Advertisement

(Digital) Social Innovation Through Public Internet Access Points

  • Christoph Kaletka
  • Bastian PelkaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9175)

Abstract

The post-industrial innovation system with its distinct focus on social innovation allows for theoretical and conceptual connections between innovation research and new fields of social practice. In this article we elaborate on the potential of social innovation and especially digital social innovation to tackle digitally excluded persons’ needs. Public internet access points are key infrastructures driving the digital inclusion of marginalized persons. Empirical results presented in this paper shows that these players act socially innovative by creating collaborative spaces for digital inclusion, by developing hybrid staff competence profiles and by creating community-based, intergenerational learning content. The paper relates research perspectives from the social innovation and the digital inclusion discourse and argues against the background of research and development results of six EU funded projects on social innovation and/or digital inclusion in the years 2011–2015.

Keywords

Telecentre Digital gap Digital inclusion Social innovation Digital social innovation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper builds on the results of the research project SIMPACT – “Boosting the Impact of Social Innovation in Europe through Economic Underpinnings”. SIMPACT has received funding from the EU’s 7th Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under GA No. 613411.

References

  1. 1.
    Howaldt, J., Butzin, A., Domanski, D., Kaletka, C.: Theoretical approaches to social innovation - a critical literature review. A Deliverable of the Project: ‘Social Innovation: Driving Force of Social Change’ (SI-DRIVE), European Commission – 7th Framework Programme. SFS, Dortmund (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Howaldt, J., Schwarz, M.: Social innovation: concepts, research fields and inter-national trends. In: Henning, K., Hees, F. (eds.) Studies for Innovation in a Modern Working Environment - International Monitoring, vol. 5 (2010). http://www.sfs-dort-mund.de/odb/Repository/Publication/DocC1289CIMO_Trendstudie_Howaldt_Schwarz_englische_Version.pdf
  3. 3.
    Schumpeter, J.A.: Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin (1964)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Howaldt, J., Kopp, R., Schwarz, M. (eds.): Zur Theorie sozialer Innovationen. In: Tardes vernachlässigter Beitrag zur Entwicklung einer soziologischen Innovationstheorie, Wiesbaden (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rehfeld, D., Terstriep, J., Welschhoff, J., Alijani, S.: Comparative report on SI framework. Deliverable D1.1 of the Project: ‘Boosting the Impact of SI in Europe Through Economic Underpinnings’ (SIMPACT), EC – 7th Framework Programme. European Commission, DG Research & Innovation, Brussels (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gabriel, M.: Making it Big: Strategies for Scaling Social Innovations. National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA), London (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rissola, G., Garrido, M.: Survey on eInclusion Actors in the EU27 (2013). http://www.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC84429.pdf
  8. 8.
    Wallin, S.: The co-evolvement in local development - from the triple to the quadruple helix model. In: Conference Paper at Triple Helix VIII, Madrid, October 2010. www.triplehelix8.org
  9. 9.
    Sgaragli, F.: Enabling Social Innovation Ecosystems for Community-led Territorial Development. Fondazione Giacomo Brodolini, Rome (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sinnergiak Social Innovation & Innobasque, Regional Innovation Index. Innobasque Publishing (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Casebourne, J., Armstrong, K. (eds.): Digital social innovation. Second Interim Study Report (2014). http://content.digitalsocial.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/FINAL-2ND-INTERIM-STUDY-REPORT.pdf
  12. 12.
    Bria, F.: Digital social innovation. Interim Report (2014). http://content.digitalsocial.eu/resource-category/research/
  13. 13.
    Millard, J., Carpenter, G.: Digital technology in social innovation: synthesis, gaps and recommendations. A Deliverable of the Project: ‘The Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Foundation for Building Social Innovation in Europe’ (TEPSIE), European Commission – 7th Framework Programme. EC, Brussels (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bühler, C., Pelka, B.: Empowerment by digital media of people with disabilities, three levels of support. In: Miesenberger, K., Fels, D., Archambault, D., Peňáz, P., Zagler, W. (Hrsg.) 14th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs, ICCHP 2014, Paris, France, 9–11 July 2014, Proceedings, Part I (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bühler, C.: Universal design – computer. In: International Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation, Chapter. 146. Center for International Rehabilitation Research Information and Exchange (CIRRIE) (2010). http://cirrie.buffalo.edu/encyclopedia/en/article/146/
  16. 16.
    Eurostat, Internet use by individuals. Code: tin00028, % of individuals aged 16 to 74 Last internet use: within last 3 months (2014). http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/refreshTableAction.do?tab=table&plugin=1&pcode=tin00028&language=en
  17. 17.
    Kaletka, C., Pelka, B., Diaz, A., Rastrelli, M.: eScouts: Intergenerational Learning In Blended Environments And Spaces (ILBES) for social inclusion. In: European Distance and eLearning Network (EDEN) (2012). www.eden-online.org/system/files/Annual_2012_Porto_BOA.pdf
  18. 18.
    eFacilitator: Results of a multi-country analysis: context in four countries (2012). http://www.efacilitator.eu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/VET4e-i_Multi-Country_Context_AnalysisDEF.pdf
  19. 19.
    Pelka, B., Kaletka, C.: eFacilitators: functional hybrids between ICT teaching and community management. In: Proceedings of the ECER VETNET Conference (2012). http://www.b.shuttle.de/wifo/vetnet/ecer12.htm, http://vetnet.mixxt.org/networks/files/file.111156
  20. 20.
    eScouts: Deliverable 3.2: context analysis, Part 2: Facilitators (2012). http://escouts8.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/escouts-context-analysis-facilitators.pdf
  21. 21.
    Keycompetences: online employment toolkit. In: Guidelines for stakeholders and new actors (2012). http://www.keycompetences.eu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/booklet_English_guidllines_r2.pdf
  22. 22.
    Pelka, B.; Kaletka, C.: Web 2.0 zwischen technischer und sozialer Innovation: Anschluss an die medientheoretische Debatte. In: Howaldt, J.; Jacobsen, H. (eds.) Soziale Innovation. Auf dem Weg zu einem postindustriellen Innovationsparadigma, pp. 143–161. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pelka, B., Kaletka, C.: Blended learning spaces as a social innovation for Local Inclusion. In: EIRP Proceedings on Integration and Employability, vol. 7 (2012). http://www.proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/1362/1308

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TU Dortmund UniversityDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations