Advertisement

International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization

UMAP 2015: User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization pp 131-142 | Cite as

Gifting as a Novel Mechanism for Personalized Museum and Gallery Interpretation

  • Lesley FoshEmail author
  • Steve Benford
  • Boriana Koleva
  • Katharina Lorenz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9146)

Abstract

The designers of mobile guides for museums and galleries are increasingly concerned with delivering rich interpretation that can be personalized to meet the diverse needs of individual visitors. However, increased personalization can mean that the sociality of museum visits is overlooked. We present a new approach to resolving the tension between the personal and the social that invites visitors themselves to personalize and gift interpretations to others in their social groups. We tested the approach in two different museum settings and with different types of small group, to investigate how visitors personalized experiences for one another, how the personalized experiences were received by visitors, and how they worked as part of a social visit. We reveal how visitors designed highly personal interpretations for one another by drawing inspiration from both the exhibits themselves and their interpersonal knowledge of one another. Our findings suggest that the deep level of personalization generated by our approach can create rich, engaging and socially coherent visits that allow visitors to achieve a balance of goals. We conclude by discussing the broader implications of our findings for personalization.

Keywords

Museums Galleries Personalization Interpretation Collaboration 

References

  1. 1.
    Aoki, P., et al.: Sotto voce: exploring the interplay of conversation and mobile audio spaces. In: CHI 2002, pp. 431–438. ACM (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    AppFurnace (2015). http://appfurnace.com. (accessed 24 January 2015)
  3. 3.
    Ardissono, L., et al.: INTRIGUE: Personalized recommendation of tourist attractions for desktop and handset devices. Applied Artificial Intelligence 17(8–9), 687–714 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bohnert, F., et al.: Using interest and transition models to predict visitor locations in museums. AI Commun. 21(2–3), 195–202 (2008)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carmagnola, F., et al.: Tag-based user modeling for social multi-device adaptive guides. User Model. User Adapt. Interact. 18(5), 497–538 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheverst, K., Mitchell, K., Smith, P.: Providing tailored (context-aware) information to city visitors. In: Brusilovsky, P., Stock, O., Strapparava, C. (eds.) AH 2000. LNCS, vol. 1892, pp. 73–85. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cosley, D., et al.: ArtLinks: fostering social awareness and reflection in museums. In: CHI 2008, pp. 403–412. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crabtree, A., et al.: Intro to “The Turn to The Wild”. ACM TOCHI 20(3), 4 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Gemmis, et al.: Integrating tags in a semantic content-based recommender. In: Pu, P., Bridge, D., Mobasher, B., Ricci, F. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 163–170. Lausanne, Switzerland (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Falk, J.H.: Identity and the museum visitor experience. Left Coast Press Inc., Walnut Creek (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Filippini Fantoni, S.: Personalization through IT in Museums. Does it really work? The case of the marble Museum website. In: Proceedings of ICHIM 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fosh, L., et al.: See me, feel me, touch me, hear me: trajectories and interpretation in a sculpture garden. In: CHI 2013, pp. 149–158. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuflik, T., et al.: A visitor’s guide in an “Active museum”: presentations, communications, and reflection. ACM J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 3(3) (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Laaksolahti, J., et al.: The LEGA: a device for leaving and finding tactile traces. In: TEEI 2011, pp. 193–196. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mauss, M.: The gift: the form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. Routledge Classics, London (1990)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oppermann, R., Specht, M.: A context-sensitive nomadic exhibition guide. In: Thomas, P., Gellersen, H.-.-W. (eds.) HUC 2000. LNCS, vol. 1927, pp. 127–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rocchi, C., et al.: Fostering conversation after the museum visit: a WOZ study for a shared interface. In: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI 2008), pp. 335–338 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Robles, J.S.: Troubles with assessments in gifting occasions. Discourse Studies 14(6), 753–777 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sherry Jr., J.F.: Gift giving in anthropological perspective. Journal of Consumer Research 10(2), 157–168 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stock, O., et al.: Adaptive, intelligent presentation of information for the museum visitor in PEACH. User Model. User Adapt. Interact. 17(3), 257–304 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tolmie, P., et al.: Supporting group interactions in museum visiting. In: CSCW 2013, pp. 1049–1059. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang, Y., et al.: Semantic relations in content-based recommender systems. In: Gil Y., Fridman Noy, N. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Knowledge Capture, pp. 209–210 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lesley Fosh
    • 2
    • 1
    Email author
  • Steve Benford
    • 1
    • 2
  • Boriana Koleva
    • 1
    • 2
  • Katharina Lorenz
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Computer ScienceUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.School of HumanitiesUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations