Rehabilitation of Balance-Impaired Stroke Patients Through Audio-Visual Biofeedback

  • Cristina Gheorghe
  • Thomas Nissen
  • Daniel Christensen
  • Paula EpureEmail author
  • Anthony Brooks
  • Eva Petersson Brooks
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9177)


This study explored how audio-visual biofeedback influences physical balance of seven balance-impaired stroke patients, between 33–70 years-of-age. The setup included a bespoke balance board and a music rhythm game. The procedure was designed as follows: (1) a control group who performed a balance training exercise without any technological input, (2) a visual biofeedback group, performing via visual input, and (3) an audio-visual biofeedback group, performing via audio and visual input. Results retrieved from comparisons between the data sets (2) and (3) suggested superior postural stability between test sessions for (2). Regarding the data set (1), the testers were less motivated to perform training exercises although their performance was superior to (2) and (3). Conclusions are that the audio component motivated patients to train although the physical performance was decreased.


Audio-visual biofeedback Stroke rehabilitation Postural stability 


  1. 1.
    Mirelman, A., Herman, T., Nicolai, S., Zijlstra, A., Zijlstra, W., Becker, C., Chiari, L., Hausdorff, J.: Audio-Biofeedback training for posture and balance in Patients with Parkinson’s disease. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 8, 1–7 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hurkmans, H.L., Bussmann, J.B., Benda, E., Verhaar, J.A., Stam, H.J.: Effectiveness of audio feedback for partial weight-bearing in and outside the hospital: a randomized controlled trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 93, 565–570 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, Y., Huang, H., Xu, W., Wallis, R.I., Sundaram, H., Rikakis, T., Ingalls, T., Olson, L., He, J.: The design of a real-time, multimodal biofeedback system for stroke patient rehabilitation. In: 14th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 763–772. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Geiger, R.A.: Balance and mobility following stroke: effects of physical therapy interventions with and without biofeedback/forceplate training. Phys. Ther. 81, 995–1005 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Walker, C., Brouwer, B.J.: Use of visual feedback in retraining balance following acute stroke. Phys. Ther. 80, 886–895 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders.
  7. 7.
    Salzman, B.: Gait and balance disorders in older adults. Am. Fam. Physician 82, 61–68 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thorvaldsen, P., Davidsen, M., Bronnum-Hansen, H., Schroll, M.: Stable stroke occurrence despite incidence reduction in an aging population: stroke trends in the danish monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease (MONICA) population. Stroke 30, 2529–2534 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sims, N.R., Muyderman, H.: Mitochondria, oxidative metabolism and cell death in stroke. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1802, 80–91 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eckerle, B.J., Southerland, A.M.: Bedside Evaluation of the Acute Stroke Patient. Wiley, Oxford (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Winter, D.A.: Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait Posture 3, 193–214 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hunter, M.C., Hoffman, M.A.: Postural control: visual and cognitive manipulations. Gait Posture 13, 41–48 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhong, X., Yost, W.A.: Relationship between postural stability and spatial hearing. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 24, 782–788 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Macdougall, R.: The relation of auditory rhythm to nervous discharge. Am. Psychol. Assoc. 9, 460–480 (1902)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anshel, M.H., Marisi, D.Q.: Effect of music and rhythm on physical performance. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 49, 109–113 (1978)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brooks, T.: HUMANICS 1. a feasibility study to create a home internet-based telehealth product to supplement acquired brain injury therapy. Int. J. Disabil Hum. Dev. 4, 277–282 (2005)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Preece, J.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gfeller, K.: Musical components and styles preferred by young adults for aerobic fitness activities. J. Music Ther. 25, 28–43 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    He, H., Ingalls, T., Olson, L., Ganley, K., Rikakis, T., Jiping, H.: Interactive multimodal biofeedback for task-oriented neural rehabilitation. In: 27th IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, pp. 2547–2550. IEEE Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sweetser, P., Wyeth, P.: GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. CIE ACM. 3, 1–24 (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brooks, T., Camurri, A., Canagarajah, N., Hasselblad, S.: Interaction with shapes and sounds as a therapy for special needs and rehabilitation. In: 4th International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies, pp. 205–212. ICDVRAT and The University of Reading (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristina Gheorghe
    • 1
  • Thomas Nissen
    • 1
  • Daniel Christensen
    • 1
  • Paula Epure
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anthony Brooks
    • 1
  • Eva Petersson Brooks
    • 1
  1. 1.Department for Media TechnologyAalborg UniversityEsbjergDenmark

Personalised recommendations