‘Creative Little Scientists’ Project: Mapping and Comparative Assessment of Early Years Science Education Policy and Practice

  • Fani Stylianidou
  • Esme Glauert
  • Dimitris Rossis
  • Sari Havu-Nuutinen
Part of the Contributions from Science Education Research book series (CFSE, volume 2)


Creative Little Scientists was a 30-month (2011–2014) EU/FP7-funded research project focusing on the synergies between early years science and mathematics education and the development of children’s creativity, in response to increasing interest in these areas in European educational policy. Using a variety of methods, including desk research, a teacher survey and classroom-based fieldwork, the research provided insights into whether and how children’s creativity is fostered and appropriate learning outcomes, including children’s interest, emerge. Based on these, the project proposed changes in policy and teacher education encompassing curriculum, pedagogy and assessment.

This paper focuses on the results from the first research phase, where existing policies and reported practices in early years science and mathematics education in the sample countries were mapped and compared, by means of a) desk research examining national policies, curricula and assessments and b) a survey aiming to gain insights into teachers’ conceptualisations of their own practice. Findings across the varied contexts in partner countries indicate potential for inquiry and creativity but also suggest a number of areas for policy development and attention in early years teacher education.


Early years Science education Creativity Comparative study Policy 



The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no 289081.

We would also like to mention and thank the following researchers and their teams, who contributed directly to the reported part of the research and were not co-authors of this paper: Prof. Teresa Cremin, Prof. Anna Craft, Dr. Jim Clack, Dr. Andrew Manches, Dr. Ashley Compton, Alison Riley, Dr. Hilde Van Houte, Prof. Annette Scheersoi, Prof. Manuel Filipe Costa, Prof. Paulo Varela, Dr. Dan Sporea, Dr. Adelina Sporea, Dr. Olga Megalakaki and Prof. Suzanne Gatt.


  1. Bancroft, S., Fawcett, M., & Hay, P. (2008). Researching children researching the world. London: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bonawitz, E., Shafto, P., Gweon, H., Goodman, N. D., Spelke, E., & Schulz, L. (2011). The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition, 120(3), 322–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chappell, K., Craft, A., Burnard, P., & Cremin, T. (2008). Question-posing and question-responding: The heart of ‘possibility thinking’ in the Early Years. Early Years, 28(3), 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cindy, E., Duncan, R. G., & Clark, A. C. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller and Clark 2006. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Craft, A. (2001). Little c creativity. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in education (pp. 45–61). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  6. Craft, A., Cremin, T., Burnard, P., Dragovic, T., & Chappell, K. (2012a). Possibility thinking: Culminative studies of an evidence-based concept driving creativity? Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 40, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/03004279.2012.656671.Google Scholar
  7. Craft, A., McConnon, L., & Matthews, A. (2012b). Creativity and child-initiated play: Fostering possibility thinking in four-year-olds. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(1), 48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Creative Little Scientists. (2012). Conceptual framework. D2.2. Lead Authors: A. Craft, T. Cremin, J. Clack, A. Compton, J. Johnston, & A. Riley. Accessed 29 Dec 2014.
  9. Creative Little Scientists. (2014a). Final report on creativity and science and mathematics education for young children. D6.5. Lead Authors: F. Stylianidou & D. Rossis. Accessed 29 Dec2014.
  10. Creative Little Scientists. (2014b). Set of recommendations to policy makers and stakeholders. D6.6. Lead Authors: D. Rossis & F. Stylianidou. Accessed 29 Dec 2014.
  11. Cremin, T., Burnard, P., & Craft, A. (2006). Pedagogy and possibility thinking in the Early Years. Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(2), 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. European Commission. (2011). Science education in Europe: National policies practices and research. Brussels: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency EACEAE9 Eurydice.Google Scholar
  13. Feldhusen, J. F., & Ban, G. E. (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8(3), 231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gago, J. M., Ziman, J., Caro, P., Constantinou, C., Davies, G., Parchmann, I., et al. (2004). Increasing human resources for science and technology in Europe (Report). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  15. Goswami, U. (2015). Children’s cognitive development and learning. New York: Cambridge Primary Review Trust.Google Scholar
  16. Harlen, W. (2008). Science as a key component of the primary curriculum: a rationale with policy implications. Wellcome: Perspectives on Education: Primary Science 1.Google Scholar
  17. Harrison, C., & Howard, S. (2011). Issues in primary assessment: Assessment for learning; how and why it works in primary classrooms. Primary Science, 116, 5–7.Google Scholar
  18. John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Koballa, T. J., & Glynn, S. M. (2008). Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 75–102). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96(4), 674–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  22. Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction: What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Poddiakov, N. (2011). Searching, experimenting and the heuristic structure of a preschool child’s experience. International Journal of Early Years Education, 19(1), 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Koedinger, K. R. (2005). Designing knowledge scaffolds to support mathematical problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 23(3), 313–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sylva, K. (2009). Early childhood matters: Evidence from the effective pre-school and primary education project. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  26. van den Akker, J. (2007). Curriculum design research. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research. Enschede: Axis Media-ontwerpers.Google Scholar
  27. Wang, F., Kinzie, M. B., McGuire, P., & Pan, E. (2010). Applying technology to inquiry-based learning in early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(5), 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fani Stylianidou
    • 1
  • Esme Glauert
    • 2
  • Dimitris Rossis
    • 1
  • Sari Havu-Nuutinen
    • 3
  1. 1.Ellinogermaniki AgogiPalliniGreece
  2. 2.UCL Institute of EducationLondonUK
  3. 3.School of Applied Education Science and Teacher EducationUniversity of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland

Personalised recommendations