Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper focuses on the collaboration in an Israeli-Palestinian tech start-up company. We investigate the strategies enacted by the IT developers for managing the political dynamics and making collaboration possible under the highly challenging political conditions. We found that one of the key strategies was explicitly separating the work domain of software development from the domain of politics. We argue that the IT developers manage to collaborate by displacing the political conflict through strategies of non-confrontation instead of engaging in translating conflicting agendas against each other. By insisting on keeping politics outside of the workspace, the IT developers adopt a strategy of keeping the collaboration together by keeping politics and work apart. However, we found that despite the attempts to manage the sub-group dynamics, politics constantly invade the workspace and challenge the collaboration. Significant resources are invested into managing the regimes of differentiated identity cards, permits, and checkpoints, all of which have consequences on the employees’ freedom or restriction of mobility. Thus, we argue that the IT development domain is inseparable from and deeply dependent upon the political domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The interviews were conducted in July 2014, when the political situation was relatively calm as there were negotiations with Israel about releasing Palestinian prisoners and negotiations within Palestine for a unity government between Hamas and Fatah. A few days after the researcher left Ramallah, three settlers were kidnapped and this lead to a military crackdown on the West Bank and to an invasion on the Gaza Strip.

  2. 2.

    The names of all the informants are pseudonyms in order to preserve their anonymity.

  3. 3.

    http://www.pacbi.org/atemplate.php?id=100.

References

  • Aal, K., Yerousis, G., et al. (2014). Come_in@ Palestine: Adapting a german computer club concept to a Palestinian refugee camp. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Collaboration Across Boundaries: Culture, Distance and Technology (pp. 111–120).

    Google Scholar 

  • Associated Press (2009). Israeli-Palestinian partnership launches startup. http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3746717,00.html

  • B’Tselem. (2014). Qalandiya checkpoint, March 2014: An obstacle to normal life. http://www.btselem.org/photoblog/201404_qalandiya_checkpoint.

  • B’Tselem (2015). Checkpoint, physical obstructions, and forbidden roads. http://www.btselem.org/freedom_of_movement/checkpoints_and_forbidden_roads

  • Blomberg, J., and Karasti, H., (2013). Reflections on 25 years of ethnography in CSCW. Computer supported cooperative Work, 22(4–6), 373–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørn, P., & Ngwenyama, O. (2009). Virtual team collaboration: Building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence. Information Systems Journal, 19(3), 227–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørn, P., Esbensen, M., Jensen, R. E., Matthiesen, S. (2014). Does distance still matter? Revisiting the CSCW fundamentals on distributed collaboration. ACM Transaction Computer Human Interaction (ToChi), 21(5), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, A., Avram, G., et al. (2009). Knowledge management in distributed software development teams: Does culture matter? In International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE) (pp. 18–27). Limerick, Ireland: IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, A., Rosswog, F., et al. (2014). Articulation spaces: Bridging the gab between formal and informal coordination. In Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). Baltimore, USA: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H., & Brennan, S. (1991). Grounding in communication: Perspectives on social shared cognition. In L. Resnick, J. Levine & S. Teasley (Eds.), (xiii, 429 pp). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, C. D., & Hinds, P. (2005). Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocenterism or cross-national learning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 231–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, C. D., & Hinds, P. (2014). An embedded model of cultural adaptation in global teams. Organization Science, 25(4), 1056–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, G. (2013). In unoccupied Palestine: Keynote delivered at the ‘between dependence and independence: What future for Palestine?’ conference. Ramallah, Palestine: Ibrahim Abu-Lughod Institute of International Studies, Birzeit University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hass, A. (2002). Israels closure policy: An ineffective strategy of containment and repression. Journal of Palestine Studies, 31(3), 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. E., & Bjørn, P. (2012). Divergence and convergence in global software development: Cultural complexities as societal structures. COOP: Design of cooperative systems (pp. 123–136). France: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. E., & Nardi, B. (2014). The rhetoric of culture as an act of closure in cross-national software development department. European conference of information system (ECIS). Tel Aviv: AIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoury, G., & Khoury, M. (Eds.). (2014). Cases on management and organizational behaviour in an Arab context. USA: Business Science Reference IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review Anthropology, 24, 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthiesen, S., Bjørn, P., et al. (2014). Figure out how to code with the hands of others: Recognizing cultural blind spots in global software development. Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW). Baltimore, USA: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muna, F. A., & Khoury, G. (2012). The Palestinian executive: Leadership under challenging conditions. London: Gower Publishing, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2), 139–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J., & Olson, G. (2014). Working together apart: Collaboration over the internet. California, US: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilecki, A., & Hammack, P. (2014). Negotiating the past, imagining the future: Israeli and Palestinian narratives in intergroup dialog. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43, 100–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (1992). Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) An International Journal, 1(1–2), 7–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (1994). Do categories have politics? The language/action perspective reconsidered. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) An International Journal, 2(3), 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawil-Souri, H. (2011). Colored identity: The politics and materiality of ID cards in Palestine/Israel. Social Text, 29(2), 67–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tawil-Souri, H. (2012). Digital occupation: Gaza’s high-tech enclosure. Journal of Palestine Studies, 41(2), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson-Manheim, M. B., Chudoba, K., et al. (2002). Discontinuities and continuities: A new way to understand virtual work. Information Technology and People, 15(3), 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson-Manheim, M. B., Chudoba, K., et al. (2012). Perceived discontinuities and constructed continuities in virtual work. Information Systems Journal, 22(1), 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, V., Aal, K., et al. (2013). Fighting against the wall: Social media use by political activist in a Palestinian village. Human factors in computing systems CHI. Paris, France: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, D., Lake, M., et al. (2013). Envisioning across generations: A multi-lifespan information system for international justice in Rwanda. Human factors in computing systems CHI. Paris, France: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Palestinian developers from Alpha for welcoming us so warmly to Ramallah and for taking the time to kindly and generously share with us their honest reflections and critical experiences. This work was supported by The Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation: International Network Programme grant #4070-00010B.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Boulus-Rødje .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Boulus-Rødje, N., Bjørn, P., Ghazawneh, A. (2015). “It’s About Business not Politics”: Software Development Between Palestinians and Israelis. In: Boulus-Rødje, N., Ellingsen, G., Bratteteig, T., Aanestad, M., Bjørn, P. (eds) ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19-23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20499-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20499-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20498-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20499-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics