Advertisement

Tension Suture Technique Combined with Lidocaine-Adrenaline-Saline Infiltration Decreases Complications and Promotes Recovery in Abdominoplasty

  • Asko SalmiEmail author

Abstract

Abdominoplasty may have serious postoperative problems as well as prolonged healing after surgery. Therefore, new techniques are needed to improve results and to decrease complications. Tension suture technique combined with lidocaine-adrenaline-saline infiltration prior to surgery can be used to achieve this goal. Tension sutures have been shown to decrease complications in abdominoplasty and lidocaine-adrenaline infiltration to reduce bleeding in other major operations. These two techniques are combined, and the results show that this technique is safe and reduces operating time, blood loss, and clinical complications as well as makes use of drains unnecessary with minimal risk of postoperative seroma formation. Also wound complications are rare. This chapter is based on our study and experience of more than 350 patients operated on using this technique.

Keywords

Eating Disorder Seroma Formation Reduction Mammoplasty Wound Healing Problem Increase Complication Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Saariniemi K, Salmi A, Peltoniemi H, Helle M, Charpentier P, Kuokkanen H. Abdominoplasty improves quality of life, psychological distress and eating disorder symptoms a prospective study. Plast Surg Int. 2014;2014:197232.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Papadopoulos NA, Staffler V, Mirceva V, Henrich G, Papadopoulos ON, Kovacs L, Herschbach P, Machens HG, Biemer E. Does abdominoplasty have a positive influence on quality of life, self-esteem, and emotional stability? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(6):957e–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Semer NB, Ho WC, Mills S, Rajashekara B, Taylos JR, Trung NB, Young H, Kivuls J. Abdominal lipectomy: a prospective outcomes study. Perm J. 2008;12(2):23–7.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Song AY, Rubin JP, Thomas V, Dudas JR, Marra KG, Fernstrom MH. Body image and quality of life in post massive weight loss body countering patients. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006;14(9):1626–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Matarasso A, Swift RW, Rankin M. Abdominoplasty and abdominal contour surgery: a national plastic surgery survey. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(6):1797–808.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pollock T, Pollock H. Progressive tension sutures in abdominoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 2004;31(4):583–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Momeni A, Heier M, Bannasch H, Stark GB. Complications in abdominoplasty: a risk factor analysis. J Plast Reconst Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(1):1250–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neaman KC, Hansen JE. Analysis of complications from abdominoplasty: a review of 206 cases at a university hospital. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;58(3):292–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stewart KJ, Steward DA, Coghlan B, Harrison DH, Jones BM, Waterhouse N. Complications of 278 consecutive abdominoplasties. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(11):1152–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van Uchelen JH, Werker PM, Kon M. Complications of abdominoplasty in 86 patients. Plast Recontr Surg. 2001;107(7):1869–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gravante G, Araco A, Sorge R, Overton J, Araco F, Gravante G. Pulmonary embolism after bariatric surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60:604–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sarkar S, Smith D, Scott MH. A rare complication of abdominoplasty after bariatric surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64(1):7–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Graf R, de Araujo LR, Rippel R, Neto LG, Pace DT, Cruz GA. Lipoabdominoplasty: liposuction with reduced undermining and traditional abdominal skin flap resection. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006;30(1):1–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khan S, Teotis SS, Mullis WFJacobs WE, Beasley ME, Smith KL, Eaves FF Finical SJ, Watterson PA. Do progressive tension sutures really decrease complications in abdominoplasty? Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56((1):14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khan UD. Risk of seroma with simultaneous liposuction and abdominoplasty and the role of progressive tension sutures. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2008;32(1):92–9.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pollock H, Pollock T. Progressive tension sutures: a technique to reduce local complications in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(7):2583–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mladick RA. Progressive tension sutures to reduce complications in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(2):619.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pollock H, Pollock T. Reducing abdominoplasty complications. Aesthet Surg J. 2002;22(5):475–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shestak KC. Progressive tension sutures: a technique to reduce local complications in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(7):2587–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Andrades P, Prado A, Danilla S, Guerra C, Benitez S, Sepulveda S, Sciarraffia C, De Carolis V. Progressive tension sutures in the prevention of postabdominoplasty seroma: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(4):935–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hellevuo C, Salmi A, Muuronen E. The use of Lidocain-Epinephrine reduces blood loss and operating time with free TRAM breast reconstruction. Eur J Plast Surg. 2002;25(5):243–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Salmi A. Breast reconstruction with free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps in hospitals unaccustomed to microsurgery: original retrospective study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2005;39(3):153–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Habbema L. Breast reduction using liposuction with tumescent local anesthesia and powered cannulas. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35(1):41–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hardwicke JT, Jordan RW, Skillman JM. Infiltration of epinephrine in reduction mammaplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(4):773–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Helle M, Salmi A, Saariniemi K, Kuokkanen H. Tension suture technique combined with lidocain-adrenalin-saline-infiltration decreases complications in abdominoplasty. Scand J Surg. 2012;101(4):297–300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rogliani M, Silvi E, Labardi L, Cervelli V. Obese and nonobese patients: complications of abdominoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57(3):336–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arantes HL, Rosique RG, Rosique MJ, MELAGA JM. The use of quilting suture in abdominoplasty does not need aspiration drainage for prevention of seroma. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010;34(1):102–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sanger C, David LR. Impact of significant weight loss on outcome of body-contouring surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56(1):9–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Manassa EH, Hertl CH, Olbrisch LL. Wound healing problems in smokers and nonsmokers after 132 abdominoplasties. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(6):2082–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plastic SurgeryKL Hospital HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations