Skip to main content

Vulnerability Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Natural Disaster Risk Management
  • 2298 Accesses

Abstract

In 2010 there were three earthquakes all of magnitude about 8 on the Richter scale that caused totally different impacts: In Chile the earthquake claimed the life of 500 people, affected 3 million, and caused a loss of US$30 billion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benson, C. & Twigg, J. (2007): Tools for disaster risk reduction - Guidance Notes for Development Organisations. - International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; the ProVention Consortium Secretariat, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, R. & Stanford, L. (1998): The Northridge earthquake: community-based approaches to unmet recovery needs.- Disasters, Vol. 22, No. 1, p. 21-38, Wiley Online Library

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckle, P. (1998): Re-defining community and vulnerability in the context of emergency management. –Queensland State Emergency Recovery Unit, Department of Human Services, Australian Journal of Emergency Management, Mount Macedon, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, T. (2008): Vulnerability, “innocent” disasters and the imperative of cultural understanding.- Disaster Prevention and Management, Vol. 17, No. 3, p.350-357, Emerald Group Publishing Limited (online: www.emeraldinsight.com/0965-3562.htm)

  • Cardona, O. (2003): The need for rethinking the concept of vulnerability and risk from a holistic perspective: A necessary review and criticism for effective risk management; in: Bankoff, G., Frerks, D. & Hilhorst: D. (eds): Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development and People.- Earthscan Publisher, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, A., Zoppou, C., Nielsen, O., Day, S. & Roberts, S. (2004): Quantifying social vulnerability: A methodology for identifying those at risk to natural hazards.- Geoscience Australia Record 2004/14, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakin, H. & Luers, A.L. (2006): Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. – Annual Revue Environmental Resources, Vol. 31, p.365–394, Palo Alto CA

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2004): Using HAZUS-MH for Risk Assessment - HAZUS-MH Risk Assessment and User Group Series Using; How to Guide. - Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Publication 433, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2012): Emergency Response Plan- Resources for Protective Actions for Life Safety.-Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Ready Campaign, Washington DC (online: www.fema.org; last update 12/19/2012)

  • Kammel, L. (2012): Methodischer Ansatz zum Vergleich der Risikobewertung verschiedener Naturgefahrentypen am Beispiel von Zentraljava, Indonesien. - Bachelor Thesis (unpublished), Faculty of Geosciences University Goettingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. & Garrick, B.J. (1981): Risk Analysis, Vol. 1, No 1, Wiley Online Library

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R.E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H.S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J.X. & Ratick S. (1988): The social amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework. – Risk Analysis, Vol. 8, No. 2, Wiley Online Library

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R.J.T., Nicholls, R.J. & Thomalla, F. (2003): Resilience to natural hazards: how useful is this concept?.- Global Environmental Change, Part B: Environmental Hazards, Vol. 5, No.(1–2, p.35–45 (online: doi:10.1016/j.hazards.2004.02.001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, B.H. (1999): Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. - Disasters, Vol.23 Issue 1, p. 1-18, Wiley Online Library

    Google Scholar 

  • Omvidar, B., Gatmiri, B. & Derakhshan, S. (2011): Experimental vulnerability curves for the residential buildings in Iran. – Natural Hazards, Springer Link (online: DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-0019-y)

  • PAHO/WHO (1998): Natural disaster mitigation in drinking water and sewerage systems – Guidelines for vulnerability analysis.- Pan American Health Organization – World Health Organization, Disaster Mitigation Series, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Peduzzi,P., Dao, H., Herold,C. with contributions from A. Martin Diaz, F. Mouton, O. Nordbeck, D. Rochette, T. Ton-That, B. Widmer (2002): Global Risk and Vulnerability Index-Trends per Year (GRAVITY) - Phase II: Development, analysis and results. - The Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery of the United Nation Development Program, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Peduzzi, P., Dao, H., Herold, C. & Mouton, F. (2009): Assessing global exposure and vulnerability towards natural hazards: the Disaster Risk Index. – Natural Hazards Earth Systems Sciences, Vol. 9 p.1149—1159, Copernicus Publications, Goettingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. & Lichtenstein, S. (1982): Why Study Risk Perception?. – Risk Analysis, Vol. 2, Issue 2, p.83-93, Wiley Online Library

    Google Scholar 

  • Thywissen, K. (2006): Core terminology of disaster reduction: A comparative glossary; in: Birkmann, J.: Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards - Towards disaster resilient societies . - United Nations University Press, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-AFD (2004): United Nations Development Program’s Adaptation Policy Framework for Climate Change: Developing strategies, policies and measures. - United Nations Development Program (UNDP), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDRO (1991): Mitigating natural disasters phenomena, effects and options. – A manual for policy makers and planners. – Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Co-ordinator, United Nations, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR (2004): Living with Risk - A Global Review of Disaster Reduction Initiatives”. – United Nation International Strategy of Disaster Reduction (UNISDR), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU (1999): Welt im Wandel – Strategien zur Bewältigung globaler Umweltrisiken. – Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltverän-derungen, Jahresgutachten 1998, Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T. & Davis, I. (2004): At Risk - Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. - Routledge, London - New York NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Ranke .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ranke, U. (2016). Vulnerability Assessment. In: Natural Disaster Risk Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20675-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics