Skip to main content

Managing Intracoronary Thrombus During PCI

  • Chapter
Controversies in Cardiology
  • 1060 Accesses

Abstract

Occlusive or nonocclusive thrombosis triggered by a disrupted or eroded atherosclerotic plaque is the anatomic substrate of most acute coronary syndromes including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (AMI). For this pathological substrate, macro- and microembolization during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of AMI is frequent and may result in obstruction of the microvessel network, and decreased efficacy of reperfusion and myocardial salvage. Thrombus may complicate other complex anatomic conditions associated with an altered flow such as ectatic or aneurysmatic coronary arteries, degenerated venous grafts, or coronary stents. Removal of thrombus before any other intervention may dramatically decrease the risk of no-flow, and has the potential for improvement in survival. Many types of thrombectomy removal or protection devices are currently available, from low technology catheters based on manual thrombus aspiration, including proximal or distal antiembolic protection devices, to high technology devices using mechanical energy allowing fragmentation and removal of thrombus. Studies on thrombectomy before stenting have produced conflicting results and there is no consensus as to their routine use in lesions containing thrombus. Other procedural approaches include specific covered and self-expandable stents for thrombus jailing, or deferred stenting after prolonged infusion of antithrombotic drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Topol EJ, Yadav JS. Recognition of the importance of embolization in atherosclerotic vascular disease. Circulation. 2000;101:570–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Migliorini A. Thrombectomy during percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: are the randomized trial data relevant to patients who really need this technique? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;71:863–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stone GW, Webb J, Cox DA, et al. Distal microcirculatory protection during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;293:1063–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Muramatsu T, Kozuma K, Tsukahara R, et al. Comparison of myocardial perfusion by distal protection before and after primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction: angiographic and clinical results of a randomized controlled trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;70:677–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gick M, Jander N, Bestehorn HP, et al. Randomized evaluation of the effects of filter-based distal protection on myocardial perfusion and infarct size after primary percutaneous catheter intervention in myocardial infarction with and without ST-segment elevation. Circulation. 2005;112:1462–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guetta V, Mosseri M, Shechter M, et al. Safety and efficacy of the FilterWire EZ in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:911–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cura FA, Escudero AG, Berrocal D, et al. Protection of distal embolization in high-risk patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (PREMIAR). Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:357–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Baim DS, Wahr D, George B, et al. Randomized trial of a distal embolic protection device during percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts. Circulation. 2002;105:1285–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stone GW, Rogers C, Hermiller J, et al. Randomized comparison of distal protection with a filter-based catheter and a balloon occlusion and aspiration system during percutaneous intervention of diseased saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts. Circulation. 2003;108:548–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grube E, Schofer J, Webb J, For the Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty Free of Emboli (SAFE), et al. Evaluation of a balloon occlusion and aspiration system for protection from distal embolization during stenting in saphenous vein grafts. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:941–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burzotta F, Trani C, Romagnoli E, et al. Manual thrombus-aspiration improves myocardial reperfusion: the randomized evaluation of the effect of mechanical reduction of distal embolization by thrombus-aspiration in primary and rescue angioplasty (REMEDIA) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:371–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Silva-Orrego P, Colombo P, Bigi R, et al. Thrombus aspiration before primary angioplasty improves myocardial reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: the DEAR-MI (Dethrombosis to Enhance Acute Reperfusion in Myocardial Infarction) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1552–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Luca L, Sardella G, Davidson CJ, et al. Impact of intracoronary aspiration thrombectomy during primary angioplasty on left ventricular remodelling in patients with anterior ST elevation myocardial infarction. Heart. 2006;92:951–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaltoft A, Bøttcher M, Nielsen SS, et al. Routine thrombectomy in percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized, controlled trial. Circulation. 2006;114:40–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Svilaas T, Vlaar PJ, van der Horst IC, et al. Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous intervention. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:557–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vlaar PJ, Svilaas T, van der Horst IC, et al. Cardiac death and reinfarction after 1 year in the Thrombus Aspiration during Percutaneous coronary intervention in Acute myocardial infarction Study (TAPAS): a 1-year follow-up study. Lancet. 2008;371:1915–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sardella G, Mancone M, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, et al. Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention improves myocardial reperfusion and reduces infarct size: the EXPIRA (thrombectomy with Export catheter in Infarct-Related Artery during primary percutaneous coronary intervention) prospective randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:309–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fröbert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, et al. Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1587–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lagerqvist B, Fröbert O, Olivecrona GK, et al. Outcomes 1 year after thrombus aspiration for myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1111–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rinfret S, Katsiyiammis PT, Ho KK, et al. Effectiveness of rheolytic coronary thrombectomy with the AngioJet catheter. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:470–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuntz RE, Baim DS, Cohen DJ, et al. A trial comparing rheolytic thrombectomy wiyth intracoronary urokinase for coronary and vein graft thrombus (the Vein Graft Angiojet Study [VeGAS 2]). Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:326–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Migliorini A, et al. Comparison of rheolytic thrombectomy before direct infarct artery stenting versus direct stenting alone in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:1033–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ali A, Cox D, Dib N, et al. Rheolytic thrombectomy with percutaneous coronary intervention for infarct size reduction in acute myocardial infarction: 30-day results from a multicenter randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:244–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Migliorini A, Stabile A, Rodriguez AE, et al. Comparison of AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy before direct infarct artery stenting with direct stenting alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The JETSTENT Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1298–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Parodi G, Valenti R, Migliorini A, et al. Comparison of manual thrombus aspiration with rheolytic thrombectomy in acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:224–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van Geuns RJ, Tamburino C, Fajadet J, et al. Self-expanding versus balloon-expandable stents in acute myocardial infarction: results from the APPOSITION II study: self-expanding stents in ST- segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:1209–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Koch Kt Stellbrink C, Le Heuzey JY, et al. One year clinical autcomes of the STENTYS Self - Apposing coronary stent in patients presenting with ST elevation myocardial infartions: results from the APPOSITION III registry Eurointervention. 2015;11(3):264–71.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stone GW, Abizaid A, Silber S, et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter evaluation of a polyethylene terephthalate micronet mesh–covered stent (MGuard) in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction The MASTER Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1975–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Carrick D, Oldroyd KG, McEntegart M, et al. A randomized trial of deferred stenting versus immediate stenting to prevent no- or slow-reflow in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DEFER-STEMI). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2088–98.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Antoniucci MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Antoniucci, D. (2015). Managing Intracoronary Thrombus During PCI. In: Ambrose, J., Rodríguez, A. (eds) Controversies in Cardiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20415-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20415-4_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20414-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20415-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics