Advertisement

On Minimum Aspect Ratio for Experimental Duct Flow Facilities

  • Ricardo Vinuesa
  • Eduard Bartrons
  • Daniel Chiu
  • Jean-Daniel Rüedi
  • Philipp Schlatter
  • Aleksandr Obabko
  • Hassan M. NagibEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the ERCOFTAC Series book series (ERCO, volume 23)

Abstract

To the surprise of some of our colleagues, we recently recommended aspect ratios of at least 24 (instead of accepted values over last few decades ranging from 5 to 12) to minimize effects of sidewalls in turbulent duct flow experiments, in order to approximate the two-dimensional channel flow. Here we compile available results from hydraulics and civil engineering literature, where this was already documented in the 1980s. This is of great importance due to the large amount of computational studies (mainly Direct Numerical Simulations) for spanwise-periodic turbulent channel flows, and the extreme complexity of constructing a fully developed duct flow facility with aspect ratio of 24 for high Reynolds number with adequate probe resolution. Results from this nontraditional literature for the turbulence community are compared to our recent database of DNS of turbulent duct flows with aspect ratios ranging from 1 to 18 and \(Re_{\tau ,c} \simeq 180\) and 330, leading to very good agreement between their experimental and our computational results.

Keywords

Aspect Ratio Wall Shear Stress Direct Numerical Simulation Secondary Vortex Turbulent Channel Flow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Jiménez, Cascades in wall-bounded turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44, 27–45 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Vinuesa, E. Bartrons, D. Chiu, K.M. Dressler, J.-D. Rüedi, Y. Suzuki, H.M. Nagib, New insight into flow development and two dimensionality of turbulent channel flows. Exp. Fluids (2014) (In press)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Vinuesa, A. Noorani, A. Lozano-Durán, G.K. El Khoury, P. Schlatter, P.F. Fischer, H.M. Nagib, Aspect ratio effects in turbulent duct flows studied through direct numerical simulation. J. Turbul. (2014) (In press)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Bradshaw, G.E. Hellens, The N.P.L. 59 in \(\times \) 9 in boundary layer tunnel. NPL Aero Report 1119 (1964)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.B. Dean, Reynolds number dependence of skin friction and other bulk flow variables in two dimensional rectangular duct flow. Phys. Fluids 100, 215–223 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E.-S. Zanoun, F. Durst, H.M. Nagib, Evaluating the law of the wall in two-dimensional fully developed turbulent channel flows. Phys. Fluids 15, 3079–3089 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.P. Monty, Developments in smooth wall turbulent duct flows. Ph.D. thesis, University of Melbourne (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D.W. Knight, H.S. Patel, Boundary shear in smooth rectangular ducts. J. Hydraul. Eng. 111, 29–47 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D.G. Rhodes, D.W. Knight, Distribution of shear force on boundary of smooth rectangular duct. J. Hydraul. Eng. 120, 787–807 (1994)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Yang, Mechanisms for initiating secondary currents in channel flows. J. Civ. Eng. 36, 1506–1516 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N.E. Kotsovinos, Secondary currents in straight wide channels. Appl. Math. Model. 12, 22–24 (1988)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P.F. Fischer, J.W. Lottes, S.G. Kerkemeier, NEK5000: open source spectral element CFD solver (2008). http://nek5000.mcs.anl.gov

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo Vinuesa
    • 1
    • 3
  • Eduard Bartrons
    • 1
  • Daniel Chiu
    • 1
  • Jean-Daniel Rüedi
    • 2
  • Philipp Schlatter
    • 3
  • Aleksandr Obabko
    • 4
  • Hassan M. Nagib
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.MMAE DepartmentIllinois Institute of TechnologyChicagoUSA
  2. 2.II Facoltà di IngegneriaUniversità di BolognaForlíItaly
  3. 3.Linné FLOW CentreKTH MechanicsStockholmSweden
  4. 4.MCSArgonne National LaboratoryArgonneUSA

Personalised recommendations