali, M.J., Braun, M., Markwalder, T., Brueschweiler, W., Zollinger, U., Malik, N.J., Yen, K., Dirnhofer, R.: Bite mark documentation and analysis: 3D/CAD supported photogrammetry approach. Forensic Sci. Int. 135, 115–121 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michał Rychlik
    • 1
    Email author
  • Agnieszka Przystańska
    • 2
    • 3
  • Dorota Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska
    • 3
  • Mariusz Glapiński
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of Virtual EngineeringPoznań University of TechnologyPoznańPoland
  2. 2.Department of AnatomyPoznan University of Medical SciencesPoznańPoland
  3. 3.Department of Forensic MedicinePoznan University of Medical SciencesPoznańPoland
  4. 4.Oral Rehabilitation ClinicPoznan University of Medical SciencesPoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations