Abstract
In recent years a number of Consumer-Based Brand Equity (CBBE) models and measurement scales have been introduced in the branding literature. However, examinations of brand equity in Private Labels (PL) are rather limited. This study aims to compare the validity of the two prominent CBBE models those introduced by Yoo and Donthu (2001) and Nam, Ekinci, and Whyatt (2011). In order to test the models and make this comparison, the study collected data from 236 respondents who rated private labels in Spain. A list of 30 different fashion and sportswear PL was introduced to respondents. These brands do not make any reference to the retail store in which they are sold. Research findings suggest that the extended CBBE model introduced by Nam et al. (2011) and Ciftci, Ekinci, and Whyatt (2014) is more reliable and valid than Yoo and Donthu’s model for assessing PL. Theoretical contributions and managerial implications are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York: Free Press.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
Boo, S., Busser, J., & Baloglu, S. (2009). A model of customer-based brand equity and its application to multiple destinations. Tourism Management, 30(2), 219–231.
Buil, I., Martinez, E., & Chernatony, L. D. (2013). The influence of brand equity on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 30(1), 62–74.
Burt, S., & Davies, K. (2010). From the retail brand to the retailer as a brand: Themes and issues in retail branding research. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 38(11), 865–878.
Calvo-Porral, C., & Lévy-Mangin, J. P. (2014). Private label brands: major perspective of two customer-based brand equity models. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 24(4), 431–452.
Ciftci, S., Ekinci, Y., & Whyatt, G. (2014). A cross validation of consumer-based brand equity (CBBE) scales in fashion retail industry. 2014 AMS Global Marketing Conference, Singapore, July 15–18.
Cobb-Walgren, C. J., Beal, C., & Donthu, N. (1995). Brand equity, brand preferences, and purchase intent. Journal of Advertising, 24(3), 25–40.
Cuneo, A., Lopez, P., & Yagüe, M. J. (2012). Measuring private labels brand equity: A consumer perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 46(7/8), 952–964.
Ekinci, Y., Dawes, P. L., & Massey, G. R. (2008). An extended model of the antecedents and consequences of consumer satisfaction for hospitality services. European Journal of Marketing, 42(1), 35–68.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(February), 39–50.
Frank, R. E., & Boyd, H. W. (1965). Are private-brand-prone grocery customers really different. Journal of Advertising Research, 5(4), 27–35.
Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing, 8(4), 36–44.
Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspectives (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Herstein, R., & Gamliel, E. (2004). An investigation of private branding as a global phenomenon. Journal of Euromarketing, 13(4), 59–77.
Jung, J., & Sung, E. Y. (2008). Consumer-based brand equity; comparisons among Americans and South Koreans in the USA and South Koreans in Korea. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 12(1), 24–35.
Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(January), 1–22.
Kim, H., Kim, W. G., & An, J. A. (2003). The effect of consumer-based brand equity on firms’ financial performance. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 20(4), 335–351.
Kim, K. H., Ko, E., Xu, B., & Han, Y. (2012). Increasing customer equity of luxury fashion brands through nurturing consumer attitude. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1495–1499.
Lee, J. S., & Back, K. J. (2010). Re-examination of attendee-based brand equity. Tourism Management, 31, 395–401.
Maio Mackay, M. (2001). Evaluation of brand equity measures: Further empirical results. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 10(1), 38–51.
Malhotra, N. K. (2010). Marketing research: An applied orientation (6th ed.). London: Pearson Education.
Molinillo, S., Ekinci, Y., Whyatt, G., & Occhiocupo, N. (2014). A trend analysis of private label research between 2000 and 2012. In J. C. Gázquez-Abad, F. J. Martínez-López, I. Esteban-Millat, & J. A. Mondejar-Jiménez (Eds.), National brand and private labels in retailing (Springer proceedings in business and economics, pp. 171–178). Cham: Springer.
Nam, J., Ekinci, Y., & Whyatt, G. (2011). Brand equity, brand loyalty and consumer satisfaction. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 1009–1030.
Nielsen. (2011). Global private label report: The rise of the value-conscious shopper. Available at www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2011/global-private-label-report-the-rise-of-the-value-conscious-shopper.html. Accessed March 3, 2014.
Pike, S., Bianchi, C., Kerr, G., & Patti, C. (2010). Consumer-based brand equity for Australia as a long-haul tourism destination in an emerging market. International Marketing Review, 27(4), 434–449.
Pitta, D. A., & Katsanis, L. P. (1995). Understanding brand equity for successful brand extension. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 12(4), 51–64.
Private Label Manufacturers Association. (2014). Industry news. Available at www.plmainternational.com/industry-news/private-label-today. Accessed March 8, 2015.
Rubio, N., Villaseñor, N., & Yagüe, M. J. (2015). Measuring store brand equity from the formative perspective; differences between heavy and light store brand buyers. Journal of Marketing Trends, 2(1), 29–36.
Tolba, A. H., & Hassan, S. S. (2009). Linking customer-based brand equity with brand market performance: A managerial approach. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 18(5), 356–366.
Washburn, J. H., Brian, D. T., & Priluck, R. (2000). Co-branding: Brand equity and trial effects. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(7), 591–604.
Washburn, J., & Plank, R. (2002). Measuring brand equity: An evaluation of a consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(6), 46–61.
Xu, J. B., & Chan, A. (2010). A conceptual framework of hotel experience and customer-based brand equity: Some research questions and implications. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 22(2), 174–193.
Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Business Research, 52(1), 1–14.
Zeithaml, V. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of the evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.
Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). Problems and strategies in services marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(Spring), 33–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: Scales and factor loadings (Yoo & Donthu, 2001)
Scales | Measurement | Factor loadings | |
---|---|---|---|
Perceived quality | PQ1 | The likely quality of this brand is extremely high | 0.68 |
PQ2 | The likelihood that this brand would be functional is very high | 0.92 | |
Brand awareness | BA1 | I can recognize this brand among other fashion or sportswear brands | 0.74 |
BA2 | I am aware of this brand | 0.84 | |
BA3 | Some characteristics of this brand come to my mind quickly | 0.58 | |
Brand loyalty | BL1 | I consider myself to be loyal to this brand | 0.75 |
BL2 | This brand would be my first choice | 0.84 | |
BL3 | I will not buy from other fashion or sportswear brands if this brand is available in the store | 0.86 | |
Overall brand equity | BE1 | It makes sense to buy this brand instead of any other, even if they are the same | 0.80 |
BE2 | Even if another fashion or sportswear brand has the same features as this brand, I would prefer to buy this brand | 0.93 | |
BE3 | If another fashion or sportswear brand is not different from this brand in any way, it seems smarter to purchase this brand | 0.86 |
Appendix 2: Scales and factor loadings (Nam et al., 2011; Ciftci et al., 2014)
Scales | Measurement | Factor loadings | |
---|---|---|---|
Brand awareness | BA1 | I can recognize this brand among other fashion or sportswear brands | 0.76 |
BA2 | I am aware of this brand | 0.78 | |
BA3 | Some characteristics of this brand come to my mind quickly | 0.63 | |
Physical quality | PHQ1 | This brand offers products of very good quality features | 0.79 |
PHQ2 | This brand offers products of consistent quality | 0.72 | |
PHQ3 | This brand offers very durable products | 0.76 | |
PHQ4 | This brand offers very reliable products | 0.82 | |
Staff behaviour | SB1 | Employees who are selling this brand are competent in doing their jobs | 0.83 |
SB2 | Employees who are selling this brand are helpful | 0.95 | |
SB3 | Employees who are selling this brand are friendly | 0.90 | |
Brand identification | BI2 | If a story in the media criticizes this brand, I would feel embarrassed | 0.95 |
BI3 | When someone criticizes this brand’s products, it feels like a personal insult | 0.88 | |
Lifestyle congruence | LC1 | This brand’s products reflect my personal lifestyle | 0.85 |
LC2 | This brand’s products are totally in line with my lifestyle | 0.92 | |
LC3 | This brand’s products support my lifestyle | 0.93 | |
Ideal self-congruence | IC1 | The typical customer of this brand has an image similar to how I like to see myself | 0.82 |
IC2 | This brand has an image similar to how I like to see myself | 0.94 | |
IC3 | This brand has an image which represents how I would like others to see me | 0.81 | |
Consumer satisfaction | CS2 | Worse than I expected – Better than I expected | 0.68 |
CS3 | Worse than similar brands I purchase – Better than other brands I purchase | 0.71 | |
CS4 | Terrible – Delighted | 0.81 | |
Brand loyalty | BLN1 | I will recommend this brand to someone who seeks my advice | 0.92 |
BLN2 | Next time I will purchase a product from this brand again | 0.79 |
Appendix 3: Results of the hypotheses testing (Yoo & Donthu, 2001)
Relationships | SPC | t-value | |
---|---|---|---|
H1 | Perceived quality → Overall brand equity | 0.20 | 3.00** |
H2 | Brand awareness → Overall brand equity | 0.08 | 1.14 |
H3 | Brand loyalty → Overall brand equity | 0.69 | 9.66*** |
Variance explained (R2) | |||
Overall brand equity | 0.71 |
** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
Appendix 4: Results of the hypotheses testing (Nam et al., 2011; Ciftci et al., 2014)
Relationships | SPC | t-value | |
---|---|---|---|
H1 | Physical quality → Consumer satisfaction | 0.50 | 5.05*** |
H2 | Staff behaviour → Consumer satisfaction | 0.05 | 0.69 |
H3 | Brand identification → Consumer satisfaction | 0.14 | 1.91* |
H4 | Lifestyle congruence → Consumer satisfaction | −0.06 | −0.60 |
H5 | Ideal self-congruence → Consumer satisfaction | 0.04 | 0.36 |
H6 | Brand awareness → Consumer satisfaction | 0.05 | 0.55 |
H6 | Consumer satisfaction → Brand loyalty | 0.23 | 2.90** |
H7a | Physical quality → Brand loyalty | 0.32 | 3.61*** |
H7b | Staff behaviour → Brand loyalty | −0.03 | −0.53 |
H7c | Brand Identification → Brand loyalty | −0.07 | −1.21 |
H7d | Lifestyle congruence → Brand loyalty | 0.09 | 1.10 |
H7e | Ideal self-congruence → Brand loyalty | 0.05 | 0.69 |
H7f | Brand awareness → Brand loyalty | 0.41 | 4.83*** |
Variance explained (R2) | |||
Consumer satisfaction | 0.33 | ||
Brand loyalty | 0.62 |
Note SPC Standardized path coefficient; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Molinillo, S., Ekinci, Y., Japutra, A. (2015). A Cross Validation of Consumer-Based Brand Equity (CBBE) with Private Labels in Spain. In: Martínez-López, F., Gázquez-Abad, J., Sethuraman, R. (eds) Advances in National Brand and Private Label Marketing. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20182-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20182-5_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20181-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20182-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)