International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization

UMAP 2015: User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization pp 364-369 | Cite as

Personality Correlates for Digital Concert Program Notes

  • Marko Tkalčič
  • Bruce Ferwerda
  • David Hauger
  • Markus Schedl
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9146)

Abstract

In classical music concerts, the concert program notes are distributed to the audience in order to provide background information on the composer, piece and performer. So far, these have been printed documents composed mostly of text. With some delay, mobile devices are making their way also in the world of classical concerts, hence offering additional options for digital program notes comprising not only text but also images, video and audio. Furthermore, these digital program notes can be personalized. In this paper, we present the results of a user study that relates personal characteristics (personality and background musical knowledge) to preferences for digital program notes.

Keywords

Classical music Digital program notes Personality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cantador, I., Fernández-Tobías, I., Bellogín, A.: Relating personality types with user preferences in multiple entertainment domains. In: EMPIRE 1st Workshop on Emotions and Personality in Personalized Services, June 10, 2013, Rome (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A.: Personality and music: can traits explain how people use music in everyday life? British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953) 98(Pt 2), 175–185 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    El-Bishouty, M.M., Chang, T.-W., Graf, S., Chen, N.-S.: Smart e-course recommender based on learning styles. Journal of Computers in Education 1(1), 99–111 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elahi, M., Braunhofer, M., Ricci, F., Tkalcic, M.: Personality-based active learning for collaborative filtering recommender systems. In: Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Boella, G., Micalizio, R. (eds.) AI*IA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8249, pp. 360–371. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ferwerda, B., Yang, E., Schedl, M., Tkalčič, M.: Personality traits predict music taxonomy preference. In: CHI 2015 Works-in-Progress (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Furnham, A.: The big five versus the big four: the relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences 21(2), 303–307 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Golbeck, J., Robles, C., Edmondson, M., Turner, K.: Predicting personality from twitter. In: 2011 SocialCom and PASSAT Conference Proceedings, pp. 149–156. IEEE, October 2011Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., Swann, W.B.: A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality 37(6), 504–528 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    John, O.P., Srivastava, S.: The big five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin, L.A., John, O.P. (eds.) Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, vol. 2, 2nd edn, pp. 102–138. Guilford Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., Graepel, T.: Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, pp. 2–5, March 2013Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liem, C.S.S., Van Der Sterren, R.: Innovating the classical music experience in the PHENICX project : use cases and initial user feedback. In: 1st International Workshop on Interactive Content Consumption (WSICC) at EuroITV 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Müllensiefen, D., Gingras, B., Musil, J., Stewart, L.: The musicality of non-musicians: an index for assessing musical sophistication in the general population. PloS One 9(2), e89642 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Quercia, D., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., Crowcroft, J.: Our twitter profiles, our selves: predicting personality with twitter. In: 2011 SocialCom and PASSAT Conference Proceedings, pp. 180–185. IEEE, October 2011Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rentfrow, P.J., Gosling, S.D.: The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84(6), 1236–1256 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tkalcic, M., Kunaver, M., Košir, A., Tasic, J.: Addressing the new user problem with a personality based user similarity measure. In: Proceedings of the DEMRA 2011 and the UMMS 2011 Workshops, Girona, Spain (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marko Tkalčič
    • 1
  • Bruce Ferwerda
    • 1
  • David Hauger
    • 1
  • Markus Schedl
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computational PerceptionJohannes Kepler UniversityLinzAustria

Personalised recommendations