Usability Heuristics for the Design of Interactive Attention Assessment and Rehabilitation Technologies
Emerging technologies are beginning to find their way in different health care centers and clinics worldwide for the purpose of assessment and rehabilitation for people with attention deficit disorders. And due to the variation in the practitioners and patients’ requirements and preferences for using these technologies, understanding the usability issues has become essential for further development in this domain. In particular, addressing issues of selecting usability evaluation methods and their effectiveness in identifying usability problems. A bespoke heuristic set for the context of intervention programs for developing sustained attention is proposed and tested. In this study, we conducted usability heuristic evaluations on three sustained attention assessment and rehabilitation programs that involve emerging technologies; which are Neurofeedback and eye tracking. The heuristic evaluation was conducted by five evaluators, and the results showed that the proposed heuristic inspection evaluation method was effective in finding major usability problems in programs designed for sustained attention assessment and rehabilitation. Moreover, recommendations were presented regarding the evaluators’ experience with the evaluated interactive programs, the contexts of usage, target user communities, and the technical background knowledge of the interaction modalities.
KeywordsAttention Usability Heuristic evaluation Eye tracking Neurofeedback
This work was partially funded by King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST). The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding the work through the research group project number RGP-VPP-157.
- 2.Nielsen, J., Rolf, M.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (1990)Google Scholar
- 3.Nielsen, J.: Usability inspection methods. In: Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (1994)Google Scholar
- 4.Kientz, J.A., et al.: Heuristic evaluation of persuasive health technologies. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
- 5.Alsumait, A., Asma A.-O.: Usability heuristics evaluation for child e-learning applications. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-Based Applications & Services. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
- 6.Hersh, M.A., Barbara, L.: Accessibility and usability of educational gaming environments for disabled students. In: ICALT (2012)Google Scholar
- 7.Walker, J.M., Achilles N.B.: Review: play attention interactive learning tool, by Freer, P. J. Attention Disord (2008)Google Scholar
- 9.AlOmar, A., et al.: Interactive therapy of attention deficit disorders with gaze-based games. In: Proceedings of the 10th Pacific Conference of Computer Human Interaction. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
- 10.Nielsen, J.: Severity ratings for usability problems. Papers and Essays (1995)Google Scholar
- 11.Nielsen, J.: Usability inspection methods. In: Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (1995)Google Scholar
- 12.Jeffries, R., et al.: User interface evaluation in the real world: a comparison of four techniques. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (1991)Google Scholar
- 13.Law, L.-C., Thora Hvannberg, E.: Complementarity and convergence of heuristic evaluation and usability test: a case study of universal brokerage platform. In: Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM (2002)Google Scholar