Advancing Typology of Computer-Supported Influence: Moderation Effects in Socially Influencing Systems

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9072)

Abstract

Persuasive technologies are commonly engineered to change behavior and attitudes of users through persuasion and social influence without using coercion and deception. While earlier research has been extensively focused on exploring the concept of persuasion, the present theory-refining study aims to explain the role of social influence and its distinctive characteristics in the field of persuasive technology. Based on a list of notable differences, this study outlines how both persuasion and social influence can be best supported through computing systems and introduces a notion of computer-moderated influence, thus extending the influence typology. The novel type of influence tends to be more salient for socially influencing systems, which informs designers to be mindful when engineering such technologies. The study provides sharper conceptual representation of key terms in persuasive engineering, drafts a structured approach for better understanding of the influence typology, and presents how computers can be moderators of social influence.

Keywords

Influence typology Computer-moderated Persuasive technology Computer-mediated Computer-human Socially influencing systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Angst, C.M., Agarwal, R.: Adoption of Electronic Health Records in the Presence of Privacy Concerns: the Elaboration Likelihood Model and Individual Persuasion. MIS Quarterly 33(2), 339–370 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A.: The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6), 1173 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cialdini, R.B.: Influence: The Science of Persuasion. HarperCollins Publishers Inc., New York (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cialdini, R.B., Goldstein, N.J.: Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 591–621 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cialdini, R.B., Kallgren, C.A., Reno, R.R.: A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24(20), 1–243 (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deutsch, M., Gerard, H.B.: A Study of Normative and Informational Social Influences upon Individual Judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51(3), 629 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Di Blasio, P., Milani, L.: Computer-Mediated Communication and Persuasion: Peripheral vs. Central Route to Opinion Shift. Computers in Human Behavior 24(3), 798–815 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eagly, A.H., Chaiken, S.: The Psychology of Attitudes. Harcourt, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers To Change What We Think And Do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gass, R.H., Seiter, J.S.: Persuasion: Social Influence, and Compliance Gaining, 5th edn. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon, Boston (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guadagno, R.E., Ewell, P.J., Cialdini, R.B.: Influence. In: Cooper, C.L. (ed.) Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, pp. 3–5. John Wiley & Sons (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guadagno, R.E., Muscanell, N.L., Rice, L.M., Roberts, N.: Social Influence Online: The Impact of Social Validation and Likability on Compliance. Psychology of Popular Media Culture 2(1), 51 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harjumaa, M., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Persuasion Theories and IT Design. In: de Kort, Y.A.W., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 311–314. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haslam, S.A., McGarty, C., Turner, J.C.: Salient Group Memberships and Persuasion: The Role of Social Identity in the Validation of Beliefs (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hong, S., Park, H.S.: Computer-Mediated Persuasion in Online Reviews: Statistical Versus Narrative Evidence. Computers in Human Behavior 28(3), 906–919 (2012)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hovland, C.I., Janis, I.L., Kelley, H.H.: Communication and Persuasion. Psychological Studies of Opinion Change (1953)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., McGuire, T.W.: Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication. American Psychologist 39(10), 1123 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lewin, K.: Group Decision and Social Change. In: Newcomb, T.M., Hartley, E.L. (eds.) Readings in Social Psychology, pp. 330–344. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, NY (1947)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Eccles, M.P., Cane, J., Wood, C.E.: The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 46(1), 81–95 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    O’Keefe, B.J., Shepherd, G.J.: The Pursuit of Multiple Objectives in Face-to-Face Persuasive Interactions: Effects of Construct Differentiation on Message Organization. Communications Monographs 54(4), 396–419 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    O’Keefe, D.J.: Persuasion: Theory and Research. Sage, Newbury (1990)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19, 123–205 (1986)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rashotte, L.: Social influence. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Psychology 9, 562–563 (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sassenberg, K., Boos, M., Rabung, S.: Attitude Change in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communication: Private Self-Awareness as Mediator and Moderator. European Journal of Social Psychology 35(3), 361–374 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sassenberg, K., Ionas, K.I.: Attitude Change and Social Influence. In: Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology, 273 (2007)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Short, J.A., Williams, E., Christie, B.: The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley, London (1976)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smith, J.R., Louis, W.R., Schultz, P.W.: Introduction Social influence in action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 14(5), 599–603 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stibe, A.: Socially Influencing Systems: Persuading People to Engage with Publicly Displayed Twitter-based Systems. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis (2014)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stibe, A.: Towards a Framework for Socially Influencing Systems: Meta-Analysis of Four PLS-SEM Based Studies. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) Persuasive Technology. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 171–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wilson, E.V.: Perceived Effectiveness of Interpersonal Persuasion Strategies in Computer-Mediated Communication. Computers in Human Behavior 19(5), 537–552 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wood, W.: Attitude Change: Persuasion and Social Influence. Annual Review of Psychology 51(1), 539–570 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zajonc, R.B.: Social facilitation. Science 149, 269–274 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zimbardo, P.G., Leippe, M.R.: The Psychology of Attitude Change and Social Influence. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company (1991)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MIT Media LabCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations