Advertisement

How to Model Roads in OpenStreetMap? A Method for Evaluating the Fitness-for-Use of the Network for Navigation

  • Xiang ZhangEmail author
  • Tinghua Ai
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Geographic Information Science book series (AGIS)

Abstract

OpenStreetMap (OSM) is mostly a good map for viewers to look at but it lacks of sufficient quality in certain applications like navigation. Quality issues are usually related to how roads are ‘drawn’ (modeled) by OSM contributors. First of all, this paper identifies several issues in tagging and modeling OSM road network by case studies, and also gives suggestions for contributors and routing service providers. As a key contribution, this paper proposes a methodology to evaluate OSM roads that does not rely on reference data or ground truth. The evaluation aims not only to identify errors in OSM data, but also to give more intelligent suggestions based on the information available in the spatial context of the problematic data. More specifically, named roads are recognized based on the concept of “stroke”. Missing or incorrect names can be found by outlier detection within the scope of the named roads. Such an idea can be widely applied to detect inconsistent tags and provide intelligent suggestions for data correction.

Keywords

OpenStreetMap Inconsistency detection Data enrichment Natural road recognition Stroke 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments which substantially improved this paper. This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41301410) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (Grant No. 2013M531742).

References

  1. Brando C, Bucher B (2010) Quality in user generated spatial content: a matter of specifications. In: Proceedings of the 13th AGILE international conference on geographic information science, pp 11–14Google Scholar
  2. Girres JF, Touya G (2010) Quality assessment of the French OpenStreetMap dataset. Trans GIS 14(4):435–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Goodchild MF, Li L (2012) Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spat Stat 1:110–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Heinzle F, Anders K-H, Sester M (2007) Automatic detection of pattern in road networks—methods and evaluation. In: Proceedings of joint workshop visualization and exploration of geospatial data (IAPRS), XXXVI—4/W45Google Scholar
  5. Haklay M (2010) How good is volunteered geographical information? a comparative study of OpenStreetMap and ordnance survey datasets. Environ Plan 4(37):682–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jiang B, Zhao S, Yin J (2008) Self-organized natural roads for predicting traffic flow: a sensitivity study. J Stat Mech 7:P07008Google Scholar
  7. Mondzech J, Sester M (2011) Quality analysis of OpenStreetMap data based on application needs. Cartographica 46(2):115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mooney P, Corcoran P, Winstanley AC (2010) Towards quality metrics for OpenStreetMap. In: Proceedings of the 18th SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 514–517Google Scholar
  9. Neis P, Goetz M, Zipf A (2012a) Towards automatic vandalism detection in OpenStreetMap ISPRS. Int J Geo-Inf 1:315–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Neis P, Zielstra D, Zipf A (2012b) The street network evolution of crowdsourced maps: OpenStreetMap in Germany 2007–2011. Future Internet 4:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Neis P, Zielstra D (2014) Recent developments and future trends in volunteered geographic information research: the case of OpenStreetMap. Future Internet 6:76–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schmitz S, Neis P, Zipf A (2008) New applications based on collaborative geodata—the case of routing. In Proceedings of XXVIII INCA international congress on collaborative mapping and space technology, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India, pp 4–6Google Scholar
  13. Thomson R, Richardson D (1999) The ’good continuation’ principle of perceptual organization applied to the generalization of road networks. In: Proceedings of the ICA, Ottawa, Canada, Session 47BGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhang X, Ai T, Stoter J, Zhao X (2014) Data matching of building polygons at multiple map scales improved by contextual information and relaxation. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens 92:147–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zielstra D, Zipf A (2010) A comparative study of proprietary geodata and volunteered geographic information for Germany. In: Proceedings of the 13th AGILE international conference on geographic information scienceGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Resource and Environmental SciencesWuhan UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations