Advertisement

Tunnelling Methods and Unruh-DeWitt Detectors in Curved Spacetimes

  • Giovanni AcquavivaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 170)

Abstract

In this contribution we describe some interesting interplay between quantum theory, general relativity and thermodynamics. In order to highlight the connection between these theories, we describe two approaches that allow to calculate thermal features as perceived by different observers in curved spacetimes. the tunnelling method and the Unruh-DeWitt detector. In this context, the semi-classical tunnelling approach is applied to the issue of Hawking radiation and allows the calculation of the horizon temperature in a wide variety of scenarios. The Unruh-DeWitt model is instead a quantum field-theoretical approach that should give a more exact answer in terms of transition rates between energy levels of an idealized detector.

Keywords

Black Hole Tunnelling Method Wightman Function Tunnelling Particle Trapping Horizon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

GA would like to thank Luciano Vanzo, Sergio Zerbini and Roberto Di Criscienzo for valuable discussions and groupwork that lead to the results presented in this contribution.

References

  1. 1.
    G. Acquaviva, R. Di Criscienzo, M. Tolotti, L. Vanzo, S. Zerbini, Unruh-DeWitt detectors in spherically symmetric dynamical space-times. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 51, 1555–1571 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B.S. DeWitt, Gravitational radiation, in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, eds. by S.W. Hawking, W. Israel (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979), pp. 680–745Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S.W. Hawking, Black hole explosions? Nature 248, 30–31 (1974)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S.A. Hayward, Unified first law of black-hole dynamics and relativistic thermodynamics. Class. Quant. Grav. 15, 3147–3162 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Kodama, Conserved energy flux for the spherically symmetric system and the backreaction problem in the black hole evaporation. Prog. Theor. Phys. 63, 1217–1228 (1980)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Kraus, F. Wilczek, Self-interaction correction to black hole radiance. Nucl. Phys. B 13, 403–420 (1995)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.K. Parikh, F. Wilczek, Hawking radiation as tunneling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5042–5045 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Srinivasan, T. Padmanabhan, Particle production and complex path analysis. Phys. Rev. D 60, 24007 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W.G. Unruh, Notes on black-hole evaporation. Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. Vanzo, G. Acquaviva, R. Di Criscienzo, Tunnelling methods and Hawking’s radiation: achievements and prospects. Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 183001 (2011)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di FisicaUniversità degli Studi di TrentoTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations