Advertisement

A Utility Model for Tailoring Sensor Networks to Users

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9146)

Abstract

The proportion of people aged over 65 has significantly increased in recent times, with further increases expected. Multiple sensor-based monitoring solutions have been proposed to tackle the main concerns of elderly people and their carers, viz fall detection and safe movement in the house. At the same time, user studies have shown that cost is the most important factor when deciding whether to install a monitoring system. In this paper, we offer a utility-based approach for selecting a sensor configuration for a user on the basis of his/her behaviour patterns and preferences regarding false alerts and delay in the detection of mishaps, while taking into account his/her budget. Our evaluation on two real-life datasets shows that our utility function supports the selection of cost-effective sensor configurations.

Keywords

Older adults Sensor selection Monitoring systems Inactivity detection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cook, D.: Learning setting-generalized activity models for smart spaces. IEEE Intelligent Systems 27(1), 32–38 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weisenberg, J., Cuddihy, P., Rajiv, V.: Augmenting motion sensing to improve detection of periods of unusual inactivity. In: HealthNet 2008 - Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Workshop on Systems and Networking Support for Healthcare and Assisted Living Environments, Breckenridge, Colorado, pp. 2:1–2:6 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moshtaghi, M., Zukerman, I., Albrecht, D., Russell, R.A.: Monitoring personal safety by unobtrusively detecting unusual periods of inactivity. In: Carberry, S., Weibelzahl, S., Micarelli, A., Semeraro, G. (eds.) UMAP 2013. LNCS, vol. 7899, pp. 139–151. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Larizza, M., Zukerman, I., Bohnert, F., Russell, R.A., Busija, L., Albrecht, D.W., Rees, G.: Studies to determine user requirements regarding in-home monitoring systems. In: Masthoff, J., Mobasher, B., Desmarais, M.C., Nkambou, R. (eds.) UMAP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7379, pp. 139–150. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tunca, C., Alemdar, H., Ertan, H., Incel, O., Ersoy, C.: Multimodal wireless sensor network-based ambient assisted living in real homes with multiple residents. Sensors 14(6), 9692–9719 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moshtaghi, M., Zukerman, I.: Modeling the tail of a hyperexponential distribution to detect abnormal periods of inactivity in older adults. In: Pham, D.-N., Park, S.-B. (eds.) PRICAI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8862, pp. 985–997. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Debouk, R., Stéphane Lafortune, D.T.: On an optimization problem in sensor selection. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems 12(4), 417–445 (2002)zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mo, Y., Ambrosino, R., Sinopoli, B.: Sensor selection strategies for state estimation in energy constrained wireless sensor networks. Automatica 47(7), 1330–1338 (2011)zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schneider, M.: Plan recognition in instrumented environments. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Environments, Barcelona, Spain, vol. 2, pp. 295–302 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carbonell, J., Goldstein, J.: The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In: SIGIR 1998 - Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 335–336 (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Information TechnologyMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations