3D Spatial Correlation Tensor from an L-Shaped SPIV Experiment in the Near Wall Region

  • Jean-Marc FoucautEmail author
  • Christophe Cuvier
  • Sebastien Coudert
  • Michel Stanislas
Conference paper
Part of the ERCOFTAC Series book series (ERCO, volume 23)


Understanding the turbulence organization near a wall is necessary to help improving turbulence models. From the experimental point of view, many researchers have worked on this subject since the fifties. Recently, Foucaut et al. (Exp. Fluids 50(4, Sp. Iss. SI):839–846, 2011) [16] have proposed a new idea to compute the 3D correlation tensor from two normal velocity fields when there are two homogeneous directions in the flow. The idea of the present contribution is to propose a specific SPIV experiment which allows the computation of the full 3D spatial correlation tensor in the near wall region of the TBL. This experiment composed of two Stereoscopic PIV planes normal to the wall which were simultaneously recorded was performed in the LML wind tunnel. The 3D correlation is then computed from the two velocity planes in order to give some information about the near wall turbulence organization. Conditioning the average by specific events allows us to improve the analysis of the organisation. It can evidence the link between the events.


Turbulent Boundary Layer Wall Distance Wall Unit Correlation Tensor Interrogation Window Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The work was supported through the International Campus on Safety and Inter modality in Transportation (CISIT). S. Coudert is acknowledged for the participation in the experiment.


  1. 1.
    E.R. Corino, R.S. Brodkey, A visual investigation of the wall region in turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 37, 1–30 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.J. Adrian, C.D. Meinhart, C.D. Tomkins, Vortex organization in the outer layer of the turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 422, 1–54 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.J. Kahler, Investigation of the spatio-temporal flow structure in the buffer region of a turbulent boundary layer by means of multiplane stereo PIV. Exp. Fluids 36, 114–130 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H.T. Kim, S.J. Kline, W.C. Reynolds, The production of turbulence near a smooth wall in a turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 50, 133–160 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Tutkun, W.K. George, J. Delville, M. Stanislas, P.B.V. Johansson, J.M. Foucaut, S. Coudert, Two-point correlations in high Reynolds number flat plate turbulent boundary layers. J. Turbul. 10(21), 1–23 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Stanislas, J. Carlier, J.M. Foucaut, P. Dupont, Double spatial correlations, a new experimental insight in wall turbulence. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris II B 327, 55–61 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Favre, J. Faviglio, R. Dumas, Space-time double correlations and spectra in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 2, 313–342 (1957)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Favre, J. Faviglio, R. Dumas, Further space-time correlations of velocity in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 3, 344–356 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Willert, Stereoscopic digital particle image velocimetry for applications in wind tunnel flows. Meas. Sci. Technol. 8, 1465–1479 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Soloff, R. Adrian, Z.C. Liu, Distortion compensation for generalized stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol. 8, 1441–1454 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Stanislas, L. Perret, J.M. Foucaut, Vortical structures in the turbulent boundary layer: a possible route to a universal representation. J. Fluid Mech. 602, 327–382 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. J. Kahler and M. Stanislas. Investigation of wall bounded flows by means of multiple plane stereo PIV, in Proceeding of 10th International Symposium on Application of Laser Technology to Fluid Mechanics, Lisbon (2000) (to appear)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Ganapathisubramani, N. Hutchins, W.T. Hambleton, E.K. Longmire, I. Marusic, Investigation of large-scale coherence in a turbulent boundary layer using two-point correlations. J. Fluid Mech. 524, 57–80 (2005)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    W.T. Hambleton, N. Hutchins, I. Marusic, Simultaneous orthogonal plane particle image velocimetry measurements in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 560, 53–64 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. Ganapathisubramani, E.K. Longmire, I. Marusic, Experimental investigation of vortex properties in a turbulent boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 18(055105), 1–14 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.-M. Foucaut, S. Coudert, M. Stanislas, J. Delville, Full 3d correlation tensor computed from double field stereoscopic PIV in a high Reynolds number turbulent boundary layer. Exp. Fluids 50(4, Sp. Iss. SI), 839–846 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R.J. Adrian, Dynamic ranges of velocity and spatial resolution of particle image velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol. 8(12), 1393–1398 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Raffel, C. Willert, J. Kompenhans, Particle Image Velocimetry (Springer, Berlin, 1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    F. Scarano, Iterative image deformation methods in PIV. Meas. Sci. Technol. 13(1), R1–R19 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Stanislas, K. Okamoto, C.J. Kahler, J. Westerweel, F. Scarano, Main results of the third international PIV challenge. Exp. Fluids 45(1), 27–71 (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. Coudert, J.P. Schon, Back projection algorithm with misalignment corrections for 2D3C Stereoscopic PIV. Meas. Sci. Technol. 12, 1371–1381 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    B. Wieneke, Stereo-PIV using self-calibration on particle images. Exp. Fluids 39(2), 267–280 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J.M. Foucaut, J. Carlier, M. Stanislas, PIV optimization for the study of turbulent flow using spectral analysis. Meas. Sci. Technol. 15, 1046–1058 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J.M. Foucaut, S. Coudert, C. Braud, C.M. Velte, Influence of light sheet separation on SPIV measurement in a large field spanwise plane. Meas. Sci. Technol. 25(035304), 1–10 (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    C. Atkinson, S. Coudert, J.M. Foucaut, M. Stanislas, J. Soria, The accuracy of tomographic particle image velocimetry for measurements of a turbulent boundary layer. Exp. Fluids 50(4, Sp. Iss. SI), 1031–1056 (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. Lin, J.-P. Laval, J.-M. Foucaut, M. Stanislas, Quantitative characterization of coherent structures in the buffer layer of near-wall turbulence. Part 1: streaks. Exp. Fluids 45(6), 999–1013 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    W. Schoppa, F. Hussain, Coherent structure dynamics in near-wall turbulence. Fluid Dyn. Res. 26(2), 119–139 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Marc Foucaut
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christophe Cuvier
    • 1
  • Sebastien Coudert
    • 2
  • Michel Stanislas
    • 1
  1. 1.Ecole Centrale de Lille, Laboratoire de Mécanique de Lille(LML)UMR8107 CNRSVilleneuve d’ascqFrance
  2. 2.Physico-Chimie des Processus de Combustion et de l’Atmosphère (PC2A), UMR 8522 CNRS/Lille 1Université Lille 1 Sciences et TechnologiesVilleneuve d’ascq CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations