Advertisement

Cloud-Based Video Monitoring Framework: An Approach Based on Software-Defined Networking for Addressing Scalability Problems

Conference paper
  • 710 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9051)

Abstract

Closed-circuit television (CCTV) and Internet protocol (IP) cameras have been applied to a surveillance or monitoring system, from which users can remotely monitor video streams. The system has been employed for many applications such as home surveillance, traffic monitoring, and crime prevention. Currently, cloud computing has been integrated with the video monitoring system for achieving value-added services such as video adjustment, encoding, image/video recognition, and backup services. One of the challenges in this integration is due to the size and geographical scalability problems when video streams are transferred to and retrieved from the cloud services by numerous cameras and users, respectively. Unreliable network connectivity is a major factor that causes the problems. To deal with the scalability problems, this paper proposes a framework designed for a cloud-based video monitoring (CVM) system. In particular, this framework applies two major approaches, namely stream aggregation (SA) and software-defined networking (SDN). The SA approach can reduce the network latency between cameras and cloud services. The SDN approach can achieve the adaptive routing control which improves the network performance. With the SA and SDN approaches applied by the framework, the total latency for transferring video streams can be minimized and the scalability of the CVM system can be significantly enhanced.

Keywords

Cloud computing Video monitoring Video surveillance Software-defined networking 

References

  1. 1.
    Williams, C.A.: Police surveillance and the emergence of CCTV in the 1960s. Crime Prev. Community Saf. 5(3), 27–37 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hildebrandt, P.: Dash-Cams keep record: recording officers’ interactions with the public with mobile video isn’t enough, SOPs must clarify how video is captured and stored. Law Enforcement Technol. 36(2), 10–14 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kurze, M., Roselius, A.: Smart glasses linking real live and social network’s contacts by face recognition. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Augmented Human International Conference, p. 31. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hossain, M.S., Hassan, M.M., Qurishi, M.A., Alghamdi, A.: Resource allocation for service composition in cloud-based video surveillance platform. In: IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops (ICMEW), pp. 408–412 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Satyanarayanan, M., Bahl, P., Caceres, R., Davies, N.: The case for vm-based cloudlets in mobile computing. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 8(4), 14–23 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xia, W., Wen, Y., Foh, C.H., Niyato, D., Xie, H.: A survey on software-defined networking. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin, C.F., Yuan, S.M., Leu, M.C., Tsai, C.T.: A framework for scalable cloud video recorder system in surveillance environment. In: 2012 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing and 9th International Conference on Autonomic & Trusted Computing (UIC/ATC), pp. 655–660 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saini, M.K., Atrey, P.K., Saddik, A.E.: From smart camera to SmartHub: embracing cloud for video surveillance. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen, W., Cao, J., Wan, Y.: QoS-aware virtual machine scheduling for video streaming services in multi-cloud. Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 18(3), 308–317 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang, Z., Mei, C., Li, L., Woo, T.: CloudStream: Delivering high-quality streaming videos through a cloud-based SVC proxy. In: 2011 Proceedings IEEEINFOCOM, pp. 201–205 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu, G., Talwar, S., Johnsson, K., Himayat, N., Johnson, K.D.: M2M: From mobile to embedded internet. IEEE Commun. Mag. 49(4), 36–43 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kamilova, M.I., Hesselman, C., Widya, I., Huizer, E.: Adding policy-based control to mobile hosts switching between streaming proxies. In: Sixth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, pp. 243–246 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Egilmez, H.E., Dane, S.T., Bagci, K.T., Tekalp, A.M.: Koc University Istanbul, Turkey. In: 2012 Asia-Pacific Signal & Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kurose, J.F., Ross, K.W.: Computer Networking: a Top-Down Approach, 6th edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sotomayor, B., Montero, R.S., Llorente, I.M., Foster, I.: Virtual infrastructure management in private and hybrid clouds. IEEE Internet Comput. 13(5), 14–22 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chaisiri, S., Lee, B.S., Niyato, D.: Optimization of resource provisioning cost in cloud computing. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 5(2), 164–177 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aceto, G., Botta, A., De Donato, W., Pescapè, A.: Cloud monitoring: A survey. Comput. Netw. 57(9), 2093–2115 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dasu, A., Panchanathan, S.: A survey of media processing approaches. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 12(8), 633–645 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Connolly, J.F., Granger, E., Sabourin, R.: An adaptive classification system for video-based face recognition. Inf. Sci. 192, 50–70 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Burghardt, T., Ćalić, J.: Analysing animal behaviour in wildlife videos using face detection and tracking. IEE Proc.-Vis., Image and Sig. Proc. 153(3), 305–312 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Du, S., Ibrahim, M., Shehata, M., Badawy, W.: Automatic license plate recognition (ALPR): a state-of-the-art review. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 23(2), 311–325 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lai, C.L., Yang, J.C., Chen, Y.,H.: A real time video processing based surveillance system for early fire and flood detection. In: Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings, IMTC 2007, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Regazzoni, C.S., Cavallaro, A., Wu, Y., Konrad, J., Hampapur, A.: Video analytics for surveillance: Theory and practice [from the guest editors]. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 27(5), 16–17 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Saligrama, V., Konrad, J., Jodoin, P.M.: Video anomaly identification. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 27(5), 18–33 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shan, C., Porikli, F., Xiang, T., Gong, S. (eds.): Video Analytics for Business Intelligence. SCI, vol. 409, pp. 309–354. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ardizzone, E., La Cascia, M.: Automatic video database indexing and retrieval. Multimedia Tools Appl. 4(1), 29–56 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chase, J., Kaewpuang, R., Wen, Y., Niyato, D.: Joint virtual machine and bandwidth allocation in software defined network (SDN) and cloud computing environments. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICC, Sydney, Australia (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information TechnologyShinawatra UniversityChiang MaiThailand
  2. 2.Department of ComputingUnitec Institute of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations