Advertisement

Using Interpretive Structural Modeling to Make Decisions for Direction of Caring Design

  • Ming-Tang WangEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9175)

Abstract

Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) is a well-established methodology for identifying relationships among specific items, which define a problem or an issue. The natural caring is born with human beings; besides caring persons the natural environment is also important. In this research, Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) is used to make decision for design direction of rescuing injury in landslide disaster, recognized the main target to solve ease of use and independent problems (level 1) and the main problem are reliability issues (level 2), the safe issue (Level 3), the security issue (level 4) for the proposed stretcher. Finally, the design direction is concluded, new stretcher structure was proposed to be independent and confident for conveying, and collecting the scenario for ATV drag rescue stretcher.

Keywords

Caring design Design direction ISM Make decision 

References

  1. 1.
    Noddings, N.: Educating Moral People: A Caring Alternative to Character Education. Teachers College, Columbia University Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Noddings, N.: Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education, p. 170. University of California Press, Berkeley (1984)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Sage, A.P.: Interpretive Structural Modeling: Methodology for Large Scale Systems. McGraw-Hill, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Warfield, J.N.: Developing interconnected matrices in structural modelling. IEEE Trans. Syst. Men Cybern. 4(1), 51–81 (1974)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singh, M.D., Kant, R.: Knowledge management barriers: an interpretive structural modeling approach. Int. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Manag. 3(2), 141–150 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Warfield, J.N.: An Assault on Complexity. Battelle Monograph, vol. 3. Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus (1973)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Warfield, J.N.: Structuring Complex Systems. Battelle Monograph, vol. 4. Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus (1974)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Warfield, J.N.: Implication structures for system interconnection-matrices. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 6(1) (1976)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., Tiwari, M.K.: Modeling agility of supply chain. Ind. Mark. Manag. 36, 443–457 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Attri, R., Dev, N., Sharma, V.: Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach: an overview. Res. J. Manag. Sci. 2(2), 3–8 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harary, F., Norman, R., Cartwright, D.: Structural Models. Wiley, New York (1965)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Faisal, M.N., Banwet, D.K., Shankar, R.: Supply chain risk mitigation: modelling the enablers. Bus. Proc. Manag. J. 12(4), 535–552 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malone, D.W.: An introduction to the application of interpretive structural modeling. Proc. IEEE 63(3), 397–404 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, Y.C., Chao, Y.H., Lin, S.B.: Structural approach to design user interface. Comput. Ind. 61, 613–623 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hsiao, S.W., Ko, Y.C., Lo, C.H., Chen, S.H.: An ISM, DEI, and ANP based approach for product family development. Adv. Eng. Inform. 27, 131–148 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jharkharia, S., Shankar, R.: IT-enablement of supply chains: understanding the barriers. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 18(1), 11–27 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cagan, J., Vogel, C.M.: Creating Breakthrough Products: Revealing the Secrets that Drive Global Innovation. Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hasan, M.A., Shankar, R., Sarkis, J.: A study of barriers to agile manufacturing. Int. J. Agile Syst. Manag. 2(1), 1–22 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ravi, V., Shankar, R., Tiwari, M.K.: Productivity improvement of a computer hardware supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Meas. 54(4), 239–255 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Deng, Z.Y., Wang, Q.Y.: Landslide in quake-hit Lushan kills 3. http://en.people.cn/90882/8239004.html
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Department of EducationNational Kaohsiung Normal UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan, R.O.C

Personalised recommendations