Abstract
The major electrocardiographic expressions of sinus node dysfunction (SND) are the presence of an abnormal sinus bradycardia and the occurrence of a “sinus pause.” A “sinus pause” is the occurrence on ECG of a sudden pause in the underlying sinus rhythm that can be due to the failure of the sinoatrial (SA) node to initiate (sinus arrest) or to conduct the impulse (sinus exit block). Sinoatrial exit block can be divided into three types: first, second, and third degrees. The second-degree exit block is further classified into type I (SA block with Wenckebach conduction) and type II (SA Mobitz II). SA block is included in a broader clinical scenario called “sick sinus syndrome” (SSS) that may consist in inappropriate sinus bradycardia, SA exit block or sinus arrest, prolonged sinus arrest with failing ectopic pacemaker, persistent atrial or atrioventricular escape rhythm, episodes of alternating supraventricular tachyarrhythmias with bradyarrhythmias, long pause following cardioversion of atrial tachyarrhythmia, or chronotropic incompetence. Symptoms are related to low cardiac output that occurs with brady- and/or tachyarrhythmias. The causes of SSS i nclude intrinsic and extrinsic factors. The cornerstone for the diagnosis of SSS is the correlation of end-organ perfusion symptoms with the occurrence of bradyarrhythmias. When an SSS is suspected, prolonged cardiac monitoring should be considered. Exercise testing, intracardiac electrophysiologic tests, and external or internal long-term devices are helpful in SSS diagnosis. There are no medications that reliably increase the heart rate in patients with bradyarrhythmias. Cardiac pacing therapy through an artificial pacemaker is the only choice, and an early identification of a potential reversible cause is always the first step of treatment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Surawicz B, Knilans TK (2008) Chou’s electrocardiography in clinical practice, 6th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia
Schamroth L, Dove E (1966) The Wenckebach phenomenon in sino-atrial block. Br Heart J 28:350–358
Cabeen WR Jr, Roberts NK, Cbild JS (1978) Recognition of the Wenckebach phenomenon (clinical notes in diagnostic cardiology). West J Med 129:521–526
Oreto G (1997) I disordini del ritmo cardiaco. 2nd edition. Torino: Centro Scientifico Editore
Rubenstein JJ et al (1972) Clinical spectrum of the sick sinus syndrome. Circulation 46(1):5–13
Short DS (1954) The syndrome of alternating bradycardia and tachycardia. Br Heart J 16:208
Gomes JA, Kang PS, Matheson M et al (1981) Coexistence of sick sinus rhythm and atrial flutter-fibrillation. Circulation 63:80–86
Ferrer MI (1968) The sick sinus syndrome in atrial disease. JAMA 206:645–646
Elvan A, Wylie K, Zipes DP (1996) Pacing-induced chronic atrial fibrillation impairs sinus node function in dogs. electrophysiological remodeling. Circulation 94(11):2953–2960
Sparks PB, Jayaprakash S, Vohra JK, Kalman JM (2000) Electrical remodeling of the atria associated with paroxysmal and chronic atrial flutter. Circulation 102(15):1807–1813
Mangrum JM, DiMarco JP (2000) The evaluation and management of bradycardia. N Engl J Med 342:703–709
Corrado D, Pelliccia A, Heidbuchel H et al (2010) Section of Sports Cardiology, European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Recommendations for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiogram in the athlete. Eur Heart J 31:243–259
Northcote RJ, Canning GP, Ballantyne D (1989) Electrocardiographic findings in male veteran endurance athletes. Br Heart J 61:155–160
Wieling W, Thijs RD, van Dijk N et al (2009) Symptoms and signs of syncope: a review of the link between physiology and clinical clues. Brain 132
Menozzi C, Brignole M, Lolli G et al (1993) Follow-up of asystolic episodes in patients with cardioinhibitory, neurally mediated syncope and VVI pacemaker. Am J Cardiol 72:1152–1155
Adán V, Crown LA (2003) Diagnosis and treatment of sick sinus syndrome. Am Fam Physician 67:1725–1732
Jensen PN, Gronroos NN, Chen LY et al (2014) Incidence of and risk factors for sick sinus syndrome in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol 64(6):531–538
Rodriguez RD, Schocken DD (1990) Update on sick sinus syndrome, a cardiac disorder of aging. Geriatrics 45:26–30
Coma Samartin R, Sancho-Tello de Carranza MJ, Ruiz Mateas F et al (2011) Spanish pacemaker registry. Eighth official report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Pacing (2010). Rev Esp Cardiol 64:1154–1167
Cunningham D, Charles R, Cunningham M, de Lange A (2010) Cardiac rhythm management: UK National Clinical Audit. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/nicor/audits/cardiacrhythmmanagement/publicreports/pdfs/Heartrhythm10
Markewitz A (2010) The German Pacemaker Register. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol 21:248–255
Proclemer A, Ghidina M, Gregori D et al (2010) Trend of the main clinical characteristics and pacing modality in patients treated by pacemaker: data from the Italian Pacemaker Registry for the quinquennium 2003–07. Europace 12:202–209
Swedish ICD and Pacemaker Register (2010) Annual statistical report 2010. www.pacemakerregistret.se
Tuppin P, Neumann A, Marijon E et al (2011) Implantation and patient profiles for pacemakers and cardioverter defibrillators in France (2008–2009). Arch Cardiovasc Dis 104
Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G et al (2013) Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Eur Heart J 34:2281–2329
Alboni P, Menozzi C, Brignole M et al (1997) Effects of permanent pacemaker and oral theophylline in sick sinus syndrome the THEOPACE study: a randomized controlled trial. Circulation 96(1):260–266
Shaw DB, Holman RR, Gowers JI (1980) Survival in sinoatrial disorder (sick-sinus syndrome). Br Med J 280:139–141
Sutton R, Kenny RA (1986) The natural history of sick sinus syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 9:1110–1114
Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, Hojberg S et al (2011) A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome. Eur Heart J 32:686–696
Andersen HR, Thuesen L, Bagger JP et al (1994) Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet 344:1523–1528
Castelnuovo E, Stein K, Pitt M et al (2005) The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dual-chamber pacemakers compared with single-chamber pacemakers for bradycardia due to atrioventricular block or sick sinus syndrome: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9:iii, xi–xiii, 1–246
Nielsen JC, Kristensen L, Andersen HR et al (2003) A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:614–623
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Romandini, A., Scappini, L. (2015). Sinoatrial Exit Block. In: Capucci, A. (eds) Clinical Cases in Cardiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19926-9_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19926-9_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19925-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19926-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)