Advertisement

Usability Heuristics for the Design of Interactive Attention Assessment and Rehabilitation Technologies

  • Layla Al-Salhie
  • Weaám AlRashed
  • Areej Al-WabilEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9177)

Abstract

Emerging technologies are beginning to find their way in different health care centers and clinics worldwide for the purpose of assessment and rehabilitation for people with attention deficit disorders. And due to the variation in the practitioners and patients’ requirements and preferences for using these technologies, understanding the usability issues has become essential for further development in this domain. In particular, addressing issues of selecting usability evaluation methods and their effectiveness in identifying usability problems. A bespoke heuristic set for the context of intervention programs for developing sustained attention is proposed and tested. In this study, we conducted usability heuristic evaluations on three sustained attention assessment and rehabilitation programs that involve emerging technologies; which are Neurofeedback and eye tracking. The heuristic evaluation was conducted by five evaluators, and the results showed that the proposed heuristic inspection evaluation method was effective in finding major usability problems in programs designed for sustained attention assessment and rehabilitation. Moreover, recommendations were presented regarding the evaluators’ experience with the evaluated interactive programs, the contexts of usage, target user communities, and the technical background knowledge of the interaction modalities.

Keywords

Attention Usability Heuristic evaluation Eye tracking Neurofeedback 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was partially funded by King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST). The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding the work through the research group project number RGP-VPP-157.

References

  1. 1.
    Ballard, J.C.: Computerized assessment of sustained attention: a review of factors affecting vigilance performance. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 18(6), 843–863 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nielsen, J., Rolf, M.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability inspection methods. In: Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kientz, J.A., et al.: Heuristic evaluation of persuasive health technologies. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alsumait, A., Asma A.-O.: Usability heuristics evaluation for child e-learning applications. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-Based Applications & Services. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hersh, M.A., Barbara, L.: Accessibility and usability of educational gaming environments for disabled students. In: ICALT (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Walker, J.M., Achilles N.B.: Review: play attention interactive learning tool, by Freer, P. J. Attention Disord (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Shathri, A., Al-Wabil, A., Al-Ohali, Y.: Eye-controlled games for behavioral therapy of attention deficit disorders. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCII 2013, Part I. CCIS, vol. 373, pp. 574–578. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    AlOmar, A., et al.: Interactive therapy of attention deficit disorders with gaze-based games. In: Proceedings of the 10th Pacific Conference of Computer Human Interaction. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nielsen, J.: Severity ratings for usability problems. Papers and Essays (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability inspection methods. In: Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jeffries, R., et al.: User interface evaluation in the real world: a comparison of four techniques. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (1991)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Law, L.-C., Thora Hvannberg, E.: Complementarity and convergence of heuristic evaluation and usability test: a case study of universal brokerage platform. In: Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Layla Al-Salhie
    • 1
  • Weaám AlRashed
    • 1
  • Areej Al-Wabil
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Software Engineering Department, College of Computer and Information SciencesKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations