Abstract
In this study, we investigate whether cognitive conflicts induced by curiosity-triggering events have a positive impact on learning and motivation. In two experiments, we tested a game about proportional reasoning for secondary prevocational students. Experiment 1 used a curiosity-triggering vs. control condition pretest–posttest design. The control condition received the game without curiosity-triggering events. The results provided evidence that the game improves proportional reasoning skills. Although game performance was positively related to posttest performance, the hypothesized higher increase in learning and motivation after curiosity-triggering events was not found. Based on the results of Experiment 1, the game was adapted. Experiment 2 showed basically the same pattern of results, but we did not find a learning effect after playing the game. In the Discussion, we suggest additional research with think-aloud and/or eye-tracking to map the actual thoughts after the curiosity-triggering events. In addition, we propose some alternative implementations to evoke cognitive conflicts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York, NY: WH Freeman.
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal and curiosity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Cameron, B., & Dwyer, F. (2005). The effect of online gaming, cognition and feedback type in facilitating delayed achievement of different learning objectives. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16, 243–258.
de Castell, S., & Jenson, J. (2003). Serious play. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, 649–665.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.
Dickey, M. D. (2011). Murder on Grimm Isle: The impact of game narrative design in an educational game-based learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 456–469.
Girard, C., Ecalle, J., & Magnan, A. (2013). Serious games as new educational tools: How effective are they? A meta‐analysis of recent studies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 207–219.
Graesser, A. C., & McMahen, C. L. (1993). Anomalous information triggers questions when adults solve quantitative problems and comprehend stories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 136–151.
Graesser, A. C., & Olde, B. (2003). How does one know whether a person understands a device? The quality of the questions the person asks when the device breaks down. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 524–536.
Jirout, J., & Klahr, D. (2012). Children’s scientific curiosity: In search of an operational definition of an elusive concept. Developmental Review, 32(2), 125–160.
Leemkuil, H., & de Jong, T. (2011). Instructional support in games. In S. Tobias & D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 353–369). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Limón, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11(4), 357–380.
Litman, J. A. (2005). Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and linking new information. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 793–814.
Litman, J. A., Hutchins, T. L., & Russon, R. K. (2005). Epistemic curiosity, feeling-of-knowing, and exploratory behavior. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 559–582.
Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 75–98.
Malone, T. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 4, 333–369.
Mayer, R. E. (2011). Multimedia learning and games. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 281–305). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Merenluoto, K., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Number concept and conceptual change: Towards a systemic model of the processes of change. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 519–534.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2005). Role of guidance, reflection, and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 117–128.
Rick, J., Bejan, A., Roche, C., & Weinberger, A. (2012). Proportion: Learning proportional reasoning together. In A. Ravenscroft, S. Lindstaedt, C. D. Kloos, D. Hernández-Leo (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 7563. 21st century learning for 21st century skills (pp. 513–518). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450–461.
Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 347–363.
Sitzmann, T. (2011). A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64, 489–528.
Tobias, S., Fletcher, J. D., Dai, D. Y., & Wind, A. P. (2011). Review of research on computer games. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 127–222). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Tourniaire, F., & Pulos, S. (1985). Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16, 181–204.
Vandercruysse, S., terVrugte, J., de Jong, T., Wouters, P., van Oostendorp, H., & Elen, J. (2015). “Zeldenrust”: A mathematical game-based learning environment for vocational students.
Wouters, P., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. M. (2008). How to optimize learning from animated models: A review of guidelines base on cognitive load. Review of Educational Research, 78, 645–675.
Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & van der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 249–265.
Wouters, P., & Van Oostendorp, H. (2013). A meta-analytic review of the role of instructional support in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 60(1), 412–425.
Wouters, P., van Oostendorp, H., Boonekamp, R., & van der Spek, E. D. (2011). The role of Game Discourse Analysis and curiosity in creating engaging and effective serious games by implementing a back story and foreshadowing. Interacting with Computers, 23, 329–336.
Acknowledgment
This research is funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (project Number No. 411-00-003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wouters, P., van Oostendorp, H., ter Vrugte, J., Vandercruysse, S., de Jong, T., Elen, J. (2015). The Role of Curiosity-Triggering Events in Game-Based Learning for Mathematics. In: Torbeyns, J., Lehtinen, E., Elen, J. (eds) Describing and Studying Domain-Specific Serious Games. Advances in Game-Based Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20276-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20276-1_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20275-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20276-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)