Abstract
Unidirectional fiber-reinforced elastomers are investigated. A respective finite strain model is formulated within the couple stress theory, and a specific new form of strain energy density is implemented for the three-dimensional finite element analysis. The homogeneous anisotropic model is based on kinematics and constitutive equations proposed by Spencer and Soldatos (International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 42:355–368, 2007) and includes additional material parameter regulating bending stiffness of the material regardless of its tensile stiffness. The procedure of determination of the additional material parameter is offered for the case of simple beam under small strains. Numerical simulations of four-point bending test are presented to demonstrate advantage of the new model.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Forest, S., & Sievert, R. (2006). Nonlinear microstrain theories. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 43, 7224–7245.
Cosserat, E., & Cosserat, F. (1909). Théorie des corps déformables. Paris: A. Hermann et Fils.
Eringen, A. C. (1962). Nonlinear theory of continuous media. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Altenbach, J., Altenbach, H., & Eremeyev, V. A. (2010). On generalized Cosserat-type theories of plates and shells: A short review and bibliography. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 80, 73–92.
Koiter, W. T. (1964). Couple stresses in the theory of elasticity I and II. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 67, 17–44.
Spencer, A. J. M. (1972). Deformations of fibre-reinforced materials. London: Oxford University Press.
Forest, S., & Sab, K. (1998). Cosserat overall modelling of heterogeneous materials. Mechanics Research Communications, 25(4), 449–454.
de Borst, R. (1993). A generalisation of J 2 —Flow theory for polar continua. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 103, 347–362.
Sansour, C., Skatulla, S., & Zbib, H. (2010). A formulation for the micromorphic continuum at finite inelastic strains. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 47, 1546–1554.
Isbuga, V., & Regueiro, R. A. (2011). Three-dimensional finite element analysis of finite deformation micromorphic linear isotropic elasticity. International Journal of Engineering Science, 49, 1326–1336.
Tsiatas, G. C. (2009). A new Kirchhoff plate model based on a modified couple stress theory. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 46, 2757–2764.
Park, S. K., & Gao, X.-L. (2006). Bernoulli–Euler beam model based on a modified couple stress theory. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 16, 2355–2359.
Lam, D. C. C., Yang, F., Chong, A. C. M., Wang, J., & Tong, P. (2003). Experiments and theory in strain gradient elasticity. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 51, 1477–1508.
Bauer, S., Schäfer, M., Grammenoudis, P., & Tsakmakis, C. (2010). Three-dimensional finite elements for large deformation micropolar elasticity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 199, 2643–2654.
Chen, W., & Si, J. (2013). A model of composite laminated beam based on the global–local theory and new modified couple-stress theory. Composite Structures, 103, 99–107.
Fleck, N. A., & Shu, J. Y. (1995). Microbuckle initiation in fibre composites: A finite element study. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 43(12), 1887–1918.
Spencer, A. J. M., & Soldatos, K. P. (2007). Finite deformations of fibre-reinforced elastic solid with fibre bending stiffness. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 42, 355–368.
Zheng, Q.-S. (1994). Theory of representations for tensor functions. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 47, 554.
Toupin, R. A. (1962). Elastic materials with couple-stresses. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 11, 385.
Soldatos, K. P. (2013). Foundation of polar linear elasticity for fibre-reinforced materials. Journal of Elasticity, 114(2), 155–178.
Holzapfel, G. A. (2000). Nonlinear solid mechanics. A continuum approach for engineering. Chichester: Wiley.
Lasota, T. (2013). Computational modelling of mechanical behaviour of “elastomer-steel fibre” composite. Dissertation, Brno University of Technology, Brno.
Timmel, M., Kolling, S., & Kaliske, M. (2007). Phenomenological and micromechanical modeling of anisotropic effects in hyperelastic materials. LS-DYNA FORUM 6, Frankenthal
Soldatos, K. P. (2010). Second-gradient plane deformations of ideal fibre-reinforced materials: Implications of hyper-elasticity theory. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 68(1), 99–127.
Lasota, T., Burša, J., & Fedorova, S. (2012). Constitutive equations and finite element formulation for anisotropic hyperelastic composites based on constrained Cosserat continuum. Paper presented at the European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Vienna, Austria, September 10–14, 2012.
Huebner, K. H., Dewhirst, D. L., Smith, D. E., & Byrom, T. G. (2001). The finite element method for engineers (4th ed.). New York: Wiley-InterScience.
Su, W., & Liu, S. (2010). Size-dependent optimal microstructure design based on couple-stress theory. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 42, 243–254.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation project number 13-16304S, by faculty project number FSI-S-14-2344, and through NETME CENTRE PLUS (LO1202) by financial means from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports under the “National Sustainability Programme I.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
The material parameter k 2 can be determined under condition that the tensile force in the direction of fiber remains the same in both the homogenous and heterogeneous models under uniaxial tension \( {P}^{\mathrm{het}}={P}^{\hom } \).
Consider \( \mathbf{A}=\left(\begin{array}{c}\hfill \mathbf{1}\hfill \\ {}\hfill \mathbf{0}\hfill \\ {}\hfill \mathbf{0}\hfill \end{array}\right) \) and uniaxial tension in the direction X 1. We consider small tensile strains in the fiber direction; therefore linearized constitutive equations might be used. \( {\sigma}_{ij}=2{F}_{ik}{F}_{jl}\frac{\partial W}{\partial {C}_{ikl}} \) is general constitutive relation for incompressible hyperelastic material (hydrostatic pressure is absent). The strain energy density is given by \( W=\frac{\mu }{2}\left({I}_1-3\right)+{k}_2{\left({I}_4-1\right)}^2 \). The right Cauchy–Green deformation tensor is \( C=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}\hfill {\lambda}_1^2\hfill & \hfill 0\hfill & \hfill 0\hfill \\ {}\hfill 0\hfill & \hfill {\lambda}_2^2\hfill & \hfill 0\hfill \\ {}\hfill 0\hfill & \hfill 0\hfill & \hfill {\lambda}_3^2\hfill \end{array}\right), \) and incompressibility condition holds \( {\lambda}_1{\lambda}_2{\lambda}_3=1 \), where λ 1, λ 2, λ 3 are principal stretch ratios.
Consequently, we can write that
where \( \uplambda ={\uplambda}_1 \) is the stretch ratio in the direction of fiber.
For the small strains, it takes form
The tensile force acting on the section will be
As to the heterogeneous model, the tensile force in linearized case is as follows:
where ψ f is the fiber volume fraction and E m and E f are matrix and fiber moduli.
Consequently, we have condition
and so it follows that
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fedorova, S., Lasota, T., Burša, J. (2016). Computational Modeling of Fiber Composites with Thick Fibers as Homogeneous Structures with Use of Couple Stress Theory. In: Marcal, P., Yamagata, N. (eds) Design and Analysis of Reinforced Fiber Composites. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20007-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20007-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20006-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20007-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)