Advertisement

Fine-Grained Opinion, Probability, and the Logic of Full Belief

  • Bas C. van Fraassen
Part of the Springer Graduate Texts in Philosophy book series (SGTP, volume 1)

Abstract

Personal or subjective probability entered epistemology as a cure for certain perceived inadequacies in the traditional notion of belief. But there are severe strains in the relationship between probability and belief. They seem too intimately related to exist as separate but equal; yet if either is taken as the more basic, the other may suffer.

Keywords

Probability Measure Subjective Probability Belief Core Full Belief Lottery Paradox 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Birkhoff, G. (1967). Lattice theory (3rd ed.). Providence: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
  2. Blume, L., Brandenburger, A., & Deckel, E. (1991a). Lexicographic probabilities and choice under uncertainty. Econometrica, 59, 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blume, L., Brandenburger, A., & Deckel, E. (1991b). Lexicographic probabilities and equilibrium refinements. Econometrica, 59, 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Finetti, B. (1936). Les probabilités nulles. Bulletin des sciences mathématiques, 60, 275–288.Google Scholar
  5. De Finetti, B. (1972). Theory of probability (2 vols.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Field, H. (1977). Logic, meaning and conceptual role. Journal of Philosophy, 74, 374–409.Google Scholar
  7. Foley, R. (1993). Working without a net. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gardenfors, P. (1988). Knowledge in flux: Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hajek, A. (1992). The conditional construal of conditional probability. Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  10. Harper, W. L. (1976). Rational belief change, Popper functions, and counter-factuals. In C. Hooker, & W. Harper (Eds.), Foundations of probability theory (Vol. 1, pp. 73–112). Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  11. Kappos, D. A. (1969). Probability algebras and stochastic spaces. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Maher, P. (1990). Acceptance without belief. PSA, 1, 381–392.Google Scholar
  13. McGee, V. (1994). Learning the impossible, In Eells, E. & Skyrms, B. (Eds.). Probabilities and conditionals: Belief revision and rational decision (pp. 179–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Renyi, A. (1955). On a new axiomatic theory of probability. Acta Mathematica Hungarica, 6, 285–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Renyi, A. (1970a). Foundation of probability. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
  17. Renyi, A. (1970b). Probability theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  18. Skyrms, B. (1983). Three ways to give a probability function a memory. In J. Earman (Ed.), Testing scientific theories (Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. X, pp. 157–161). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. van Fraassen, B. C. (1979). Foundations of probability: A modal frequency interpretation. In G. Toraldo di Francia (Ed.), Problems in the foundations of physics (pp. 344–387). Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  20. van Fraassen, B. C. (1981a). Probabilistic semantics objectified: I. Postulates and logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 10, 371–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. van Fraassen, B. C. (1981b). Probabilistic semantics objectified: II. Implications in probabilistic model sets. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 10, 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. van Fraassen, B. C. (1988). Identity in intensional logic: Subjective semantics. In U. Eco et al. (Eds.), Meaning and mental representation (pp. 201–219). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Vickers, J. M. (1988). Chance and structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bas C. van Fraassen
    • 1
  1. 1.San Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations