Abstract
This chapter describes a steady-state sensitivity analysis based on a design point, considering each of the four configurations proposed in Chap. 5. This approach deals with a simulation-based analysis that allows estimation of overall efficiency over a wide range of boundary conditions to determine which cogeneration system is the most optimal in terms of capital cost (overall efficiency is directly related to the solar field size required). The analysis was performed for the three existing cooling technologies: once-through, evaporative water cooling and dry air cooling (except for the case in which a low-temperature (LT) multi-effect distillation (MED) unit replaces the condenser in the parabolic-trough concentrating solar power [PT-CSP] plant). The specific electric consumption (SEC) and the exhaust steam temperature were taken as inputs to be varied for a wide range of conditions that cover all the locations between the Mediterranean basin and the Arabian Gulf and match the three cooling systems considered. The simulations were carried out using the models described in Chaps. 3, 4 and 5. The study evaluated in which cases the PT-CSP + MED configurations are more efficient than the PT-CSP + RO configuration. Note that the results given in this chapter are valid only for parabolic-trough solar technology; thus, they could change for a different solar technology. Finally, a detailed techno-economic analysis is described for two representative locations in the Mediterranean basin and the Arabian Gulf, with the aim of determining the most suitable configuration and refrigeration system in each location. Specific operating conditions were established for each location, based on similar studies and information from real plants.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- Cr:
-
Compression ratio
- CSP + D:
-
Concentrating solar power and desalination
- DNI:
-
Direct normal irradiation (kWh/m2 year)
- EES:
-
Engineering equation solver
- GOR:
-
Gain output ratio
- LEC:
-
Levelised electricity cost (c€/kWh)
- LT-MED:
-
Low temperature multi-effect distillation
- LT-MED + TVC:
-
Low temperature multi-effect distillation powered by a thermal vapour compressor
- LWC:
-
Levelised water cost (€/m3)
- MENA:
-
Middle East and North Africa
- PT:
-
Parabolic trough
- Ra:
-
Entrainment ratio
- RO:
-
Reverse osmosis
- MED-TVC:
-
Multi-effect distillation with thermal vapour compression
- P net :
-
Net power production (MWe)
- ṁ :
-
Mass flow rate (kg/s)
- F FW :
-
Fresh water flow rate (m3/day)
- P cond :
-
Power consumed by the condenser (MWe)
- h :
-
Specific enthalpy (kJ/kg)
- P th :
-
Net output thermal capacity (MWth)
- M d :
-
Distillate mass flow rate (kg/s)
- M mv :
-
Motive steam mass flow rate (kg/s)
- M ent :
-
Entrained vapour mass flow rate (kg/s)
- η th :
-
Global efficiency
- F sw :
-
Seawater flow rate (m3/day)
- M d,net :
-
Net fresh water production (m3/day)
- M d,gross :
-
Gross fresh water production (m3/day)
- P turb :
-
Gross power production (MWe)
- A a :
-
Aperture area (m2)
- F s :
-
Solar fraction
- crf:
-
Capital recovery factor
- K invest :
-
Total investment of the plant (€)
- K O & M :
-
Annual operation and maintenance costs (€)
- K fuel :
-
Annual fuel cost (€)
- E net :
-
Net electricity delivered to the grid (GWh)
- k d :
-
Real debt interest rate (%)
- n :
-
Depreciation period (years)
- K insurance :
-
Annual insurance rate (%)
References
Blanco-Marigorta, A. M., Sánchez-Henríquez, M. V., & Peña-Quintana, J. A. (2011). Exergetic comparison of two different cooling technologies for the power cycle of a thermal power plant. Energy, 36, 1966–1972.
El-Dessouky, H., & Ettouney, H. (2002). Fundamentals of salt water desalination (1st ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
Geyer, M., Herrmann, U., Sevilla, A., Nebrera, J. A., & Zamora, A. G. (2006, June 20–23). Dispatchable solar electricity for summerly peak loads from the solar thermal projects Andasol-1 & Andasol-2. In: Proceedings of 13th SolarPACES Symposium, Seville, Spain.
Goebel, O. (2010, September 21–24). Shams One 100 MW CSP plant in Abu Dhabi. Update on projects status. In: Proceedings of 16th SolarPACES symposium, Perpignan, France.
IDA. (2013). IDA desalination yearbook 2012–2013: Water desalination report. Topsfield, MA: Global Water Intelligence/International Desalination Association.
Klein, S. A., Alvarado, F. L., & Beckman, W. A. (1997). Engineering Equation Solver (EES), Mc Version 4.447. F-Chart Software. Middleton, WI.
NREL. (2010). System advisor model (SAM). National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Retrieved from https://sam.nrel.gov/cost
Palenzuela, P., Zaragoza, G., Alarcón-Padilla, D. C., Guillén-Burrieza, E., Ibarra, M., & Blanco, J. (2011a). Assessment of different configurations for combined parabolic-trough (PT) solar power and desalination plants in arid regions. Energy, 36, 4950–8.
Palenzuela, P., Zaragoza, G., Alarcón-Padilla, D. C., & Blanco, J. (2011b). Simulation and evaluation of the coupling of desalination units to parabolic-trough solar power plants in the Mediterranean region. Desalination, 281, 379–87.
Palenzuela, P., Hassan, A. S., Zaragoza, G., & Alarcón-Padilla, D. C. (2014). Steady state model for multi-effect distillation case study: Plataforma Solar de Almería MED pilot plant. Desalination, 337, 31–42.
Richter, C., Dersch, J. et al. (2009, September 15–18). Methods for reducing cooling water consumption in solar thermal power plants. In: Proceedings of the 15th SolarPACES Conference, Berlin, Germany.
Richter, C., & Dersch, J. (2010, June 29). Wasserverbrauch und Wassereinsparung bei solarthermischen Kraftwerken. Presentation at the DLR 13th solar conference, Cologne, Germany. DLR, Cologne
Short, W., Packey, D.J., & Holt, T. (1995). A manual for the economic evaluation of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies (NREL/TP-462-5173). Golden, Co: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Retrieved June 29, 2015, from http://www.nrel.gov/docs/legosti/old/5173.pdf
Taylor, B. N., & Kuyatt, C. E. (1994). Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results (Technical Note 1297). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Trieb, F., Kronshage, S., Quaschning, V., Dersch, J., Lerchenmüller, H., Morin, G., et al. (2004). SOKRATES-Projekt: Solarthermische Kraftwerkstechnologie für den Schutz des Erdklimas. Stuttgart, Germany: DLR.
Trieb, F. (2007). Concentrating solar power for seawater desalination (Aqua-CSP study report). Stuttgart, Germany: DLR (German Aerospace Center).
US DoE. (2009). Concentrating solar power commercial application study: Reducing water consumption of concentrating solar power electricity generation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.
Zarza, E. (1991). Solar thermal desalination project, first phase results and second phase description (1st ed.). Madrid, Spain: CIEMAT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Palenzuela, P., Alarcón-Padilla, DC., Zaragoza, G. (2015). Techno-economic Analysis. In: Concentrating Solar Power and Desalination Plants. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20535-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20535-9_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20534-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20535-9
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)