The Mars and Venus Effect: The Influence of User Gender on the Effectiveness of Adaptive Task Support
Providing adaptive support to users engaged in learning tasks is the central focus of intelligent tutoring systems. There is evidence that female and male users may benefit differently from adaptive support, yet it is not understood how to most effectively adapt task support to gender. This paper reports on a study with four versions of an intelligent tutoring system for introductory computer programming offering different levels of cognitive (conceptual and problem-solving) and affective (motivational and engagement) support. The results show that female users reported significantly more engagement and less frustration with the affective support system than with other versions. In a human tutorial dialogue condition used for comparison, a consistent difference was observed between females and males. These results suggest the presence of the Mars and Venus Effect, a systematic difference in how female and male users benefit from cognitive and affective adaptive support. The findings point toward design principles to guide the development of gender-adaptive intelligent tutoring systems.
KeywordsGender effects Adaptive support Intelligent tutoring systems Affect Engagement Frustration
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Arroyo, I., Woolf, B.P., Cooper, D.G., Burleson, W., Muldner, K.: The impact of animated pedagogical agents on girls’ and boys’ emotions, attitudes, behaviors and learning. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 506–510. IEEE, Athens (2011)Google Scholar
- 3.Baker, R.S.J., D’Mello, S.K., Rodrigo, M.T., Graesser, A.C.: Better to Be Frustrated Than Bored: The Incidence, Persistence, and Impact of Learners’ Cognitive-affective States During Interactions with Three Different Computer-based Learning Environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68(4), 223–241 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Belk, M., Germanakos, P., Fidas, C., Samaras, G.: A personalization method based on human factors for improving usability of user authentication tasks. In: Dimitrova, V., Kuflik, T., Chin, D., Ricci, F., Dolog, P., Houben, G.-J. (eds.) UMAP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8538, pp. 13–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
- 9.Boyer, K.E., Vouk, M.A., Lester, J.C.: The influence of learner characteristics on task-oriented tutorial dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 365–372. IOS Press, Marina Del Rey (2007)Google Scholar
- 12.Cohen, P.R., Perrault, C.R., Allen, J.F.: Beyond question answering. In: Strategies for Natural Language Processing, chap. 9, pp. 245–274. Psychology Press, New York (1982)Google Scholar
- 15.Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Cambridge University Press, New York (1990) Google Scholar
- 20.Jackson, G.T., Graesser, A.C.: Content matters: an investigation of feedback categories within an ITS. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 127–134. Los Angeles, California, USA (2007)Google Scholar
- 27.San Pedro, M.O.Z., Baker, R.S.J., Gowda, S.M., Heffernan, N.T.: Towards an understanding of affect and knowledge from student interaction with an intelligent tutoring system. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS, vol. 7926, pp. 41–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Vail, A.K., Boyer, K.E.: Adapting to personality over time: examining the effectiveness of dialogue policy progressions in task-oriented interaction. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, pp. 41–50. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA (2014)Google Scholar