Skip to main content

Multiple Orderings of Events in Disease Progression

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9123))

Abstract

The event-based model constructs a discrete picture of disease progression from cross-sectional data sets, with each event corresponding to a new biomarker becoming abnormal. However, it relies on the assumption that all subjects follow a single event sequence. This is a major simplification for sporadic disease data sets, which are highly heterogeneous, include distinct subgroups, and contain significant proportions of outliers. In this work we relax this assumption by considering two extensions to the event-based model: a generalised Mallows model, which allows subjects to deviate from the main event sequence, and a Dirichlet process mixture of generalised Mallows models, which models clusters of subjects that follow different event sequences, each of which has a corresponding variance. We develop a Gibbs sampling technique to infer the parameters of the two models from multi-modal biomarker data sets. We apply our technique to data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative to determine the sequence in which brain regions become abnormal in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease, as well as the heterogeneity of that sequence in the cohort. We find that the generalised Mallows model estimates a larger variation in the event sequence across subjects than the original event-based model. Fitting a Dirichlet process model detects three subgroups of the population with different event sequences. The Gibbs sampler additionally provides an estimate of the uncertainty in each of the model parameters, for example an individual’s latent disease stage and cluster assignment. The distributions and mixtures of sequences that this new family of models introduces offer better characterisation of disease progression of heterogeneous populations, new insight into disease mechanisms, and have the potential for enhanced disease stratification and differential diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jack, C.R., Knopman, D.S., Jagust, W.J., Shaw, L.M., Aisen, P.S., Weiner, M.W., Petersen, R.C., Trojanowski, J.Q.: Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 9(1), 119–128 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., Stadlan, E.M.: Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 34, 939–944 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Villemagne, V.L., Burnham, S., Bourgeat, P., Brown, B., Ellis, K.A., Salvado, O., Szoeke, C., Macaulay, S.L., Martins, R., Maruff, P., Ames, D., Rowe, C.C., Masters, C.L.: Amyloid \(\beta \) deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 12(4), 357–367 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jack, C.R., Knopman, D.S., Jagust, W.J., Petersen, R.C., Weiner, M.W., Aisen, P.S., Shaw, L.M., Vemuri, P., Wiste, H.J., Weigand, S.D., Lesnick, T.G., Pankratz, V.S., Donohue, M.C., Trojanowski, J.Q.: Tracking pathophysiological processes in Alzheimer’s disease: an updated hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers. Lancet neurology 12(2), 207–216 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jack, C.R., Holtzman, D.M.: Biomarker modeling of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 80(6), 1347–1358 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fonteijn, H.M., Modat, M., Clarkson, M.J., Barnes, J., Lehmann, M., Hobbs, N.Z., Scahill, R.I., Tabrizi, S.J., Ourselin, S., Fox, N.C., Alexander, D.C.: An event-based model for disease progression and its application in familial Alzheimer’s disease and Huntington’s disease. NeuroImage 60(3), 1880–1889 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Young, A.L., Oxtoby, N.P., Daga, P., Cash, D.M., Fox, N.C., Ourselin, S., Schott, J.M., Alexander, D.C.: A data-driven model of biomarker changes in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 137, 2564–2577 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fligner, M.A., Verducci, J.S.: Distance based ranking models. JSTOR. Ser. B (Methodol.) 48, 359–369 (1986)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Antoniak, C.E.: Mixtures of Dirichlet processes with applications to Bayesian Nonparametric problems. Ann. Stat. 2, 1152–1174 (1974)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, J., Alexander, D.C.: Probabilistic event cascades for Alzheimer’s disease. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 25, 3104–3112 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meila, M., Chen, H.: Dirichlet process mixtures of generalized mallows models. In: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), pp. 285–294 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meila, M., Bao, L.: Estimation and clustering with infinite rankings. In: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), pp. 393–402 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cardoso, M.J., Wolz, R., Modat, M., Fox, N.C., Rueckert, D., Ourselin, S.: Geodesic information flows. In: Ayache, N., Delingette, H., Golland, P., Mori, K. (eds.) MICCAI 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7511, pp. 262–270. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Klein, A., Worth, A., Tourville, J., Landman, B., Dal, T., Satrajit, C., David, S.G.: An interactive tool for constructing optimal brain colormaps. 16, p.84358 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Meek, C., Meila, M.: Recursive inversion models for permutations. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 27, 631–639 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The EPSRC support this work with grants EP/J020990/01, EP/M020533/1 and EP/M006093/1. This work was supported by the NIHR Queen Square Dementia Biomedical Research Unit and the Leonard Wolfson Experimental Neurology Centre. The Dementia Research Centre is an ARUK coordination centre. DMC receives funding from an anonymous charitable foundation and support from the Brain Research Trust. SO is partially funded by the EU-FP7 project VPH- DARE@IT (FP7-ICT-2011-9-601055) and the NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR BRC UCLH/UCL High Impact Initiative). JMS acknowledges the support of ARUK, the MRC, and the UCL/H Biomedical Research Centre. Data collection and sharing for this project was funded by the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (NIHR Grant U01 AG024904) and DOD ADNI (DOD award number W81XWH-12-2-0012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra L. Young .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Young, A.L. et al. (2015). Multiple Orderings of Events in Disease Progression. In: Ourselin, S., Alexander, D., Westin, CF., Cardoso, M. (eds) Information Processing in Medical Imaging. IPMI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9123. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19992-4_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19992-4_56

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19991-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19992-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics