Skip to main content

Abstract

We have conducted a video study of households in Scotland with cohabiting students and young professionals. In this paper we unpack five examples of how mobile devices are used by people watching television. In the examples we explore how screens are used together (a) in a physical ecology, (b) in an embodied way, (c) in an orderly way, and (d) with respect to others. We point out that mobile devices are routinely used to access media that is unconnected and unrelated to media on television, for example for sending and receiving messages, browsing social media, and browsing websites. We suggest that mobile devices are not used to directly enhance television programmes, but to enhance leisure time. We suggest that it is important, when considering mobile devices as second screens, not just to treat these as a design topic, but to pay attention to how they are interactionally integrated into the living room.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barnham, S., & Harrison, S. (2013). Designing for collocated couples. In C. Neustaedter, S. Harrison, & A. Sellen (Eds.), Connecting families. The impact of new communication technologies on domestic life (pp. 15–36). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basapur, S. et al. (2012). FANFEEDS: Evaluation of socially generated information feed on second screen as a TV show companion. In Proceedings of EuroITV 2012, pp. 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhaupt, R. et al. (2008). Trends in the living room and beyond: Results from ethnographic studies using creative and playful probing. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 6(1), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., & Barkhuus, L. (2006). The television will be revolutionised: Effects of PVRs and filesharing on television watching. In Proceedings of ACM CHI ’06, pp. 663–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., McGregor, M., & Laurier, E. (2013). iPhone in Vivo: Video analysis of mobile device use. In Proceedings of ACM CHI ’13, pp. 1031–1040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesar, P., Bulterman, D., & Jansen, A. J. (2008). Usages of the secondary screen in an interactive television environment: Control, enrich, share, and transfer television content. EuroITV 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtois, C., & D’heer, E. (2012). Second screen applications and tablet users: Constellation, awareness, experience, and interest. EuroITV ’12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, A., Rouncefield, M., & Tolmie, P. (2012). Doing design ethnography. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, A., Tolmie, P. & Rouncefield M (2013). How many bloody examples do you want? Fieldwork and generalization. In Proceedings of ECSCW ’13, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Hemmings, T., & Benford, S. (2003). Finding a place for Ubicomp in the home. In Proceedings of Ubicomp ’03, pp. 208–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, L., Tsekleves, E., Whitham, R., Hill, A., & Kondo, K. (2007). Making Interactive TV easier to use: Interface design for a second screen approach. The Design Journal, 10(3), 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichner, S. (2014). Agency and media reception. Experiencing video games, film and television. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. E., Reeves, S., Moran, S., Greenhalgh, C., Benford, S., & Rennick-Egglestone, S. (2013). Understanding mobile notification management in collocated groups. In Proceedings of ECSCW ’13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geerts, D., Cesar, P., & Bulterman, D. (2008). The implications of program genres for the design of social television systems. ACM uxTV ’08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Car talk: Integrating texts, bodies, and changing landscapes. Semiotica 191(1/4), 257 – 286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Google. (2012). The new multiscreen world: Understanding cross-platform consumer behaviour. Think With Google Newsletter, August 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, R. (Ed.). (2011). The connected home: The future of domestic life. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, R. (2010). Texture: Human expression in the age of communication overload. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., Sanchez Svensson, M., Hindmarsh, J., Luff, P., & Vom, Lehn D. (2002). Configuring awareness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11(3–4), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, J., et al. (2011). Jumping between devices and services: Towards an integrated concept for social TV. In Proceedings of EuroITV ’11, pp. 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokela, T., Ojala, J., & Olsson, T. (2015). A diary study on combining multiple information devices in everyday activities and tasks. In Proceedings of CHI ’15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juhlin, O., & Önnevall, E. (2013). On the relation of ordinary gestures to TV screens. General lessons for the design of collaborative interactive techniques. In Proceedings of CHI ’13, pp. 919–930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction. Patterns of behaviour in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurier, E. (2014). The graphic transcript: Poaching comic book grammar for inscribing the visual, spatial and temporal aspects of action. Geography Compass, 8(4), 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurier, E., & Philo, C. (2006). Natural problems of naturalistic video data. In H. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H.-G. Soeffner, & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video-analysis methodology and methods, qualitative audiovisual data analysis in sociology (pp. 183–192). Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurier, E., & Wiggins, S. (2011). Finishing the family meal: The interactional organisation of satiety. Appetite, 56(1), 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, U., Lee, J., Ko, M., Lee, C., Kim, Y., Yang, S., Yatani, K., Gweon, G., Chung, K. M., & Song, J. (2014). Hooked on smartphones: An exploratory study of smartphone overuse among college students. In Proceedings of CHI 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley, B. et al. (2013). Impacts of new technologies on media usage and social behaviour in domestic environments. Behaviour and Information Technology, 33(8), 815–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, R., & Donner, J. (2009). Mobile communication. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2009). The methodical organization of talking and eating: Assessments in dinner conversations. Food and Quality Preference, 20(8), 558–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, M., Williamson, J., & Brewster, S. (2014a). How to lose friends and alienate people: Sharing control of a single use TV system. In Proceedings of TVX ’14, pp. 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, M., Williamson, J., Brewster, S. (2014b). Mirror, mirror, on the wall: Collaborative screen-mirroring for small groups. In Proceedings of TVX ’14, pp. 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neustaedter, C., Harrison, S., & Sellen, A. (2012). Connecting families: An Introduction. In C. Neustaedter, S. Harrison, & A. Sellen (Eds.), Connecting families. The impact of new communication technologies on domestic life (pp. 1–14). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen. (2014). Cross platform report, Q1 2014. http://www.nielsen.com/. Accessed February 2015.

  • O’Brien, J., Rodden, T., Rouncefield, M., & Hughes, J. (1999). At home with technology. An ethnographic study of a set-top box trial. Transactions on Human Computer Interaction (TOCHI), 6(3), 282–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogonowski, C., et al. (2013). Designing for the living room: Long-term user involvement in a living lab. In Proceedings of CHI ’13, pp. 1539–1548.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, K., Massimi, M., Harper, R., Rubens, S., & Morris, J. (2014). Everyday dwelling with WhatsApp. In Proceedings of CSCW ’14, pp. 1131–1143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooksby, J. (2013). Does professional work need to be studied in a natural setting? A secondary analysis of a laboratory study of software developers. In Petre, M. & van der Hoek, (Eds.). Software designers in action. A human centric look at design work. Chapman Hall: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. (1969). Sequence in conversational openings. American Anthropology, 70, 1075–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schirra, S., Huan, S., Bentley, F. (2014). Together alone: Motivations for live-tweeting a television series. In Proceedings of CHI ’14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. (2003). Comfort cleanliness and convenience: The social organisation of normality. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. (2007). The design of everyday life. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe, E. (2012). Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies, 14(3), 277–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolmie, P., Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., & Benford, S. (2008). Are you watching this or what? Interruption and the juggling of cohorts. In Proceedings of ACM CSCW ’08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolmie, P. (2013). Everyday intimacy. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolmie, P., Pycock, J., Diggins, T., MacLean, A., & Karsenty, A. (2002). Unremarkable computing. In Proceedings of CHI ’02, pp. 399–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together. Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by EPSRC award EP/J007617/1 A Population Approach to Ubicomp System Design. We thank the anonymous reviews, Eric Laurier at the University of Edinburgh, and our colleagues in the ‘Populations’ research programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Rooksby .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rooksby, J., Smith, T.E., Morrison, A., Rost, M., Chalmers, M. (2015). Configuring Attention in the Multiscreen Living Room. In: Boulus-Rødje, N., Ellingsen, G., Bratteteig, T., Aanestad, M., Bjørn, P. (eds) ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19-23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20499-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20499-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20498-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20499-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics